Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
41 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-01-08
2021-11-04
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Treatment burden is the workload of healthcare for patients and the consequences of this workload on patient function. Treatment burden has been associated with negative outcomes in stroke, heart failure, diabetes, and renal failure. Cancer is increasingly becoming a chronic condition, and involves a variety of self-management tasks for patients and their caregivers. In this study investigators will investigate treatment burden in people after prostate and colorectal cancer. Investigators will seek to understand patient and caregiver perceptions about cancer aftercare, and ways that services could be redesigned and improved to reduce treatment burden, and improve patient outcomes.
We will undertake a qualitative interview study, recruiting patients from general practices and oncology outpatient clinics who have completed potentially curative treatment for prostate or colorectal cancer, or who are on active surveillance or hormonal therapies for localised or locally advanced prostate cancer. We will purposively sample, to ensure that participants with comorbidities, those from lower socioeconomic groups, and rural dwellers are adequately represented. We will conduct interviews according to a schedule, informed by conceptual models of burden of treatment, Schwarzer's Health Action Process Approach, and Normalisation Process Theory.
Interviews will be filmed and/or audio-recorded and transcribed. Framework and thematic analysis will be used to analyse and synthesise the data. Participants will be given the chance to comment on outputs and findings (triangulation).
Investigators plan to use the results of this study, and excerpts from video interviews during co-design events, and to create new interventions to optimise aftercare for patients with prostate and colorectal cancer.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Needs of Patients and Care-givers During and After Radiotherapy of Patients With Prostate Cancer
NCT07156903
Patient Empowerment and Risk-assessed Treatment to Improve Outcome in the Elderly After Onco-surgery
NCT01278537
Perceptions of Hospital Care at Home for Patients With Cancer: A Qualitative Study of Cancer Providers, Patients and Caregivers.
NCT05694650
Helping African American Prostate Cancer Survivors and Their Partners Cope With Challenges After Surgery for Prostate Cancer
NCT00869739
The Effect of Information Support Program on Self-efficacy of Prostate Cancer Patients During Hormonal Therapy
NCT04340713
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Treatment burden is the workload of healthcare for patients, and the effect that this work has on patient functioning and well-being. In the 1960s, Thomas Creer recognised that patient participation in their own healthcare was important in achieving disease control in paediatric asthma. Since then, "self-management" has been extensively researched and conceptualised. In the 1980s, Corbin and Strauss characterised three strands of "work" for people with chronic conditions: medical management, for example adhering to medication regimens and attending appointments; behavioural management, such as adopting healthier lifestyle practices; and the emotional management of adapting to a long-term condition.
Increasing patient participation in self-management has mostly been viewed as a positive strategy through which to improve health outcomes, reduce medical paternalism, and delegate some tasks away from over-burdened health and social care systems. Treatment burden is a relatively recent concept which highlights the potentially deleterious effects of increasing patient workload. Treatment burden is becoming increasingly relevant as more people survive into old age, often with combinations of comorbidities (including cancer) for which there are multiple available therapeutic agents and complex self-management regimens.
In diabetes, renal failure, heart failure, and stroke, there is increasing evidence that increased treatment burden is associated with reduced quality of life, non-adherence to therapeutic regimes, and wasted resources. Treatment burden is modified by patient capacity: those with lower self-efficacy, low levels of social support, financial difficulties, and competing personal workload can experience increased treatment burden. In cancer, certain large and distinct demographic groups, particularly rural dwellers and the socially deprived, have poorer survival after a cancer diagnosis. The mechanisms of these inequities have not been adequately explained.
It is feasible that treatment burden could modify interactions with health services, engagement with survivorship activities, and ultimately, cancer outcomes.
Treatment burden is a relatively recent concept which is under-explored in in cancer survivors.
The objectives of this study are:
1. To investigate patient perceptions of treatment burden after prostate and colorectal cancer.
2. To determine sources of treatment burden in prostate and colorectal cancer survivors, their interactions, and the perceived consequences of treatment burden.
3. To utilise key concepts from the interviews to build a video narrative, featuring video excerpts from participants to ensure that their voices reach a wider audience, including professionals. We will use these narratives to improve cancer services through co-design.
Qualitative interview will be conducted with approximately 40 patients, with or without linked caregivers. They will be transcribed verbatim, and analysed using Framework and thematic analysis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Interview with researcher
All participants will participate in an interview with a researcher
Interview
The interview will last approximately 45 minutes, will be audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Interview
The interview will last approximately 45 minutes, will be audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Individuals who have or have had localised or locally advanced disease, treated by any method, including and not limited to active surveillance, surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy.
* Adult age 18 years or over
* Caregivers for an individual who meets the above criteria, who are aged 18 years or over.
Exclusion Criteria
* Individuals who do not understand and/or speak English
* Individuals with significant cognitive impairment, learning difficulty, or communication difficulty such that understanding the nature of the study, the interview questions, or participating in an interview would not be practical
* Presence of distant metastases at the time of recruitment, which are being treated with palliative intent (treatment and follow up for these individuals has different aims and format)
* Individuals who are currently undergoing or on waiting lists for chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgery (for their colorectal or prostate cancer)
* Caregivers who do not have a linked patient participant
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
NHS Grampian
OTHER_GOV
University of Aberdeen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rosalind Adam
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Aberdeen
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Aberdeen
Aberdeen, UK, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Adam R, Duncan L, Maclennan SJ, Locock L. Treatment burden in survivors of prostate and colorectal cancers: a qualitative interview study. BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 3;13(3):e068997. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068997.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2-078-19
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.