A Study to Evaluate the Safety of bb2121 in Subjects With High Risk, Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM)
NCT ID: NCT04196491
Last Updated: 2023-08-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
13 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-05-27
2023-06-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy and Safety Study of bb2121 Versus Standard Regimens in Subjects With Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
NCT03651128
Safety and Efficacy of bb2121 (Ide-cel) Combinations in Multiple Myeloma
NCT04855136
An Efficacy and Safety Study of bb2121 in Subjects With Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma and in Subjects With High-Risk Multiple Myeloma
NCT03601078
Efficacy and Safety Study of bb2121 in Subjects With Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma
NCT03361748
Treatment for Elderly Fit Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Aged Between 65 and 80 Years
NCT03742297
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Dose Escalation
* bb2121 autologous CAR T cells will be infused at a dose ranging from 150 - 800 x 10\^6 CAR+ T cells after receiving lymphodepleting chemotherapy with a planned starting dose of 450 x 10\^6 CAR+ T cells.
* Lenalidomide maintenance therapy is recommended for all patients and should be initiated upon adequate bone marrow recovery or from 90-day post-bb2121 infusion, whichever is later
bb2121
CAR-T Cell Therapy
Fludarabine
Lymphodepleting Chemotherapy
Cyclophosphamide
Lymphodepleting Chemotherapy
Lenalidomide
Maintenance Therapy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
bb2121
CAR-T Cell Therapy
Fludarabine
Lymphodepleting Chemotherapy
Cyclophosphamide
Lymphodepleting Chemotherapy
Lenalidomide
Maintenance Therapy
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Subject is newly diagnosed and has symptomatic Multiple Myeloma (MM) prior to initiating induction anti-myeloma therapy
2. Subject is ≥ 18 years of age at the time of initial diagnosis of MM
3. Subject has measurable disease at initial diagnosis by
* M-protein and/or
* Light chain MM without measurable disease in the serum or urine
4. Subject has high-risk MM at the time of initial diagnosis of MM per R-ISS Stage III as defined by IMWG:
* ISS Stage III and cytogenetic abnormalities with t(4; 14) and/or del(17p); and/or t(14:16) by iFISH; or;
* ISS Stage III and serum LDH \> ULN
5. Subject has Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance ≤ 1
6. Subjects has received ≤ to 3 cycles of the following induction anti-myeloma therapy prior to enrollment:
* Cycle 1: one of the following regimens (RVd, KRd, CyBorD, D-RVd and D-KRd)
* Cycle 2 to Cycle 3: either KRd or RVd (Cycle 3 must be without dexamethasone)
Exclusion Criteria
At initial diagnosis, screening and prior to initiation of induction therapy for MM:
1. Subject has non-secretory MM
During Screening:
2. Subject received any treatments for MM other than up to 3 cycles of induction therapy per protocol
3. Subject has any of the following laboratory abnormalities:
1. Absolute neutrophil count \< 1,000/μL
2. Platelet count \< 50,000 mm3
3. Hemoglobin \< 8 g/dL (\< 4.9 mmol/L)
4. Serum creatinine clearance \< 45 mL/min
5. Corrected serum calcium \> 13.5 mg/dL (\> 3.4 mmol/L)
6. Serum aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase \> 2.5 × upper limit of normal
7. Serum total bilirubin \> 1.5 × ULN or \> 3.0 mg/dL for subjects with documented Gilbert's syndrome
8. INR or aPTT \> 1.5 × ULN
4. Subject has history or presence of clinically significant CNS pathology
5. Subjects has high risk for developing deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolus and are unable or unwilling to undergo anti-thrombotic therapy
6. Subject has peripheral neuropathy of \> Grade 2 severity according to the NCI CTCAE Version 4.03 with bortezomib based induction regimen
7. Subjects has moderate or severe pulmonary hypertension
8. Subject has intolerance to components of induction regimen (KRd or RVd) or has any contraindication to one or the other drug
9. Subject has not recovered from induction therapy-related toxicities (non-hematologic) to \< grade 1 CTCAE at the time of screening
10. Subject has prior history of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolus (PE) within 6 months of starting study treatment
11. Subject has cardiac conditions such as:
1. Echocardiogram or multi gated acquisition assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction \< 45%
2. Subject has a history of clinically significant cardiovascular disease or clinically significant ECG abnormalities
12. Subject has Pulmonary conditions such as:
1. Subject has known chronic obstructive pulmonary with a forced expiratory vol in 1 sec 50% of predicted normal.
2. Inadequate pulmonary function defined as oxygen saturation \< 92 % on room air
13. Subject needs ongoing treatment with chronic immunosuppressants
14. Subject has history of primary immunodeficiency
15. Subject is seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus, chronic or active hepatitis B or active hepatitis A or C
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Celgene
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Local Institution - 119
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Local Institution - 110
Los Angeles, California, United States
Local Institution - 116
San Francisco, California, United States
Local Institution - 106
Denver, Colorado, United States
Local Institution - 101
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Local Institution - 113
Tampa, Florida, United States
Local Institution - 108
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Local Institution - 123
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Local Institution - 115
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Local Institution - 122
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Local Institution - 117
Hackensack, New Jersey, United States
Local Institution - 121
New York, New York, United States
Local Institution - 109
New York, New York, United States
Local Institution - 124
New York, New York, United States
Local Institution - 120
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Local Institution - 112
Portland, Oregon, United States
Local Institution - 118
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Local Institution - 103
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Local Institution - 102
Dallas, Texas, United States
Local Institution - 114
Houston, Texas, United States
Local Institution - 104
Seattle, Washington, United States
Local Institution - 107
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Parmar H, Vesole DH, Biran N. From VAD to VRD: Is Transplant Still Needed in the Upfront Setting of Myeloma? Cancer J. 2021 May-Jun 01;27(3):190-195. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000522.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
BMS Clinical Trial Information
FDA Safety Alerts and Recalls
BMS Clinical Trial Patient Recruiting
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
U1111-1243-5088
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
BB2121-MM-004
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.