3D Printed Rigid Bolus Versus Silicone Bolus for Treatment of Tumors Involving the Skin: A Comparative Study
NCT ID: NCT04176900
Last Updated: 2023-10-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-03-31
2023-09-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
3D Printed Implants for the Defect Reconstruction in Patients With Chest Wall Tumors
NCT05057143
A Study Utilizing 3D Printing in Patients Undergoing External Beam Radiation Therapy
NCT02970474
Acquisition of 3D Facial Geometry of Patients' Scheduled for Radiotherapy Treatment
NCT02930915
Radiation in Stage I or Stage II Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer That Cannot Be Removed by Surgery
NCT00346320
Tumor-Treating Fields Therapy in Preventing Brain Tumors in Participants With Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT03607682
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There are many types of boluses used internationally from rubber to candle wax slabs. The bolus allows the radiation dose to build up so that a sufficient dose is deposited at the skin. Use of bolus for cancers involving the skin is considered the standard of care when using conventional MV radiotherapy.
Challenges of Using Conventional Bolus Many standard boluses are slightly flexible, but are not able to follow significant changes in the underlying contours. When a bolus is not able to follow an individual's unique 'peaks and valleys' in contour, it can lead to air gaps between the bolus and the skin. An air gap, which is easily seen during imaging, can also vary on a day-to-day basis due to slight changes in positioning of the bolus prior to radiotherapy treatment. The varying air gaps can affect how much radiation dose is getting to the skin, and can potentially lead to under-dosing of the cancer cells in the skin. Even small air gaps (i.e. 5mm in thickness), can cause a 5% error in dose, which exceeds the safe tolerance for treatment.
Areas where this can be a problem are where the patient's anatomy undergoes significant topographical changes in a small area. Examples of this include the ear, nose, top of head. Patients with metastatic cancer can also have large lymph nodes or masses that are growing towards the skin that can be difficult to accommodate with standard bolus materials.
3D-Printed Bolus One method to overcome challenging anatomy for cases that require skin bolus for radiotherapy is the use of 3D-printed bolus. This technology uses data acquired from a CT scan of the affected area. The patients contour can then be used to create an individualized bolus that matches the patient contour for the treatment field. This technology has been demonstrated to improve fit (less air gaps) and decreased radiotherapy treatment time. The bolus used in this study was rigid.
Trial design and Rationale Other than the chestwall study, the literature on 3D-printed bolus for radiotherapy has focused on the dosimetry and feasibility of using this technology. However, it is used in an ad hoc method in many centers, using various workflows. There are no studies examining which type of bolus provides the best radiotherapy plan, is the easiest to use at the radiation therapy machines or which is preferred by patients.
To fill this gap, this study will aim to answer a few questions. It will compare the use of rigid 3D-printed bolus (most commonly used and reported in the literature) versus a flexible silicone 3D-printed bolus. Both types of bolus will be used to treat patients with cancers involving the skin. This will allow comparison of radiotherapy plans for each patient between the two types of bolus where each subject is his/her own control. The study will also collect data about real-time set-up using each bolus and feedback from radiation therapists (deliver radiation treatments) about the ease of use of each. Lastly, patients will complete a short survey to provide feedback about comfort with use of each type of bolus and to determine if one type of bolus is favored over the other.
This data will be instrumental is determining the standard of care of the use of 3D-printed bolus as it will assess two types of bolus in three domains: ability to help generate an adequate radiotherapy plan, ease of use by the specialists that deliver the radiotherapy (radiation therapists) and patient reported feedback.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Alternating 3D boluses
Both rigid and flexible 3D printed boluses made for each patient. Each is used on alternate days during radiation therapy.
Ingeo Biopolymer (PLA)
Biopolymer used for 3D-printing of rigid bolus
Ecoflex 030
Polymer used for the 3D-printed flexible bolus
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ingeo Biopolymer (PLA)
Biopolymer used for 3D-printing of rigid bolus
Ecoflex 030
Polymer used for the 3D-printed flexible bolus
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Being treated with radiation therapy that requires the use of bolus to ensure adequate radiotherapy dose to the skin in the affected area
* Planned for palliative or curative intent radiotherapy using megavoltage (MV) photons
* Site of involvement has significant contour change, leading to anticipated challenges using conventional bolus material
* Patient must be competent and able to complete informed consent
* Age ≥ 18
* Women of childbearing potential must be proven to not be pregnant or breast feeding
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient being treated with a radiotherapy technique other than MV photons (i.e. electrons, brachytherapy, kilovoltage (kV) photons)
* Patient of childbearing potential who is pregnant, actively trying to become pregnant or breast feeding
* Allergy to silicone or other components of either the 3D printed rigid or flexible bolus.
* Size of the bolus required for treatment exceeds 25cm in maximum diameter
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Nova Scotia Cancer Centre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lara Best, MD, FRCPC, MMEd
Radiation Oncologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lara R Best, MD, FRCPC
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Nova Scotia Cancer Centre
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Canters RA, Lips IM, Wendling M, Kusters M, van Zeeland M, Gerritsen RM, Poortmans P, Verhoef CG. Clinical implementation of 3D printing in the construction of patient specific bolus for electron beam radiotherapy for non-melanoma skin cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2016 Oct;121(1):148-153. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.07.011. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
Dipasquale G, Poirier A, Sprunger Y, Uiterwijk JWE, Miralbell R. Improving 3D-printing of megavoltage X-rays radiotherapy bolus with surface-scanner. Radiat Oncol. 2018 Oct 19;13(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-1148-1.
Kong Y, Yan T, Sun Y, Qian J, Zhou G, Cai S, Tian Y. A dosimetric study on the use of 3D-printed customized boluses in photon therapy: A hydrogel and silica gel study. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Jan;20(1):348-355. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12489. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
Robar JL, Moran K, Allan J, Clancey J, Joseph T, Chytyk-Praznik K, MacDonald RL, Lincoln J, Sadeghi P, Rutledge R. Intrapatient study comparing 3D printed bolus versus standard vinyl gel sheet bolus for postmastectomy chest wall radiation therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018 Jul-Aug;8(4):221-229. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2017.12.008. Epub 2017 Dec 24.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Squamous Cell Skin Cancer. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Version 1.2020.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
15441
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.