High Radiofrequency Power for Faster and Safer Pulmonary Veins Isolation - a Pilot Observational Study.

NCT ID: NCT04162249

Last Updated: 2021-09-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

78 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-09-15

Study Completion Date

2020-04-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The POWER FAST I pilot study is a unicentric, observational, non-randomized controlled clinical study. In the control group pulmonary veins isolation was performded in consecutive patients with irrigated radiofrequency cateters without contact force-sensing capabilities and using conventional low-power and long-duration radiofrequency parameters (20-30 W, 30-60 s) under continuous intracardiac-echo image and esophageal temperature monitoring. The study group consist of consecutive patients distributed in three succesive subgroups. In the study group radiofrequency ablation was performed using a point-by-point technique with contact-force catheters with different high-power and short-duration parameters:

* Subgroup 50W: power 50 W, application duration ≤ 30 s, target lesion index: LSI ≥ 5 or Ablation Index ≥ 350 (posterior wall) or ≥400 (anterior wall).
* Subgroup 60W: power 60 W, application duration 7-10 s, contact force ≥5 g.
* Subgroup 70W: power 70 W, application duration 9 s, contact force ≥5 g.

The safety endpoint was evaluated with systematic esophageal endoscopy performed \<72 h after the index procedure. The efficacy endpoint was evaluated:

* during the ablation procedure: acute procedural efficacy, firts-pass isolation of ipsilateral pulmonary veins, total radiofrequency and procedural time, acute reconnections and dormant conduction,
* during the follow-up: any atrial tachycardias documented and longer than 30 s were considered recurrences.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiac Arrhythmia Atrial Fibrillation Atrial Tachycardia Esophagus Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conventional ablation (CONTROL GROUP)

Pulmonary veins ablation.

* Anterior aspect: power 30 W, catheter dragging (30 s per point).
* Posterior aspect: point-by-point ablation using 30 W/30 s applications. If esophageal temperature measured with two independent esophageal probes exceeded 49 ºC radiofrequency settings were modified to 20 W/ 60 s and the number of radiofrequency applications minimized in areas with esophageal temperature rise.

Al procedures were performed with continuos intracardiac echo image and esophageal temperature monitoring.

Conventional LSI/AI-guided pulmonary veins ablation.

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional (low-power and long-duration) radiofrequency application.

Esophageal temperature monitoring

Intervention Type OTHER

Two probes were simultaneously used: a deflectable one and a non-deflectable one.

Esophageal endoscopy

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Esophageal endoscopy for acute detection of esophageal thermal lesions \<72 hours after ablation.

High-power and short-duration ablation

Pulmonary veins ablation.

* Subgroup 50W: power 50 W, application duration ≤ 30 s, target lesion index: LSI ≥ 5 or Ablation Index ≥ 350 (posterior wall) or ≥400 (anterior wall).
* Subgroup 60W: power 60 W, application duration 7-10 s, contact force ≥5 g.
* Subgroup 70W: power 70 W, application duration 9 s, contact force ≥5 g.

Intracardiac echo was not used. Esophageal temperature probes were used only in 6 patients in the subgroup 50W.

High-power pulmonary veins ablation.

Intervention Type OTHER

Experimental (high-power and short-duration) radiofrequency application.

Esophageal endoscopy

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Esophageal endoscopy for acute detection of esophageal thermal lesions \<72 hours after ablation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Conventional LSI/AI-guided pulmonary veins ablation.

Conventional (low-power and long-duration) radiofrequency application.

Intervention Type OTHER

High-power pulmonary veins ablation.

Experimental (high-power and short-duration) radiofrequency application.

Intervention Type OTHER

Esophageal temperature monitoring

Two probes were simultaneously used: a deflectable one and a non-deflectable one.

Intervention Type OTHER

Esophageal endoscopy

Esophageal endoscopy for acute detection of esophageal thermal lesions \<72 hours after ablation.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Consecutive and unselected patients with a class I-IIa indication for ablation of paroxysmal or persistent AF.
* Informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous surgical or catheter-based PVI.
* Stroke or acute coronary syndrome \<6 months before ablation.
* Terminal comorbidities.
* Frailty, or clinical instability.
* Absolute contraindication for oral anticoagulation.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital Universitario La Paz

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Sergio Castrejón-Castrejón

Electrophysiologist, co-PI (togheter with Dr. José Luis Merino, main principal investigator)

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital La Paz, Department of Cardiology

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Castrejon-Castrejon S, Martinez Cossiani M, Ortega Molina M, Escobar C, Froilan Torres C, Gonzalo Bada N, Diaz de la Torre M, Suarez Parga JM, Lopez Sendon JL, Merino JL. Feasibility and safety of pulmonary vein isolation by high-power short-duration radiofrequency application: short-term results of the POWER-FAST PILOT study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2020 Jan;57(1):57-65. doi: 10.1007/s10840-019-00645-5. Epub 2019 Nov 12.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31713704 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PI-3271

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.