H-coil TMS to Reduce Pain: A Pilot Study Evaluating Relative Efficacy of the H1 vs H7 Coil
NCT ID: NCT04203199
Last Updated: 2023-09-15
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
39 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-01-18
2022-10-06
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of rTMS and H Coil in Neuropathic Pain
NCT03370107
Role of the Supraspinal Opioidergic Circuit in Prefrontal TMS-Induced Analgesia
NCT01643798
Using rTMS to Explore Neural Mechanisms of Stress-Induced Opioid Use
NCT04181515
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Equipment Testing and Pilot Study
NCT02231892
RTMS for Treatment of Pain and Craving
NCT03310138
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Acute pain is associated with elevated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal in targets of ascending nociceptive fibers including the insula, dorsal anterior cingulate (dACC), thalamus and somatosensory cortex - the 'Pain Network'. Perceived pain, and corresponding BOLD signal in the Pain Network, is attenuated by 10 Hz rTMS (a form of brain stimulation that results in long term potentiation (LTP) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC, a node of the Executive Control Network). Dr. Borckardt was the first person to demonstrate that when LTP-like dlPFC rTMS was delivered in the postoperative recovery room, patients used less morphine in the hospital and require less morphine long-term. These analgesic effects are now widely known, with over 33 clinical trials utilizing rTMS as a tool to decrease acute and chronic pain in various clinical populations.
These data all suggest that LTP-like DLPFC rTMS is a very strong candidate alleviating chronic pain (LTP-like dlPFC rTMS (Strategy 1, Aim 1)). An alternative approach, however, \*which may also target opiate craving\*, is to attenuate the Pain Network (through long term depression (LTD) of the ventromedial PFC) (LTD-like mPFC rTMS, Strategy 2, Aim 1). In a cohort of 49 individuals with chronic pain, Dr. Hanlon (Primary Investigator) recently demonstrated that LTD-like mPFC rTMS reduced baseline BOLD signal in multiple regions of interest (ROIs) \*involved in craving which also overlap with the Pain Network\* (e.g. dACC and Insula). To parametrically evaluate these 2 promising treatment strategies, the investigator has developed a 1-visit cross-sectional design wherein a cohort of healthy control individuals will receive Quantitative Sensory Testing before and after rTMS with the H1 and H7-coil for dlPFC stimulation (Strategy 1) and mPFC depression (Strategy 2), respectively. The investigator aims to:
Aim 1. Quantify the effects of LTP-like and LTD-like RTMS on Quantitative Sensory Testing Hypothesis: The pressure pain tolerance of individuals in these two groups will increase after one session of rTMS administered by the H1- and H7-coil design.
Aim 2. Evaluate the effects of rTMS on subjective experience of discomfort. Hypothesis: Subjective experience of discomfort will decrease in individuals after one session of LTP-like or LTD-like rTMS administered to the dlPFC and mPFC, respectively.
The relative efficacy of Strategy 1 vs 2 will directly translate to development of a large clinical trial of rTMS as an innovative, new treatment option for pain in opiate dependent individuals.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
First H1 coil, then H7 coil
There will be 1 screening and 2 TMS visits. The procedures will be identical for each TMS visit, except for the type of TMS delivered (H1 or H7 coil). Each participant will be assigned to both coils, with TMS type. Participants assigned to this arm will receive the H1 coil at TMS visit 1, H7 coil at TMS visit 2
Real rTMS to the mPFC using H7 Coil
This will be delivered with the Brainsway H7 coil system; 1200 pulses with the H7 coil helmet. Blinded using active/sham operator cards.
Real rTMS to the dlPFC using H1 Coil
This will be delivered with the Brainsway H1 coil system; 3000 pulses with the H1 coil helmet. Blinded using active/sham operator cards.
First H7 coil, then H1 coil
There will be 1 screening and 2 TMS visits. The procedures will be identical for each TMS visit, except for the type of TMS delivered (H1 or H7 coil). Each participant will be assigned to both coils, with TMS type. Participants assigned to this arm will receive the H7 coil at TMS visit 1, H1 coil at TMS visit 2.
Real rTMS to the mPFC using H7 Coil
This will be delivered with the Brainsway H7 coil system; 1200 pulses with the H7 coil helmet. Blinded using active/sham operator cards.
Real rTMS to the dlPFC using H1 Coil
This will be delivered with the Brainsway H1 coil system; 3000 pulses with the H1 coil helmet. Blinded using active/sham operator cards.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Real rTMS to the mPFC using H7 Coil
This will be delivered with the Brainsway H7 coil system; 1200 pulses with the H7 coil helmet. Blinded using active/sham operator cards.
Real rTMS to the dlPFC using H1 Coil
This will be delivered with the Brainsway H1 coil system; 3000 pulses with the H1 coil helmet. Blinded using active/sham operator cards.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Does not have a history of and is currently not experiencing chronic pain.
3. Able to read and understand questionnaires and informed consent.
4. Lives within 50 miles of the study site.
5. Is not at elevated risk of seizure (i.e., does not have a history of seizures, is not currently prescribed medications known to lower seizure threshold).
6. Does not have a history of traumatic brain injury, including a head injury that resulted in hospitalization, loss of consciousness for more than 10 minutes, or having ever been informed that they have an epidural, subdural, or subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Meets DSM-V criteria for moderate substance dependence, current axis I disorders of major depression, panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post traumatic stress syndrome, bipolar affective disorder, schizophrenia, dissociate disorders, eating disorders, and any other psychotic disorder.
3. Has current suicidal ideation or homicidal ideation.
4. Has the need for maintenance or acute treatment with any psychoactive medication including anti-seizure medications and medications for ADHD.
5. Females of childbearing potential who are pregnant (by urine HCG), nursing, or who are not using a reliable form of birth control.
6. Has current charges pending for a violent crime (not including DUI related offenses).
7. Suffers from chronic migraines.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Colleen Hanlon, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB00062742
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.