Very Rapid and Rapid Virological Response as Predictors of Response of HCV Tretment
NCT ID: NCT03480269
Last Updated: 2018-07-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-08-01
2020-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safety of Sofosbuvir ,Daclatasvir in HCV Patients and RAVS in Resistent and Relapsed Cases
NCT03572140
Study to Assess Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Simeprevir, Daclatasvir and Sofosbuvir in Treatment-naive Participants With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 Infection
NCT02349048
Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Daclatasvir/Sofosbuvir/Ribavirin for 16 Versus 24 Weeks for HCV Genotype 3 Cirrhotics
NCT02304159
Response Guided Treatment With Direct Acting Anti-Viral Medications for Chronic HCV Infection
NCT03603327
Safety and Efficacy Study of the Combination Daclatasvir (60 mg), Sofosbuvir (400 mg) and Ribavirin (Weight-based Dosing) for 12 or 16 Weeks in Subjects With Genotype 3 Chronic HCV Infection With or Without Prior Treatment Experience and Advanced Fibrosis or Compensated Cirrhosis
NCT02319031
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
. There is a growing body of evidence that suggests that treatment will help reduce liver inflammation, may reverse liver damage (scarring),slow down disease progression and improve symptoms and quality of life. All of these factors are important reasons to seek HCV medical treatment Identifying host-viral factors that predict the likelihood of SVR prior to initiating therapy would be a very useful clinical tool that could help reduce costs and avoid unnecessary exposure to therapy with significant side effects Little is known about predictors of failure to achieve SVR with DAAs. Although numerous clinical parameters predicted poor response to pegylated IFN treatment , none of them have been shown to be associated with virological relapse after DAA based therapy
Treatment response terms:
The ultra rapid virological response (uRVR) is a new endpoint that we defined as an undetectable serum HCV RNA at the end of 1st week of therapy.
The very rapid virologic response( vRVR )defined as undetectable serum HCV RNA level at week 2.
The rapid virological response (RVR) defined as undetectable serum HCV RNA after 4 weeks of treatment sustained virological response (SVR), which is defined by the undetectable serum HCV RNA 12-24 weeks after the end of treatment Relapser was defined as undetectable viral load at the end of DAA treatment but subsequent detectable viral load at 12 weeks after treatment end.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Detectable HCV RNA by quantitative PCR prior to treatment.
* Naïve patients (not received any HCV treatment regimen before)
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with combined HBV and HCV
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sara Mohammed Mahrous Sayed
Doctor
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Patel K, Lucas JE, Thompson JW, Dubois LG, Tillmann HL, Thompson AJ, Uzarski D, Califf RM, Moseley MA, Ginsburg GS, McHutchison JG, McCarthy JJ; MURDOCK Horizon 1 Study Team. High predictive accuracy of an unbiased proteomic profile for sustained virologic response in chronic hepatitis C patients. Hepatology. 2011 Jun;53(6):1809-18. doi: 10.1002/hep.24284. Epub 2011 May 14.
Cavalcante LN, Lyra AC. Predictive factors associated with hepatitis C antiviral therapy response. World J Hepatol. 2015 Jun 28;7(12):1617-31. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i12.1617.
Childs K, Merritt E, Considine A, Sanchez-Fueyo A, Agarwal K, Martinez-Llordella M, Carey I. Immunological Predictors of Nonresponse to Directly Acting Antiviral Therapy in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C and Decompensated Cirrhosis. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017 Apr 3;4(2):ofx067. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofx067. eCollection 2017 Spring.
Yakoot M, Abdo AM, Yousry A, Helmy S. Very rapid virologic response and early HCV response kinetics, as quick measures to compare efficacy and guide a personalized response-guided therapy. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016 Aug 25;10:2659-67. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S111496. eCollection 2016.
Yek C, de la Flor C, Marshall J, Zoellner C, Thompson G, Quirk L, Mayorga C, Turner BJ, Singal AG, Jain MK. Effectiveness of direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C in difficult-to-treat patients in a safety-net health system: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Med. 2017 Nov 20;15(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0969-3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HCV tretment
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.