Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-10-07
2020-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Currently, two imaging techniques are recommended during an episode of renal colic:
1. Abdominal x-ray/Ultrasound or non-injected scanner for simple forms to be performed within 24-48h
2. The non-injected scanner for complicated forms In simple forms, the decision to perform any examination remains at the discretion of the physician but with a tendency to carry out a scanner systematically even in the absence of criteria of severity or complication.
The use of the scanner exposes the patient to large doses of radiation even if it is a low dose scanner.
In recent years, studies have been conducted to determine whether the ultrasound, particularly "point of care" ultrasound performed by an emergency physician could be an alternative in the management of renal colic. Studies show that the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound is comparable to that of the scanner. It has been found that the performance of an ultrasound by the emergency physician allows the decrease in irradiation and also in costs. In 2014,a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine emphasized that the ultrasound performed by the emergency physician would perform just as well as that performed by the radiologist and would result in a decreased time in the emergency room.
The Korean study, published in 2016 in the Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine (CEEM), despite some statistical inconsistencies, shows a significant reduction in the time of care by 74 minutes. In this context, we would like to conduct a single-centre, randomised, controlled, open-label study comparing a group of patients benefiting from point of care ultrasound versus a group of patients not benefiting from it. The goal is to determine whether the early ultrasound performed by the emergency physician by detecting expansions of the pelvicalyceal cavities reduces the time spent in the emergency department.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of the Emergency Imaging Strategy for the Diagnostic Management of Renal Colic
NCT05618262
Point-of-care Ultrasound for Clean-Catch Urine Collection in Young Children
NCT02751671
Renal Colic Fast Track Pathway in the Emergency Department.
NCT03706404
Role of Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Acute Abdomen in Pediatric Group
NCT03259048
Hydronephrosis on Ultrasound With CT Finding in Patients With Renal Colic
NCT01349244
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ultrasound
Ultrasound
The emergency physician will perform a "point of care" ultrasound. If signs of expansions of the pelvicalyceal cavities are found, an early CT scan will follow
Standard care
Standard care
Standard clinical care of patients. In regards of the clinical evolution and of biological results, a CT scan could be performed by the physician.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ultrasound
The emergency physician will perform a "point of care" ultrasound. If signs of expansions of the pelvicalyceal cavities are found, an early CT scan will follow
Standard care
Standard clinical care of patients. In regards of the clinical evolution and of biological results, a CT scan could be performed by the physician.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* fever ≥ 38.5°C
* chronic endstage kidney failure (Glomerular filtration rate \< 30%)
* Solitary kidney
* Urinary tract catheter or percutaneous nephrectomy
* Pregnancy
* traumatic back pain
* Renal colic diagnosis in the past three months
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Lille Catholic University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Duga Hervé, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
GHICL
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
GHICL
Lille, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RC-P0072
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.