Effect of Theta Burst Stimulation on Alcohol Cue Reactivity
NCT ID: NCT04223154
Last Updated: 2023-05-19
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
11 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-08-26
2021-04-16
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This will be achieved through a double-blind, sham-controlled cohort study in heavy alcohol drinkers with a history of alcohol-related injury. The brain reactivity to alcohol cues (Incentive Salience) and cognitive performance in the presence of an alcoholic beverage cue (Cognitive Control) will be measured immediately before and after participants receive real or sham intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS- a potentiating form of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)) to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC iTBS). The goals of this pilot study are to quantify the acute effect of a single session of real or sham dlPFC iTBS on brain response to alcohol cues (Aim 1) and cognitive flexibility in the presence of an alcohol cue (Aim 2) among risky drinkers (target engagement ).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Residual Effects of Intoxication on Student Performance
NCT00183170
Effect of Cognitive Training on Alcohol Use Outcomes
NCT02113618
Does the Threat of an Aversive Reaction Affect Craving of Alcohol During Cue Exposure in Alcohol Dependent Patients?
NCT00372749
Efficacy and Mechanisms of Technology-based Behavioral Interventions
NCT03510728
Adverse Childhood Experiences in Alcohol Use Disorder
NCT05048758
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The competing neurobehavioral decision systems (CNDS) theory posits that in addiction, choice results from a regulatory imbalance between two decision-making systems (impulsive and executive). These behavioral systems are functionally linked to two functional connectivity networks which regulate the incentive salience of the alcohol cue (Salience Network) and cognitive flexibility required for a vulnerable individual to shift attention away from the alcohol cue (Central Executive Network). Modulating these competing neural circuits (e.g. either dampening the incentive salience associated with alcohol cues (Strategy 1) or amplifying cognitive control in the presence of a cue (Strategy 2) may render alcohol users less vulnerable to relapse. Over the past 7 years, Dr. Hanlon's human brain stimulation research group has been focused on focused on Strategy 1 - dampening alcohol craving and brain reactivity to alcohol cues among heavy alcohol drinkers at risk for AUD or relapse to alcohol use. These studies led to a formal double-blind sham-controlled clinical trial of medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) in treatment-seeking alcohol users. Unfortunately, however, this approach is associated with more pain at the stimulation site (forehead) which undermines its promise as a tool to be readily scaled to a larger population, and it is not clear that this improves the attentional bias towards alcohol cues among these individuals.
Hence, the goal of this proposal is to evaluate Strategy 2 of the CNDS theory- increasing activity in executive control circuitry- as an innovative approach to dampening alcohol cue-reactivity (Aim 1) and improving cognitive control in the presence of an alcohol cue (Aim 2). This will be achieved through a double-blind, sham-controlled cohort study in heavy alcohol drinkers with a history of alcohol-related injury. The brain reactivity to alcohol cues (Incentive Salience) and cognitive performance in the presence of an alcoholic beverage cue (Cognitive Control) will be measured immediately before and after participants receive real or sham intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS- a potentiating form of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)) to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC iTBS). iTBS is a high-potency form of brain stimulation wherein two minutes of iTBS (600 pulses) leads to an increase in cortical excitability that lasts for approximately 30 minutes. In 2018 dlPFC iTBS was FDA-cleared as a treatment for major depressive disorder (wherein 30 sessions over 6 weeks lead to a sustained decrease in depressive symptoms for 6 months). In 2019, the first 2 manuscripts were published demonstrating that iTBS decreases cue-reactivity to cocaine. The goals of this pilot study are to quantify the acute effect of a single session of real or sham dlPFC iTBS on brain response to alcohol cues (Aim 1) and cognitive flexibility in the presence of an alcohol cue (Aim 2) among risky drinkers ("target engagement").
Aim 1: Evaluate the effect of dlPFC iTBS on alcohol cue-reactivity. The blood-oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal associated with exposure to alcohol cues will be measured before and after sham and real iTBS using a validated, patient-tailored alcohol/non-alcoholic beverage cue task. Hypothesis: cue-evoked functional connectivity in the mPFC, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), amygdala, and ventral striatum will be attenuated after real but not sham iTBS.
Aim 2: Evaluate the effect of dlPFC iTBS on cognitive performance in the presence of an alcohol cue. Following the alcohol cue reactivity task all individuals will perform the well-known alcohol Stroop task (downloaded from the NIH toolbox) on a Tablet PC while a glass of the participant's preferred alcoholic beverage (beer, wine, liquor) is placed within 5 feet of the participant (but out of arms length). This will occur before and after TBS. The participant will not be allowed to consume the drink. Hypothesis: Stroop accuracy and reaction time will be impaired at baseline, but this difference will be attenuated by real (but not sham) iTBS to the dlPFC (three way mixed model ANOVA, correcting for multiple comparisons).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
BASIC_SCIENCE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Real TBS to the dlPFC
One session of real intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS) will be delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC)
Real iTBS to the dlPFC
This will be delivered with the Magventure Magpro system; 600 pulses with the active sham coil (double blinded using the USB key).
Sham TBS to the dlPFC
One session of sham Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS) will be delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC)
Sham iTBS to the dlPFC
This will be delivered with the Magventure Magpro system; 600 pulses with the active sham coil (double blinded using the USB key).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Real iTBS to the dlPFC
This will be delivered with the Magventure Magpro system; 600 pulses with the active sham coil (double blinded using the USB key).
Sham iTBS to the dlPFC
This will be delivered with the Magventure Magpro system; 600 pulses with the active sham coil (double blinded using the USB key).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Alcohol use disorder identification test score \>7
3. Drink at least 20 standard sized alcohol beverage servings per week
Exclusion Criteria
2. Currently meets DSM-V criteria for substance use disorder for a substance other than alcohol, marijuana, or nicotine.
3. Has current suicidal or homicidal ideation.
4. Current breath alcohol concentration \>0.002
5. Not currently at risk for withdrawal, as indicated by CIWA-Ar \>5.
6. History of seizures or seizure disorder(s).
7. Females of childbearing potential who are pregnant (by urine HCG), planning to become pregnant, nursing, or who are not using a reliable form of birth control.
8. Any other violation of MRI/TMS safety measures.
9. Unable to read and understand questionnaires, assessments, and the informed consent.
10. No presence of metal objects in the head/neck.
11. History of traumatic brain injury resulting in hospitalization, loss of consciousness for more than 10 minutes, and/or having ever been informed he/she has an epidural, subdural, or subarachnoid hemorrhage.
21 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Colleen Hanlon, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Wake Forest University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Wake Forest Baptist Health Sciences
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB00063018
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.