Creation and Validation of a Questionnaire Evaluating Diastasis Recti
NCT ID: NCT04158180
Last Updated: 2023-05-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
125 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-09-27
2023-12-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
At present, the quantitative evaluation of DRA is performed purely anatomically. This evaluation consists in measuring the separation between the two rectus abdominis. Currently there is no consensus as to the protocol that should be used for this measurement.
So far, no instrument is able to quantitatively measure the consequences of DRA. The evaluation of symptoms and consequences should include relevant parameters such as quality of life, perception of body image and functional limitations.
The objective of this study is the creation and validation of a specific questionnaire to evaluate the symptoms and consequences of DRA.
Material and methods. A) Development of the questionnaire
1. Literature review
2. Online survey
3. Expert panel
4. Pilot test of the questionnaire
B) Validation of the questionnaire. The psychometric properties of the questionnaire will be evaluated in a sample of patients with DRA. The sample will be composed of a group of adult women with DRA who attended to a physiotherapy clinic.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Diastasis Recti Abdominis and Abdominal Muscles
NCT02397941
Diastasis Recti Abdominis and a Combined Treatment With Abdominal Exercise and Radiofrequency
NCT06214650
The Effect of Conservative Interventions on the Signs and Symptoms of Diastasis Recti
NCT02268110
Low Back Pain and Motor Control Dysfunction After Pregnancy- the Possible Role of Abdominal Rectus Muscle Diastasis
NCT05485844
Changes in Abdominal Muscles Performance in Postpartum Women.
NCT03425916
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The main aim of this projet is the development and validation of such a tool.
Material and methods.
The current project consists of several stages:
A) Development of the questionnaire.
1. Literature review. A systematic review will be created to identify the relevant self-reported variables in the study of DRA in adult women. Observational studies evaluating the link between DRA and self-reported symptoms will be searched through Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. The methodological quality will be assessed independently by two evaluators using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. This review was registered in Prospero (Review Registration Number: PROSPERO CRD42017058089). This systematic review will be conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement.
2. Online survey. A mixed observational study will be performed through a semi-structured online survey in order to identify relevant variables in women with DRA. The Ethics Committee of the University of Valencia (June 5, 2019, 13.49.17) approved the implementation of this study. Women will sign an informed consent. The study will be carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The analysis of the perception of the symptoms of DRA and its repercussion at a physical, psychological and social level in women affected by this condition will be assessed. The data will be analyzed quantitatively and qualitative. Key concepts will be categorized according to their dimension through the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).The CHERRIES publication guideline will be used to report the survey data.
3. Expert panel. Taking in account the results of both, the systematic review and the online survey, a first generation of items will be performed by the main authors. These items will be presented in a panel composed by various experts in this field (with prominent academic background or an extended work experience related with DRA management and/or research methods) and a patient. Experts will rate the comprehensiveness, relevance, and coherence of each item in a 4-points numerical scale. They will categorized each item in the dimension to which they believed it appertained. Aiken´s V index will be calculated. A preliminary version of the Questionnaire will be then created.
4. Pilot test of the questionnaire. The preliminary version of the Questionnaire will be tested in a pilot sample composed of 30 females with DRA. The Ethics Committee of the University of Valencia (June 5, 2019, 13.49.17) and the Committee at Canterbury Christ Church University (10/08/2021 ETH2021-0362) approved the implementation of this study. Women will sign an informed consent. The study will be carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Women will complete a set of questions including demographic data, the preliminary questionnaire and an evaluation of the preliminary questionnaire. An evaluation of the comprehensibility, comprehensiveness and relevance of each item will be performed using a 4-point Likert scale. Participants will be able to include their comments and remarks, individually for each item, as well as for the whole questionnaire and the questionnaire structure. Final version of the questionnaire will be then created. After the completion of the study, the dataset will be published. The COSMIN Study Design checklist for Patient-reported outcome measurement instruments will be used to report and design this study.
B) Validation of the questionnaire. The psychometric properties of the questionnaire will be evaluated in a sample of patients with DRA. The sample will be composed of a group of adult women with DRA who attended to a physiotherapy clinic. Participants will complete a series of questions including sociodemographic variables and the final version of the questionnaire. In order to calculate convergent validity, participants will be asked to complete five comparative questionnaires: Whoqol-bref overall quality of life and general health" subscale, GIQLI "Symptoms" subscale, Whoqol-bref "social relationships" subscale, WHODAS-36 "mobility" and "life activities" subscales and Body Image States Scale (BISS).Internal consistency, the type error, the ceiling floor effect, the convergent validity, the validity of the construct, the discriminatory capacity and the minimum detectable change of the questionnaire will be calculated. Seven to 10 days after the completion of the online survey, participants will be asked to fill in the final questionnaire again in order to evaluate test-retest reliability. The standard error of the measurement, the minimum detectable change and the intraclass correlation coefficient will be calculated. After the completion of the study, the dataset will be published. The COSMIN Study Design checklist for Patient-reported outcome measurement instruments will be used to report and design this study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Questionnaire
A battery of questionnaires will be propose to the participants
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* adult,
* women.
Exclusion Criteria
* lack of knowledge of Spanish language.
* ventral hernia.
* previous abdominal surgeries.
18 Years
65 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Caen
OTHER
University of Valencia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Montserrat Rejano Campo, PhD(c)
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Haro&Campos Physiotherapy.
Plasencia, Cáceres, Spain
Department of Physiotherapy. University of Valencia
Valencia, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
QUEDIA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.