Comparing Different Methods of Patient Education on Preeclampsia
NCT ID: NCT02765906
Last Updated: 2020-07-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
150 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-05-31
2017-07-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A number of studies have shown that patient knowledge about preeclampsia is poor and that patient education can improve patient awareness. The investigators would like to find out what type of patient education is most effective. The investigators propose a three arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) where the first arm will receive a graphic card depicting signs and symptoms of preeclampsia, the second arm will watch an educational video on preeclampsia, and the third arm will have no visual form of patient education; they will be exposed only to the counseling they receive with their routine prenatal care. The card and video were both developed by the Preeclampsia Foundation and in a prior RCT the card was shown to be a useful educational intervention. This study would expand on this previous data by comparing the graphic card to an informational video available on the Preeclampsia Foundation's website (http://www.preeclampsia.org/component/allvideoshare/video/featured/7-symptoms-every-pregnant-woman-should-know?Itemid=479). The effectiveness of this video has not yet been tested as an educational tool. Patients in the arm receiving the graphic card for educational intervention will be allowed to keep this card. Primiparous patients seen in the ambulatory prenatal clinic and Maternal Fetal Medicine (MFM) clinic will be enrolled at 18w0d-24w6d gestation. At the time of enrollment baseline preeclampsia knowledge, demographics, and patient anxiety before and after initial exposure to the educational interventions will be assessed. A follow up assessment of knowledge of preeclampsia will be obtained at 32-36 weeks gestation to measure retention of knowledge. Patient medical records will be reviewed for delivery outcomes which will be recorded and compared.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Preeclampsia Educational Program Study (PrEPS)
NCT06373367
Improving Patient Understanding of Preeclampsia
NCT01119183
Education and Counseling Program on Pregnant Women With Risk of Preeclampsia
NCT04036786
Family Study on Preeclampsia
NCT00344162
Heart Health 4 Moms Trial to Reduce CVD Risk After Preeclampsia
NCT02147626
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
No intervention
No additional education
No interventions assigned to this group
Graphic card
Education with graphic card
Graphic card
A randomized controlled trial comparing patient education on preeclampsia with a graphic card vs. patient education with a written pamphlet vs. no patient education showed that patient education improved significantly when patients were provided with a graphic card depicting signs and symptoms of preeclampsia and that this improvement occurred regardless of health literacy score (You WB, Wolf MS, Bailey SC, Grobman WA. Improving patient understanding of preeclampsia: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics \& Gynecology. 2012;206:431.e1-431.e5.). The graphic card is now available on the Preeclampsia Foundation's website (http://www.preeclampsia.org/market-place/educational-illustrated-signs-symptoms-pad-detail).
Video
Education with video
Video
This an informational video available on the Preeclampsia Foundation's website (http://www.preeclampsia.org/component/allvideoshare/video/featured/7-symptoms-every-pregnant-woman-should-know?Itemid=479). The effectiveness of this video has not yet been tested as an educational tool.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Graphic card
A randomized controlled trial comparing patient education on preeclampsia with a graphic card vs. patient education with a written pamphlet vs. no patient education showed that patient education improved significantly when patients were provided with a graphic card depicting signs and symptoms of preeclampsia and that this improvement occurred regardless of health literacy score (You WB, Wolf MS, Bailey SC, Grobman WA. Improving patient understanding of preeclampsia: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics \& Gynecology. 2012;206:431.e1-431.e5.). The graphic card is now available on the Preeclampsia Foundation's website (http://www.preeclampsia.org/market-place/educational-illustrated-signs-symptoms-pad-detail).
Video
This an informational video available on the Preeclampsia Foundation's website (http://www.preeclampsia.org/component/allvideoshare/video/featured/7-symptoms-every-pregnant-woman-should-know?Itemid=479). The effectiveness of this video has not yet been tested as an educational tool.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* English speaking
* Patients at Geisinger Medical Center prenatal clinic
* Patients at Geisinger Medical Center and Forty Fort Maternal Fetal Medicine clinics
Exclusion Criteria
* Non-English speaking
* Significant hearing loss/disability
* Blind or with severe visual impairment
* Do not have adequate capacity to give consent
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Geisinger Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael J Paglia, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Geisinger Clinic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Geisinger Medical Center: Maternal Fetal Medicine and Prenatal Clinics
Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
Geisinger Maternal Fetal Medicine
Forty Fort, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
You WB, Wolf MS, Bailey SC, Grobman WA. Improving patient understanding of preeclampsia: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 May;206(5):431.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.03.006. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
Firoz T, Sanghvi H, Merialdi M, von Dadelszen P. Pre-eclampsia in low and middle income countries. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2011 Aug;25(4):537-48. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2011.04.002. Epub 2011 May 17.
Tsigas E, Magee LA. Advocacy organisations as partners in pre-eclampsia progress: patient involvement improves outcomes. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2011 Aug;25(4):523-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2011.03.001. Epub 2011 May 12.
Ogunyemi D, Benae JL, Ukatu C. Is eclampsia preventable? A case control review of consecutive cases from an urban underserved region. South Med J. 2004 May;97(5):440-5. doi: 10.1097/00007611-200405000-00005.
Walker MG, Windrim C, Ellul KN, Kingdom JCP. Web-based education for placental complications of pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Apr;35(4):334-339. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30961-0.
You WB, Wolf M, Bailey SC, Pandit AU, Waite KR, Sobel RM, Grobman W. Factors associated with patient understanding of preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2012;31(3):341-9. doi: 10.3109/10641955.2010.507851. Epub 2010 Sep 22.
Maimburg RD, Vaeth M, Hvidman L, Durr J, Olsen J. Women's worries in first pregnancy: results from a randomised controlled trial. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2013 Dec;4(4):129-31. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2013.10.001. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
Muller C, Cameron LD. Trait anxiety, information modality, and responses to communications about prenatal genetic testing. J Behav Med. 2014 Oct;37(5):988-99. doi: 10.1007/s10865-014-9555-8. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
Muthusamy AD, Leuthner S, Gaebler-Uhing C, Hoffmann RG, Li SH, Basir MA. Supplemental written information improves prenatal counseling: a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2012 May;129(5):e1269-74. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1702. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
Marteau TM, Bekker H. The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Br J Clin Psychol. 1992 Sep;31(3):301-6. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1992.tb00997.x.
Hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;122(5):1122-1131. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000437382.03963.88. No abstract available.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016-0116
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.