The Effect of Fertilized ACL Technique on Outcomes of ACL Reconstruction in Young Adults

NCT ID: NCT04178538

Last Updated: 2022-04-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-12-01

Study Completion Date

2023-11-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A prospective study, with outcomes including re-rupture rate and return to sport will be collected following ACL reconstruction. In keeping with the surgeon's standard practice, patients 24 years and under that are skeletally mature, will receive a quad tendon autograft; patients 25 years of age and over will receive an allograft All-Inside ACL reconstruction. These two cohorts will then be randomized into two groups, one with bone marrow/DBM and InternalBrace augmentation, and one without. The study procedures will involve use of x-rays, MRI, CT scan, and surveys at varying time points to assess radiographic, imaging and clinical outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Graft re-rupture is one of the major complications and causes of reoperation after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. This is more common in younger athletes. Based on the recent literature the rate of graft re-rupture is about 6-11%. Even with newer techniques and different types of grafts the re-rupture rates and return to play have not improved significantly. Athletes younger than 25 years old have been found to have a 23% risk of secondary ACL injury either on the contralateral or ipsilateral side after an ACL reconstruction. Therefore, there is a direct need to improve the outcomes of ACL reconstruction especially in younger athletes. This could be accomplished with earlier biologic incorporation of the graft and further protecting the graft during the early postoperative period. Quad tendon all-inside reconstruction is a reproducible technique for younger athletes receiving surgery. For patients over the age of 22, allograft is commonly used. Recently autogenous bone marrow aspirate has shown superior radiographic incorporation when used for osteochondral allograft transplantation in the knee. The bone marrow aspirate has also shown the presence of similar mesenchymal stem cell concentrations when harvested from the proximal tibia compared to when harvested from the iliac crest; providing a useful and safe alternative during knee surgery. This bone marrow aspirate can be combined with demineralized bone matrix (DBM) as a medium for incorporation into a femoral and tibial tunnel during reconstruction of an ACL. Recently, as an augment to the procedure, an ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene/polyester suture tape was used as an InternalBrace for an ACL allograft reconstruction and found to be safe and effective. The hypothesis of this study is that the combination of the InternalBrace and biologic addition of autogenous bone marrow aspirate may provide improved functional outcomes, and reduced failure rates after ACL reconstruction.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

ACL Tear ACL Injury Arthroscopy Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

25 years and older- ACL recon with DBM, Internal brace

Patients in this arm will be 25 years of age and over and receive ACL reconstruction augmented with demineralized bone matrix, bone marrow, and internal brace

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ACL reconstruction with bone marrow, demineralized bone marix, and internal brace augmentation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ACL reconstruction with bone marrow, demineralized bone marix, and internal brace augmentation with all inside technique

25 years and older- Standard ACL reconstruction

Patients in this arm will be 25 years of age and over will receive an allograft All-Inside ACL reconstruction

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard ACL reconstruction with all inside technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Standard ACL reconstruction with all inside technique

24 years and younger- ACL recon with DBM, Internal brace

In this arm patients 24 years and under that are skeletally mature, will receive ACL reconstruction with a quad tendon autograft augmented with demineralized bone matrix, bone marrow, and internal brace

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ACL reconstruction with bone marrow, demineralized bone marix, and internal brace augmentation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ACL reconstruction with bone marrow, demineralized bone marix, and internal brace augmentation with all inside technique

24 years and younger- Standard ACL reconstruction

In this arm patients 24 years and under that are skeletally mature, will receive ACL reconstruction with a quad tendon autograft standard all inside technique

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard ACL reconstruction with all inside technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Standard ACL reconstruction with all inside technique

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ACL reconstruction with bone marrow, demineralized bone marix, and internal brace augmentation

ACL reconstruction with bone marrow, demineralized bone marix, and internal brace augmentation with all inside technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Standard ACL reconstruction with all inside technique

Standard ACL reconstruction with all inside technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients must be age 14-60 years old.
* Must be skeletally mature (Tanner 4) patients, with an ACL deficient knee who desire to have ACL reconstructive surgery using autograft or allograft augmentation.

Exclusion Criteria

* An understanding of the purpose of the study, and have signed the informed consent.
* Able to return for all subsequent study visits


* Patients with multi-ligament surgery (MCL, PCL, LCL, PMC, or PLC repair or reconstruction),
* Patients whom have had previous ACL reconstructive surgery on ipsilateral knee.
* Patients who are currently pregnant or nursing.
* Patients who have a current infection at the operative site.
* Any condition or personal issue that the surgeon deems ineffective to the outcome of the study.
* Workmen's compensation cases
Minimum Eligible Age

14 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Arthrex, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Marshall University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Chad Lavender, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Marshall University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Marshall University Department of Orthopedics

Huntington, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Crawford SN, Waterman BR, Lubowitz JH. Long-term failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2013 Sep;29(9):1566-71. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.04.014. Epub 2013 Jun 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23820260 (View on PubMed)

Wiggins AJ, Grandhi RK, Schneider DK, Stanfield D, Webster KE, Myer GD. Risk of Secondary Injury in Younger Athletes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jul;44(7):1861-76. doi: 10.1177/0363546515621554. Epub 2016 Jan 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26772611 (View on PubMed)

Smith PA, Bley JA. Allograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Utilizing Internal Brace Augmentation. Arthrosc Tech. 2016 Oct 10;5(5):e1143-e1147. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2016.06.007. eCollection 2016 Oct.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28224069 (View on PubMed)

Narbona-Carceles J, Vaquero J, Suarez-Sancho S, Forriol F, Fernandez-Santos ME. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell aspirates from alternative sources: is the knee as good as the iliac crest? Injury. 2014 Oct;45 Suppl 4:S42-7. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(14)70009-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25384474 (View on PubMed)

Oladeji LO, Stannard JP, Cook CR, Kfuri M, Crist BD, Smith MJ, Cook JL. Effects of Autogenous Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate on Radiographic Integration of Femoral Condylar Osteochondral Allografts. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Oct;45(12):2797-2803. doi: 10.1177/0363546517715725. Epub 2017 Jul 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28737949 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1455859

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Timing of Damage Control Orthopedic Surgery
NCT05785143 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING