Epidemiology of Suspected Epileptic Seizures

NCT ID: NCT04147663

Last Updated: 2019-12-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

2300 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-10-31

Study Completion Date

2020-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The occurrence of isolated or recurring epileptic seizures accounts for an important use of the healthcare system. Typically, epileptic patient will consult ten times a year a physician (specialist or familial doctor) and will justify 24 diagnostic procedures or additional examinations. Moreover, epileptic seizures are associated with frequent use of emergency departments. From the first emergency call received by the Emergency medical assistance service (SAMU), the actual management of the patient having epileptic seizure includes the eventual transfer to the paramedical team then within an emergency unit. However in some cases, emergency allocation may be avoided as 70% of patients recover their baseline condition upon admission. The main objective of this study is to describe the management of the adult population suffering from suspected seizure by the emergency structures. For 3 consecutive days, all patients with suspected epileptic seizures (diagnosed by the SAMU, paramedics and emergency unit) will be enrolled in the study. Data of medical care management and information from patients or witnesses will be collected on a questionnaire by the physicians of the SAMU, paramedics and emergency unit. Then, the anonymized questionnaires will be sent to RESUVAL (Emergency Network of the Rhone Valley) to ensure data entry and statistical analysis. By identifying the factors leading the SAMU to transfer a patient with suspected epileptic seizure to an emergency unit, this study will provide a more appropriate procedure to prevent unnecessary emergency admissions. It will also gain more insights into the patient outcomes, such as complementary medication, brain examination or referral to a neurologist.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Epilepsy is a neurological disorder in which brain activity becomes abnormal, causing unpredictable seizures. It affects people of all ages and in 2018, it is estimated that 1% of the world's population is suffering from epilepsy. In France, the recommendations for care of people with a first or recurring seizures are now well codified (Société française de neurologie, 2014; Société française de Médecine d'Urgence, 2018). It is also recognized that the quality of the neurological follow-up and the subsequent control of epilepsy reduces the cost of medical care and the number of emergency entries (Manjunath, 2012). However, occurrence of epileptic seizures still accounts for an important use of the healthcare system and especially those of emergency unit. Typically, it has been reported that epileptic patient will consult ten times a year a physician (specialist or familial doctor) and will justify 24 diagnostic procedures or additional examinations (Kurth, 2010). In France, nearly 3% of calls to the Emergency medical assistance service (SAMU) and 1.6% of emergency entries are linked to an epileptic seizure. Moreover, the care and the management of epilepsy by the SAMU and emergency structures generate a significant financial cost. The French CAROLE cohort study described that in the first and second year after diagnosis of epilepsy, hospitalization cost respectively accounts for 68% and 40% of the total cost of care (de Zelicourt, 2000). In addition, it has been estimated that the extra cost of emergency admissions for patients with epilepsy represents $ 9.6 billion per year (Cramer, 2014). The decision of a physician to orient a patient toward an emergency unit is based on clinical or anamnesis criteria. An European study has highlighted factors associated with an increased risk of emergency admission (Balestrini, 2013); Patient with current psychiatric therapy, drug polytherapy, comorbidities, or that are experiencing more than one episode in the same day and changes in usual seizure pattern are more exposed to be referred to an emergency center (Balestrini, 2013). These findings were reinforced by another study showing the importance of ambulatory supervision measures in the prevention of emergency admissions not justified medically (Tatum, 2008). However, sociodemographic disparities in health care use among epileptic patients have been identified in the US, which could be explained by the executive differences of the sites of care (Begley, 2009). Such data on the practices in the emergency services nor the adequacy between practices and health recommendations are currently unavailable in France. However, we can assume that such heterogeneity of health care exists in France and leads to different health care management. Moreover, the significant emergency congestion that are collectively facing hospitals is associated with heterogeneity in patient health care (Wong, 2010). Although neuro-examination allows an adapted antiepileptic treatment when it is justified (Paliwal, 2015) and is required following episode of inaugural seizure, the possibility for a patient admitted in the emergency department to benefit from an electroencephalogram (EEG) has not been precisely studied in France. However, a study identified patterns (such as head trauma, neurovascular damage, infectious context, withdrawal context in antiepileptic drugs …) that lead to brain investigation by complementary neuroimaging (Annegers, 1995). Also, it has been reported that older patient have higher probability to benefit from neuroimaging (Martindale, 2011).

Finally, it is important to note that in some cases, emergency admissions may be avoided as 60% of patients have an already known historical diagnosis of epilepsy (Girot, 2015), 70% of patients recovered their baseline condition upon admission (Dickson, 2017) or other were discharged home without medical care (Dickson, 2017). In Australia, the prevalence of emergency presentations for recurring seizures has decreased and it is suggested to be linked with improved levels of education and health care delivery (Cordato, 2009).

Thus, we hypothesized that an optimized emergency medical pathway among epileptic patient would optimized the patient outcome (epilepsy treatments, quality of life) and would also benefit for the logistic of the emergency department.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Epilepsy

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

emergency epileptic seizure epilepsy neurology

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

describe the management of the adult population suffering from suspected seizure by the emergency structures

For 3 consecutive days, all patients with suspected epileptic seizures (assessed by the Emergency medical assistance service ( SAMU), paramedical team and the emergency unit) will be included in the study. With the use of questionnaries, information will be collected from patients or witnesses by the SAMU, the paramedical team or physicians of the emergency unit. A 7-day follow-up will be carried out by the principal investigator (PI) of each center.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Any patient ≥18 years calling the SAMU and / or supported by a paramedical team and / or admitted to an emergency unit for suspected symptoms of epileptic seizure will be included.

* SAMU=Emergency medical assistance service

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with no epileptic seizures (assessed by the SAMU, paramedical team and the emergency unit) can't be enrolled in the study.

* SAMU=Emergency medical assistance service
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

RESCUe - RESeau Cardiologie Urgence / RESUVal - RESeau des Urgences de la vallée du Rhône

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre Hospitalier Saint Joseph Saint Luc de Lyon

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sylvie MEYRAN, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre Hospitalier Saint Joseph St Luc de Lyon

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre Hospitalier St Joseph St Luc

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Sophie ARMAND

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 0033478618091

Email: [email protected]

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EPILEPSIE2019

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id