Measuring Practice Pattern Changes and Clinical Utility of a Novel Test for Preeclampsia
NCT ID: NCT04204018
Last Updated: 2020-02-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
108 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-11-22
2019-12-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Collection of Whole Blood Samples for the Evaluation of Preeclampsia (Pre-E) Biomarkers From Pregnant Women
NCT03767803
Maternal Fetal Device Performance Singleton
NCT06726343
Collection of Samples From Pregnant Women for the Evaluation of Preeclampsia (Pre-E) Biomarkers
NCT02780414
Goal-Directed Therapy in Pregnant Women at High Risk of Developing Preeclampsia
NCT01351428
Continuous Non-invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Early-onset Severe Preeclampsia: a Comparison of Echocardiography, Bioreactance, and Finger Cuff Measurements
NCT05299229
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study leverages simulated patient cases called Clinical Performance and Value vignettes (CPVs) in a proven methodology to rapidly measure physician care decisions. CPVs are a unique and scalable tool that standardizes practice measurement by having all providers care for the same (virtual) patients. With all providers caring for the same patients, the CPVs generate unbiased data that yields powerful insights into clinical decision making and how these decisions change with the introduction of a new product or solution. Data from the CPVs can quickly demonstrate the clinical utility of a solution, be published in peer-reviewed literature, inform marketing strategies and positively impact coverage and reimbursement decisions.
The study is a prospective cohort trial with five steps:
1. Enrollment: The study will enroll 110 practicing obstetrician/gynecologists (OB/GYNs) in the U.S. who are determined to be eligible by an eligibility screener.
2. Provider survey: Once providers are enrolled in the study, they will be asked to complete a questionnaire describing their practice and professional background.
3. Randomization: The 110 OB/GYNs will be randomized into equally-sized (55) control and intervention arms.
4. Education: The intervention-arm OB/GYNs will receive educational materials duplicating what physicians would receive in the real-world market as they adopt the Progenity technology. These materials are comprised of a slide deck and/or a fact sheet.
5. CPVs: Physicians will then complete the four CPV patient simulations in random order. Cases will be identical across the intervention and control arms, except that the intervention arm will receive Progenity PE test results at an appropriate point in each simulated case. All cases are presented on an online platform, participants are provided with unique weblinks, accessible via any internet-connected computer.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental
Experimental-arm providers will complete four simulated patient cases (CPVs) with two additions described in the next column:
Experimental Arm
* First, these providers will receive educational materials (e.g. a slide deck) meant to mimic what physicians will receive in the real-world market as they learn about the Progenity technology.
* Second, within each of their four cases, intervention-arm physicians only will receive simulated test results from the Progenity PE test at the clinically-appropriate point in each case.
Control
These providers will complete four simulated patient cases (CPVs) only.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Experimental Arm
* First, these providers will receive educational materials (e.g. a slide deck) meant to mimic what physicians will receive in the real-world market as they learn about the Progenity technology.
* Second, within each of their four cases, intervention-arm physicians only will receive simulated test results from the Progenity PE test at the clinically-appropriate point in each case.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Averaging at least 20 hours per week of clinical duties over the last six months
3. English speaking
4. Access to the internet
5. Informed, signed and voluntarily consented to be in the study
Exclusion Criteria
2. Averaging less than 20 hours per week of clinical duties over the last six months
3. Non-English speaking
4. Unable to access the internet
5. Do not voluntarily consent to be in the study
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Progenity, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Qure Healthcare, LLC
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John Peabody, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
President, QURE Healthcare
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
QURE Healthcare
San Francisco, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Jain S, Hansen J, Spell M, Lee M. Measuring the quality of physician practice by using clinical vignettes: a prospective validation study. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Nov 16;141(10):771-80. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-10-200411160-00008.
Peabody JW, Strand V, Shimkhada R, Lee R, Chernoff D. Impact of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity test on clinical practice. PLoS One. 2013 May 7;8(5):e63215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063215. Print 2013.
Peabody J, Martin M, DeMaria L, Florentino J, Paculdo D, Paul M, Vanzo R, Wassman ER, Burgon T. Clinical Utility of a Comprehensive, Whole Genome CMA Testing Platform in Pediatrics: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Simulated Patients in Physician Practices. PLoS One. 2016 Dec 30;11(12):e0169064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169064. eCollection 2016.
Solon O, Woo K, Quimbo SA, Shimkhada R, Florentino J, Peabody JW. A novel method for measuring health care system performance: experience from QIDS in the Philippines. Health Policy Plan. 2009 May;24(3):167-74. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czp003. Epub 2009 Feb 18.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
01PRO2019
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.