Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
134 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-01-01
2019-12-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Between 2018 and 2019, data obtained from patients in the SLH and VH groups were reviewed retrospectively. The preoperative and postoperative hematocrit (HCT), hemoglobin (HB), white blood cell (WBC), platelet (PLR), and neutrophil-lymphocyte (NLR) ratios and values were compared as well as the demographic characteristics of the patients.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Inflammatory Markers in Hysterectomies
NCT04184765
Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) as an Inflammatory Markers to Predict Length of Hospital Stay After Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy (TLH) for Benign Indications
NCT05003297
Postoperative CRP Levels and Vaginal Cuff Hematoma
NCT03879499
ONSD as an ICP Marker in vNOTES and TLH
NCT07250178
VNOTES and Vaginal Hysterectomy for Benign Indications
NCT06776718
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
single port laparoscopic hysterectomies
Between 2018 and 2019, data obtained from patients in the SLH and VH groups were reviewed retrospectively. The preoperative and postoperative hematocrit (HCT), hemoglobin (HB), white blood cell (WBC), platelet (PLR), and neutrophil-lymphocyte (NLR) ratios and values were compared as well as the demographic characteristics of the patients.
Single port laparoscopic systems
The first assistant handles the scope from the patient's right side. The second assistant, who is positioned between the legs of the patient, inserts a uterine manipulator (Rumi System; Cooper Surgical, CT). At the beginning of the surgery, a 1.5 to 2.5 cm vertical incision is made within the umbilicus using the open Hasson approach. After the bottom retractor ring of the wound retractor component of the Octo-Port is inverted (DalimSurgNet, Seoul, Korea), it is inserted through the incision deep in the peritoneum. Carbon dioxide is insufflated through the gas valve of the Octo-Port to maintain intra-abdominal pressure at 10 to 12 mm Hg. Through the 10 mm channels of the Octo-Port, a 10 mm, 30° rigid laparoscope is introduced. Rigid laparoscopic instruments are introduced through the 5 mm channels of the Octo-Port. The utero-ovarian ligament or infundibulopelvic ligament, uterine vessels, and uterine ligaments are transected by using the 5 mm LigaSure vessel sealer device
Vaginal hysterectomies
Between 2018 and 2019, data obtained from patients in the SLH and VH groups were reviewed retrospectively. The preoperative and postoperative hematocrit (HCT), hemoglobin (HB), white blood cell (WBC), platelet (PLR), and neutrophil-lymphocyte (NLR) ratios and values were compared as well as the demographic characteristics of the patients.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Single port laparoscopic systems
The first assistant handles the scope from the patient's right side. The second assistant, who is positioned between the legs of the patient, inserts a uterine manipulator (Rumi System; Cooper Surgical, CT). At the beginning of the surgery, a 1.5 to 2.5 cm vertical incision is made within the umbilicus using the open Hasson approach. After the bottom retractor ring of the wound retractor component of the Octo-Port is inverted (DalimSurgNet, Seoul, Korea), it is inserted through the incision deep in the peritoneum. Carbon dioxide is insufflated through the gas valve of the Octo-Port to maintain intra-abdominal pressure at 10 to 12 mm Hg. Through the 10 mm channels of the Octo-Port, a 10 mm, 30° rigid laparoscope is introduced. Rigid laparoscopic instruments are introduced through the 5 mm channels of the Octo-Port. The utero-ovarian ligament or infundibulopelvic ligament, uterine vessels, and uterine ligaments are transected by using the 5 mm LigaSure vessel sealer device
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* the presence of active infection
* using of corticosteroid, acetylsalicylic acid, or anticoagulant
* cystocele or rectocele repair with mesh
45 Years
60 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Derince Training and Research Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
mehmet ozsurmeli
medical doctor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
mehmet ozsurmeli
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Derince Training and Research Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Derince Training and Research Hospital
Kocaeli, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Garry R. Health economics of hysterectomy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Jun;19(3):451-65. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2005.01.010. Epub 2005 Mar 2.
Yoon BS, Seong SJ, Kim IH, Song T, Kim ML, Kim MK. Operative outcomes of single-port-access laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with single-port-access total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;53(4):486-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2013.07.003.
AAGL Advancing Minimally Invasive Gynecology Worldwide. AAGL position statement: route of hysterectomy to treat benign uterine disease. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 Jan-Feb;18(1):1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.10.001. Epub 2010 Nov 6. No abstract available.
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444: choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;114(5):1156-1158. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c33c72.
Nieboer TE, Hendriks JC, Bongers MY, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB. Quality of life after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jan;119(1):85-91. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31823d3b00.
Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R, van Voorst S, Mol BW, Kluivers KB. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8;(3):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub4.
Gynecol Surg. 2013; 10:117-122
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019; 26:1-5.
Cruickshank AM, Fraser WD, Burns HJ, Van Damme J, Shenkin A. Response of serum interleukin-6 in patients undergoing elective surgery of varying severity. Clin Sci (Lond). 1990 Aug;79(2):161-5. doi: 10.1042/cs0790161.
Allendorf JD, Bessler M, Whelan RL, Trokel M, Laird DA, Terry MB, Treat MR. Postoperative immune function varies inversely with the degree of surgical trauma in a murine model. Surg Endosc. 1997 May;11(5):427-30. doi: 10.1007/s004649900383.
