Evaluation Study of HCV RDTs in Fresh Samples

NCT ID: NCT04139941

Last Updated: 2020-07-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1540 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-07-31

Study Completion Date

2020-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study evaluates the sensitivity and specificity performance of three Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) in freshly collected fingerstick whole blood, as well as serum and plasma (Premier Medical Corporation First Response HCV RDT; Beijing Wantai HCV RDT; AccessBio Care Start HCV under development). Performance is compared to the SD Bioline HCV RDT, as well as a composite reference standard, consisting of two enzyme Immunoassay and a line immunoassay.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major public health burden, with an estimated 71 million patients being infected globally. If undiagnosed, HCV infection can lead to severe liver damage, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The World Health Organization (WHO) recently set a target to eliminate HCV by 2030. The first critical step in reaching this target is to accurately identify people infected with HCV. Globally, significant gaps remain in diagnosis of HCV, with four out of five people infected still unaware of their status, largely due to lack of access to testing services.

In resource-limited settings (RLS), laboratory-based testing remains a mainstay for HCV screening and confirmatory testing. Such laboratory-based assays rely on transportation of temperature-sensitive samples from clinic sites to centralized laboratories, high-tech equipment and highly skilled laboratory technicians, limiting the scope of access to testing and resulting in long turn-around times for results. In recent years, new technologies have been developed to decentralize HCV screening and confirmatory testing using point-of-care (POC) assays to overcome these barriers and improve patient outcomes.

Rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) for screening for HCV are affordable, accurate, easy to use by healthcare workers, and robust in field settings. Although a number of HCV RDTs are on the market, currently only two have received WHO pre-qualification (PQ) status, demonstrating their accuracy and reliability for use in the field in RLS. Data on a number of other RDTs indicate their suitability for use. More data is needed, however, in field settings for these HCV RDTs, to demonstrate their accuracy and quality in end-user studies and to provide evidence for WHO PQ approval.

Based on the results of a recent FIND laboratory evaluation assessing the performance of 13 HCV RDTs using archived plasma samples, we have selected three candidate HCV RDTs ("study RDTs") for further evaluation in field settings (e.g. primary healthcare facilities). The performance of these RDTs measured in frozen plasma specimens indicated that they have a high potential to meet WHO PQ performance criteria in freshly collected samples. In addition, the manufacturers each demonstrate evidence of engagement to pursue both CE-mark status and the WHO PQ process, showing commitment to delivering quality-assured tests to the market.

The data generated during this study will be used to inform national and international stakeholders on HCV RDT performance in field settings and shared with manufacturers to support the evidence package for WHO PQ and/or CE-marking.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Individuals with known or unknown HCV status

Test for HCV antibodies with an RDT

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Fingerstick whole blood, plasma and serum of each participant is tested with three investigational HCV RDTs and one reference HCV RDT. Plasma is also used for testing with the composite reference standard, HCV viral load and genotyping. All participants are also tested for HIV with an HIV RDT.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Test for HCV antibodies with an RDT

Fingerstick whole blood, plasma and serum of each participant is tested with three investigational HCV RDTs and one reference HCV RDT. Plasma is also used for testing with the composite reference standard, HCV viral load and genotyping. All participants are also tested for HIV with an HIV RDT.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ≥ 18 years of age
* Known or unknown HCV serology
* No history of past or present HCV treatment
* Willing to undergo the information and consenting procedure and subsequently have enough time to participate in the study
* Willing to provide 13 ml venepuncture blood sample and a minimum of four whole blood fingerstick samples
* Willing to perform an HIV test
* Individuals can already be registered at the local site or register for the first time when enrolling in the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Participants not able to consent themselves (incapable)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Switzerland

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sihanouk Hospital Centre of Hope

Phnom Penh, , Cambodia

Site Status

National Center for Disease Control & Public Health/Lugar Center

Tbilisi, , Georgia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Cambodia Georgia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

8162-2/2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The DETECT HCV Screening Trial
NCT04003454 COMPLETED NA
Truenat™ HCV RNA Assay Evaluation
NCT04236973 COMPLETED NA