Anterior Advantage With KINCISE

NCT ID: NCT04191733

Last Updated: 2023-09-15

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

250 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-01-28

Study Completion Date

2022-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a post-market prospective, 1:1 randomized, multicenter non-inferiority study to compare the femoral broaching time for THA with the Anterior Advantage approach with KINCISE vs. without KINCISE. Follow-up will continue through 24 weeks post-op.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The primary endpoint is femoral broaching time (in minutes), which is collected intraoperatively. The primary objective is to demonstrate that femoral broaching time with KINCISE is non-inferior to femoral broaching time with manual instruments (not using KINCISE) when used in THA with Anterior Advantage.

Note: If non-inferiority is successfully demonstrated, then the study will be deemed to be successful, and a test for superiority of femoral broaching time will be conducted.

If the primary endpoint analysis successfully demonstrates non-inferiority of femoral broaching time, then the following three secondary objectives will be assessed with formal hypotheses, in order, under a gatekeeping strategy:

* Non-inferiority of skin-to-skin OR time when KINCISE is used vs. when KINCISE is not used.
* Non-inferiority of the percent of subjects with optimal acetabular cup abduction angle when KINCISE is used vs. when KINCISE is not used.
* Non-inferiority of the percent of subjects with optimal acetabular cup version angle when KINCISE is used vs. when KINCISE is not used.

In addition, the following secondary endpoints do not have prospectively planned hypotheses; these will be summarized for both treatment groups:

* Harris Hip Score (HHS) and HHS change from preoperative baseline
* Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and FJS change from 6-week postoperative baseline
* EQ-5D-5L and changes in these assessments from preoperative baseline
* Pain (Groin, Thigh, and Buttock)
* Patient Satisfaction
* Post-op time when functional activities can be accomplished (return to work, self-care, etc.)
* Radiographic Outcomes (based upon AP Hip, AP Pelvis, and Lateral)
* Length of hospital stay after index THA
* Re-hospitalizations during the study (including a specific summary of re-hospitalizations within 90 days)
* Narcotic drug usage throughout the study (participant reported)
* Complications (including a specific summary of complications within 90 days post-surgery)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis Rheumatoid Arthritis Post Traumatic Arthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

1:1 Block Randomization
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Anterior Approach with KINCISE

Anterior Approach THA using KINCISE(TM) Surgical Automated System

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

KINCISE(TM) Surgical Automated System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty via Anterior Approach with and without the KINCISE(TM) Surgical Automated System

Anterior Approach without KINCISE

Anterior Approach THA with a mallet (without KINCISE)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

KINCISE(TM) Surgical Automated System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty via Anterior Approach with and without the KINCISE(TM) Surgical Automated System

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

KINCISE(TM) Surgical Automated System

Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty via Anterior Approach with and without the KINCISE(TM) Surgical Automated System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. The patient is undergoing a standard of care primary cementless hip replacement with the Pinnacle cup and a Corail or Actis stem via the Anterior Advantage approach. All devices are to be used according to the approved indications.
2. Individuals who are able to speak, read, and comprehend the Institutional Review Board approved Informed Consent Document and willing and able to provide informed patient consent for participation in the study and have authorized the transfer of his/her information to DePuy Synthes.
3. Individuals who are willing and able to complete follow-up visits and questionnaires as specified by the study protocol.
4. Individuals who are not bedridden per the discretion of the investigator (The intent of "not bedridden" means a permanent situation, not a temporary situation as in a hip fracture or trauma case).
5. Individuals who are a minimum age of 21 years at the time of consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Active local or systemic infection.
2. Loss of musculature, neuromuscular compromise or vascular deficiency in the affected limb rendering the procedure unjustified.
3. Poor bone quality, such as osteoporosis, where, in the surgeon's opinion, there could be considerable migration of the prosthesis or a significant chance of fracture of the femoral shaft and/or the lack of adequate bone to support the implant(s).
4. Charcot's or Paget's disease.
5. The Subject is a woman who is pregnant or lactating.
6. Subject had a contralateral amputation.
7. Previous partial hip replacement in affected hip.
8. Subject has participated in a clinical investigation with an investigational product (drug or device) in the last three months.
9. Contralateral hip was replaced less than 3 months prior to surgery date, contralateral hip is already enrolled in the study, or simultaneous or staged hip replacement is planned
10. Subject is currently involved in any personal injury litigation, medical-legal or worker's compensation claims.
11. Subject was diagnosed and is taking prescription medications to treat a muscular disorder that limits mobility due to severe stiffness and pain such as fibromyalgia or polymyalgia.
12. Subject has a medical condition with less than 2 years of life expectancy.
13. Subject, in the opinion of the Investigator, is a drug or alcohol abuser or has a physical or psychological disorder that could affect their ability to complete patient reported questionnaires or be compliant with follow-up requirements.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

DePuy Orthopaedics

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Orthopedic Specialty Center of Northern California

Roseville, California, United States

Site Status

Colorado Joint Replacement

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Capital Region Orthopaedic Group

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Hospital for Special Surgery

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Columbia University Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Carolina Orthopaedic & Sports Medicine

Gastonia, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Southern Joint Replacement Institute

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Texas Institute for Hip and Knee Surgery

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

W.B. Carrell Memorial Clinic

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

North Texas Medical Research Institute

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Jordan-Young Institute

Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DSJ_2019_03

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.