Lennard TW, Shenton BK, Borzotta A, Donnelly PK, White M, Gerrie LM, Proud G, Taylor RM. The influence of surgical operations on components of the human immune system. Br J Surg. 1985 Oct;72(10):771-6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800721002.
Iwase M, Kondo G, Watanabe H, Takaoka S, Uchida M, Ohashi M, Nagumo M. Regulation of Fas-mediated apoptosis in neutrophils after surgery-induced acute inflammation. J Surg Res. 2006 Jul;134(1):114-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2005.10.013. Epub 2005 Dec 27.
Ogawa K, Hirai M, Katsube T, Murayama M, Hamaguchi K, Shimakawa T, Naritake Y, Hosokawa T, Kajiwara T. Suppression of cellular immunity by surgical stress. Surgery. 2000 Mar;127(3):329-36. doi: 10.1067/msy.2000.103498.
Collet D, Vitale GC, Reynolds M, Klar E, Cheadle WG. Peritoneal host defenses are less impaired by laparoscopy than by open operation. Surg Endosc. 1995 Oct;9(10):1059-64. doi: 10.1007/BF00188987.
Sietses C, Wiezer MJ, Eijsbouts QA, van Leeuwen PA, Beelen RH, Meijer S, Cuesta MA. The influence of laparoscopic surgery on postoperative polymorphonuclear leukocyte function. Surg Endosc. 2000 Sep;14(9):812-6. doi: 10.1007/s004640010080.
Malik E, Buchweitz O, Muller-Steinhardt M, Kressin P, Meyhofer-Malik A, Diedrich K. Prospective evaluation of the systemic immune response following abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Surg Endosc. 2001 May;15(5):463-6. doi: 10.1007/s004640000348. Epub 2001 Mar 13.
Choi YS, Shin KS, Choi J, Park JN, Oh YS, Rhee TE. Single-port access laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: our initial experiences with 100 cases. Minim Invasive Surg. 2012;2012:543627. doi: 10.1155/2012/543627. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
Liliana M, Alessandro P, Giada C, Luca M. Single-port access laparoscopic hysterectomy: a new dimension of minimally invasive surgery. J Gynecol Endosc Surg. 2011 Jan;2(1):11-7. doi: 10.4103/0974-1216.85273.
Romanelli JR, Earle DB. Single-port laparoscopic surgery: an overview. Surg Endosc. 2009 Jul;23(7):1419-27. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0463-x. Epub 2009 Apr 4. No abstract available.
Gynecol Surg. 2010; 7(2):143-148
Lee YY, Kim TJ, Kim CJ, Kang H, Choi CH, Lee JW, Kim BG, Lee JH, Bae DS. Single-port access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a novel method with a wound retractor and a glove. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):450-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.03.022. Epub 2009 May 31.
Terzi H, Biler A, Turkay U, Kale A. A comparison of novel laparoscopic suturing techniques in single-port surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2019 Dec;28(6):338-343. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2019.1567554. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
Goolab BD. Vaginal hysterectomy and relative merits over abdominal and laparoscopically assisted hysterectomy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Jun;27(3):393-413. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.01.003. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
Dedden SJ, Geomini PMAJ, Huirne JAF, Bongers MY. Vaginal and Laparoscopic hysterectomy as an outpatient procedure: A systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Sep;216:212-223. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.07.015. Epub 2017 Jul 22.
Fornara P, Doehn C, Seyfarth M, Jocham D. Why is urological laparoscopy minimally invasive? Eur Urol. 2000 Mar;37(3):241-50. doi: 10.1159/000052351.
Slade MS, Simmons RL, Yunis E, Greenberg LJ. Immunodepression after major surgery in normal patients. Surgery. 1975 Sep;78(3):363-72.
Sietses C, Wiezer MJ, Eijsbouts QA, Beelen RH, van Leeuwen PA, von Blomberg BM, Meijer S, Cuesta MA. A prospective randomized study of the systemic immune response after laparoscopic and conventional Nissen fundoplication. Surgery. 1999 Jul;126(1):5-9. doi: 10.1067/msy.1999.98702.
Gupta A, Watson DI. Effect of laparoscopy on immune function. Br J Surg. 2001 Oct;88(10):1296-306. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01860.x.
Grace PA, Quereshi A, Coleman J, Keane R, McEntee G, Broe P, Osborne H, Bouchier-Hayes D. Reduced postoperative hospitalization after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1991 Feb;78(2):160-2. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800780209.
Faist E, Kupper TS, Baker CC, Chaudry IH, Dwyer J, Baue AE. Depression of cellular immunity after major injury. Its association with posttraumatic complications and its reversal with immunomodulation. Arch Surg. 1986 Sep;121(9):1000-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1986.01400090026004.
Sandberg EM, la Chapelle CF, van den Tweel MM, Schoones JW, Jansen FW. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 May;295(5):1089-1103. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4323-y. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
Ramirez PT. Single-port laparoscopic surgery: is a single incision the next frontier in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery? Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Aug;114(2):143-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.06.007. No abstract available.
Fader AN, Escobar PF. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report. Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Aug;114(2):157-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.05.020. Epub 2009 May 28.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
23068423
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.