Deep Learning for Prostate Segmentation

NCT ID: NCT04191980

Last Updated: 2019-12-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

62 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-02-01

Study Completion Date

2020-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Because the diagnostic criteria for prostate cancer are different in the peripheral and the transition zone, prostate segmentation is needed for any computer-aided diagnosis system aimed at characterizing prostate lesions on magnetic resonance (MR) images. Manual segmentation is time consuming and may differ between radiologists with different expertise. We developed and trained a convolutional neural network algorithm for segmenting the whole prostate, the transition zone and the anterior fibromuscular stroma on T2-weighted images of 787 MRIs from an existing prospective radiological pathological correlation database containing prostate MRI of patients treated by prostatectomy between 2008 and 2014 (CLARA-P database).

The purpose of this study is to validate this algorithm on an independent cohort of patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients with a MRI on a 3 Tesla (T) unit

The total validation cohort is composed of axial T2-weighted images of the prostate obtained from 31 prostate MRIs on a 3T unit randomly chosen among the prostate MRIs performed at the Hospices Civils de Lyon in 20162015-2019

Comparison of prostate multi-zone segmentation obtained with an automatic deep learning-based algorithm and two expert radiologists

Intervention Type OTHER

The algorithm is used to perform a multizone segmentation of the prostate including delineation of : the whole prostate contours, the transition zone contours, the anterior fibromuscular stroma.

The contours is independently corrected by 2 radiologists. The corrected contours of the different zones will be stored and for each zone 6 different metrics will be used to evaluate the difference between the initial and corrected contours:

* Mean Mesh Distance: Average Boundary Distance (ABD) for each point of the reference segmentation. The distance to the closest point of the compared segmentation is first computed. Then the average of all these distances is computed and gives the ABD
* General Hausdorff distance (HD)
* 95% percentile (P) of the HD and the 95th (P) of the asymmetric HD distribution
* 95% HD modified (HD95\_1): different approach by first computing the 95th (P) of the asymmetric HD then taking the maximum
* Dice coefficient
* Difference in volumes

Patients with a MRI on a 1.5 Tesla unit

The total validation cohort is composed of axial T2-weighted images of the prostate obtained from 31 prostate MRIs on a 1.5T unit randomly chosen among the prostate MRIs performed at the Hospices Civils de Lyon in 20162015-2019

Comparison of prostate multi-zone segmentation obtained with an automatic deep learning-based algorithm and two expert radiologists

Intervention Type OTHER

The algorithm is used to perform a multizone segmentation of the prostate including delineation of : the whole prostate contours, the transition zone contours, the anterior fibromuscular stroma.

The contours is independently corrected by 2 radiologists. The corrected contours of the different zones will be stored and for each zone 6 different metrics will be used to evaluate the difference between the initial and corrected contours:

* Mean Mesh Distance: Average Boundary Distance (ABD) for each point of the reference segmentation. The distance to the closest point of the compared segmentation is first computed. Then the average of all these distances is computed and gives the ABD
* General Hausdorff distance (HD)
* 95% percentile (P) of the HD and the 95th (P) of the asymmetric HD distribution
* 95% HD modified (HD95\_1): different approach by first computing the 95th (P) of the asymmetric HD then taking the maximum
* Dice coefficient
* Difference in volumes

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Comparison of prostate multi-zone segmentation obtained with an automatic deep learning-based algorithm and two expert radiologists

The algorithm is used to perform a multizone segmentation of the prostate including delineation of : the whole prostate contours, the transition zone contours, the anterior fibromuscular stroma.

The contours is independently corrected by 2 radiologists. The corrected contours of the different zones will be stored and for each zone 6 different metrics will be used to evaluate the difference between the initial and corrected contours:

* Mean Mesh Distance: Average Boundary Distance (ABD) for each point of the reference segmentation. The distance to the closest point of the compared segmentation is first computed. Then the average of all these distances is computed and gives the ABD
* General Hausdorff distance (HD)
* 95% percentile (P) of the HD and the 95th (P) of the asymmetric HD distribution
* 95% HD modified (HD95\_1): different approach by first computing the 95th (P) of the asymmetric HD then taking the maximum
* Dice coefficient
* Difference in volumes

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Prostate MRI contained in the PACS of the Hospices Civils de Lyon
* Performed in 2016-2019

Exclusion Criteria

* MRIs from patients who already had treatment for prostate cancer
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospices Civils de Lyon

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

HĂ´pital Edouard Herriot

Lyon, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Olivier ROUVIERE, Pr

Role: CONTACT

472 11 61 67 ext. +33

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Olivier ROUVIERE, Pr

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GOPI-Segmentation_2019

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Artificial Intelligence & Prostate Cancer
NCT06298305 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING