Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of Arabic Version of COMI in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain
NCT ID: NCT04136964
Last Updated: 2021-07-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
120 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-11-01
2022-03-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To translate, validate and examine the psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the COMI in Egyptian patients with neck pain.
BACKGROUND:
Neck pain is a highly prevalent musculoskeletal disorders in adults affecting from 45.5% to 48%. It may cause disability that interferes with the quality of life. It is usually treated conservatively. To evaluate treatment effectiveness, patients need close monitoring and follow-up.
Different assessment tools are recommended including patient reported outcome measures. One of the newly introduced outcome measure is The Neck Core Outcome Measure Index (COMI). It is characterized by being brief, simple, self-reported and easy to answer questionnaire. The SPINE TANGO, which is the spine organization In Europe, has recommended its use for all patients with spine disorders.
This questionnaire has been translated into different languages such as German, Polish and Italian but it has never been translated and validated in the Arabic language.
HYPOTHESES
1. The Arabic version of neck-COMI will be a valid tool for the assessment of neck pain in Egyptian patients.
2. The Arabic version of neck-COMI will be a reliable tool for the assessment of neck pain in Egyptian patients.
RESEARCH QUESTION:
Will the Arabic version of neck-COMI be a valid and reliable tool to assess neck pain in the Egyptian patients?
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cross Culture Adaptation Validity and Reliability of Arabic Version of Cornell Muscloskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire
NCT06523842
Effect of Upper Thoracic Manipulation on Neck Pain and Selected Muscle Activities
NCT06926738
Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Disorders
NCT06709677
Effectiveness of Dermoneuromodulation Techniques in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT05893745
Effect of Integrated Neuromuscular Inhibition Technique on Subjects with Neck Pain and Forward Head Posture
NCT05439018
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Translation:
The cross-cultural adaptation process for the COMI will be done as described by Beaton and colleagues (2000). This will include the following phases:
1. Initial translation that includes forward translation to translate the questionnaire from the English language to Arabic by two independent bilingual translators one of them is familiar with the concepts of the COMI and the other translator doesn't have medical background.
2. Synthesis of the translations by comparing the two Arabic translations and combine them into one version.
3. Back translation to translate the Arabic version to the English language again. This should be done by two independent translators both of them shouldn't have medical background, yet not familiar with the use of COMI then comparing between two backwards translations to determine any differences between them and the original one.
4. Expert committee that consists of both translators, one of the back-translators, one bilingual clinician and one native English clinical research scientist to compare between versions of the COMI and consolidate the final version. The role of the expert committee to detect and correct any conceptual errors or inconsistencies, grammatical or other errors.
5. Test of the pre-final version of the instrument in a small sample to assess its content and face validity according to patients' feedback and collect comments about wording and clarity of the translated version via semi-structured interview. This will be done in a sample of 20 patients who fulfill the study inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients will be asked to complete the final Arabic version of COMI and will be asked to comment on any linguistic ambiguity. Finally, researcher will discuss received comments and a consensus will be done to adapt any necessary changes.
(2) Validation and reliability testing:
One hundred male and female adults will be recruited from physiotherapy and Orthopedic outpatient clinics.This sample size has been recommended as an appropriate size for reliability and validity analyses.
Validation testing:
COMI will be tested by comparing it with Visual Analogue scale (VAS), EuroQol-visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), EuroQo-5D (EQ-5D), Neck disability index (NDI).
Reliability testing:
Each patient will be asked to complete the questionnaire booklet in two-separate sessions within 14 days.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients group
Patients who have pain located in the anatomical region of the neck for more than three months due to mechanical causes; with or without radiation to the head, trunk, and upper limbs. Posteriorly, pain may be present in the neck region from the superior nuchal line to the spine of the scapula and the side region down to the superior border of the clavicle and the suprasternal notch.
Neck COMI
Patients will be asked to fill a questionnaire booklet consisting of five patient-reported outcome measures twice within 14 days.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Neck COMI
Patients will be asked to fill a questionnaire booklet consisting of five patient-reported outcome measures twice within 14 days.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age ranges from 20 and 60 years.
3. Referred with the diagnosis of chronic mechanical neck pain with and without arm pain.
4. Pain duration is greater than 3 months.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Specific etiology of neck pain like spinal stenosis or fracture.
3. Previous surgery or trauma to the spine
4. Upper quadrant dysfunction, rather than radiculopathy.
5. Inability to read (illiterate)
20 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Aliaa Rehan Youssef
Assistant professor of Orthopedic Physical Therapy
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Aliaa Regan Youssef, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cairo University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cairo university Outpatient clinics
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Dec;81(12 Suppl 2):S15-20. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.20619.
Ariens GA, van Mechelen W, Bongers PM, Bouter LM, van der Wal G. Psychosocial risk factors for neck pain: a systematic review. Am J Ind Med. 2001 Feb;39(2):180-93. doi: 10.1002/1097-0274(200102)39:23.0.co;2-#.
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014. No abstract available.
Blanpied PR, Gross AR, Elliott JM, Devaney LL, Clewley D, Walton DM, Sparks C, Robertson EK. Neck Pain: Revision 2017. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Jul;47(7):A1-A83. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.0302.
Bongers PM, Ijmker S, van den Heuvel S, Blatter BM. Epidemiology of work related neck and upper limb problems: psychosocial and personal risk factors (part I) and effective interventions from a bio behavioural perspective (part II). J Occup Rehabil. 2006 Sep;16(3):279-302. doi: 10.1007/s10926-006-9044-1.
Boonstra AM, Schiphorst Preuper HR, Reneman MF, Posthumus JB, Stewart RE. Reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale for disability in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Int J Rehabil Res. 2008 Jun;31(2):165-9. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3282fc0f93.
Borghouts JAJ, Koes BW, Bouter LM. The clinical course and prognostic factors of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review. Pain. 1998 Jul;77(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00058-X.
Cagnie B, Danneels L, Van Tiggelen D, De Loose V, Cambier D. Individual and work related risk factors for neck pain among office workers: a cross sectional study. Eur Spine J. 2007 May;16(5):679-86. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0269-7. Epub 2006 Dec 8.
Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, Malmivaara A, Roland M, Von Korff M, Waddell G. Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Sep 15;23(18):2003-13. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199809150-00018.
Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and Reliability in Social Science Research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105-123
Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Katz NP, Kerns RD, Stucki G, Allen RR, Bellamy N, Carr DB, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dionne R, Galer BS, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Kramer LD, Manning DC, Martin S, McCormick CG, McDermott MP, McGrath P, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Robbins W, Robinson JP, Rothman M, Royal MA, Simon L, Stauffer JW, Stein W, Tollett J, Wernicke J, Witter J; IMMPACT. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2005 Jan;113(1-2):9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012. No abstract available.
Eldridge S, Ashby D, Bennett C, Wakelin M, Feder G. Internal and external validity of cluster randomised trials: systematic review of recent trials. BMJ. 2008 Apr 19;336(7649):876-80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39517.495764.25. Epub 2008 Mar 25.
Fankhauser CD, Mutter U, Aghayev E, Mannion AF. Validity and responsiveness of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the neck. Eur Spine J. 2012 Jan;21(1):101-14. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1921-4. Epub 2011 Aug 20.
Feise RJ, Michael Menke J. Functional rating index: a new valid and reliable instrument to measure the magnitude of clinical change in spinal conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Jan 1;26(1):78-86; discussion 87. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200101010-00015.
Fejer R, Kyvik KO, Hartvigsen J. The prevalence of neck pain in the world population: a systematic critical review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2006 Jun;15(6):834-48. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0864-4. Epub 2005 Jul 6.
Feng Y, Parkin D, Devlin NJ. Assessing the performance of the EQ-VAS in the NHS PROMs programme. Qual Life Res. 2014 Apr;23(3):977-89. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0537-z. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
Ferguson L. External validity, generalizability, and knowledge utilization. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2004;36(1):16-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2004.04006.x.
Guzman J, Hurwitz EL, Carroll LJ, Haldeman S, Cote P, Carragee EJ, Peloso PM, van der Velde G, Holm LW, Hogg-Johnson S, Nordin M, Cassidy JD. A new conceptual model of neck pain: linking onset, course, and care: the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 Feb;32(2 Suppl):S17-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.11.007.
Howard, H. (1996). The Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders. Musculoskeletal Pain, 4(4), 95-104
Hudswell, S., Von Mengersen, M., & Lucas, N. (2005). The cranio-cervical flexion test using pressure biofeedback : A useful measure of cervical dysfunction in the clinical setting ? International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine, 8(3), 98-105
Jull, G. A. (2000). Deep Cervical Flexor Muscle Dysfunction in Whiplash. Musculoskeletal Pain, 8(1-2), 143-154
Kaplan RM, Bush JW, Berry CC. Health status: types of validity and the index of well-being. Health Serv Res. 1976 Winter;11(4):478-507.
Kimberlin CL, Winterstein AG. Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008 Dec 1;65(23):2276-84. doi: 10.2146/ajhp070364.
Klimek L, Bergmann KC, Biedermann T, Bousquet J, Hellings P, Jung K, Merk H, Olze H, Schlenter W, Stock P, Ring J, Wagenmann M, Wehrmann W, Mosges R, Pfaar O. Visual analogue scales (VAS): Measuring instruments for the documentation of symptoms and therapy monitoring in cases of allergic rhinitis in everyday health care: Position Paper of the German Society of Allergology (AeDA) and the German Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), ENT Section, in collaboration with the working group on Clinical Immunology, Allergology and Environmental Medicine of the German Society of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNOKHC). Allergo J Int. 2017;26(1):16-24. doi: 10.1007/s40629-016-0006-7. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res. 1995 Aug;4(4):293-307. doi: 10.1007/BF01593882.
McLean SM, May S, Klaber-Moffett J, Sharp DM, Gardiner E. Risk factors for the onset of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 Jul;64(7):565-72. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.090720. Epub 2010 May 12.
Miekisiak G, Banach M, Kiwic G, Kubaszewski L, Kaczmarczyk J, Sulewski A, Kloc W, Libionka W, Latka D, Kollataj M, Zaluski R. Reliability and validity of the Polish version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for the neck. Eur Spine J. 2014 Apr;23(4):898-903. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-3129-2. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
Misailidou V, Malliou P, Beneka A, Karagiannidis A, Godolias G. Assessment of patients with neck pain: a review of definitions, selection criteria, and measurement tools. J Chiropr Med. 2010 Jun;9(2):49-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2010.03.002.
Misterska E, Jankowski R, Glowacki M. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Neck Disability Index and Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale for patients with neck pain due to degenerative and discopathic disorders. Psychometric properties of the Polish versions. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Apr 29;12:84. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-84.
Monticone M, Ferrante S, Maggioni S, Grenat G, Checchia GA, Testa M, Teli MG, Mannion AF. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the cross-culturally adapted Italian version of the core outcome measures index (COMI) for the neck. Eur Spine J. 2014 Apr;23(4):863-72. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-3092-y. Epub 2013 Nov 23.
White P, Lewith G, Prescott P. The core outcomes for neck pain: validation of a new outcome measure. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Sep 1;29(17):1923-30. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000137066.50291.da.
Rebbeck TJ, Refshauge KM, Maher CG, Stewart M. Evaluation of the core outcome measure in whiplash. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Mar 15;32(6):696-702. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000257595.75367.52.
Sach TH, Barton GR, Doherty M, Muir KR, Jenkinson C, Avery AJ. The relationship between body mass index and health-related quality of life: comparing the EQ-5D, EuroQol VAS and SF-6D. Int J Obes (Lond). 2007 Jan;31(1):189-96. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803365. Epub 2006 May 9.
Schellingerhout JM, Verhagen AP, Heymans MW, Koes BW, de Vet HC, Terwee CB. Measurement properties of disease-specific questionnaires in patients with neck pain: a systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2012 May;21(4):659-70. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9965-9. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
Shaheen AA, Omar MT, Vernon H. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Arabic version of neck disability index in patients with neck pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 May 1;38(10):E609-15. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828b2d09.
Stahl MK, El-Metwally AA, Mikkelsson MK, Salminen JJ, Pulkkinen LR, Rose RJ, Kaprio JA. Genetic and environmental influences on non-specific neck pain in early adolescence: a classical twin study. Eur J Pain. 2013 Jul;17(6):791-8. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2012.00247.x. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
Tawfik soliman, D. M. (2012). validity and reliability testing of translated arabic version of neck disability index
Tsakitzidis, G., Remmen, R., Dankaerts, W., & Van Royen, P. (2013). Non- Specific Neck Pain and Evidence-Based Practice. European Scientific Journal (ESJ), 9(3), 1-19
Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Revicki D, Harding G, Burke LB, Cella D, Cleeland CS, Cowan P, Farrar JT, Hertz S, Max MB, Rappaport BA. Identifying important outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: an IMMPACT survey of people with pain. Pain. 2008 Jul 15;137(2):276-285. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.09.002. Epub 2007 Oct 15.
Vernon H. The Neck Disability Index: state-of-the-art, 1991-2008. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Sep;31(7):491-502. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.08.006.
Wainner RS, Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ, Boninger ML, Delitto A, Allison S. Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of the clinical examination and patient self-report measures for cervical radiculopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jan 1;28(1):52-62. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200301010-00014.
Ware JE Jr. SF-36 health survey update. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3130-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00008. No abstract available.
Whynes DK; TOMBOLA Group. Correspondence between EQ-5D health state classifications and EQ VAS scores. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008 Nov 7;6:94. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-6-94.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SYahya
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.