Safety and Efficacy of DCB Therapy for ISR Under the Guidance of QFR (UNIQUE-DCB-II Study )

NCT ID: NCT04119986

Last Updated: 2025-05-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

220 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-01-01

Study Completion Date

2028-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In 1970, the first percutaneous balloon coronary angioplasty opened a new chapter of interventional therapy. However, the incidence of intracoronary restenosis was about 30%. Subsequently, bare metal stents and drug-eluting stents (DES) reduced the incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) to 5%-10% and it was still a bottleneck treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Currently, ISR is mainly treated by balloon angioplasty, stent implantation and coronary artery bypass grafting.

In 2014, the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology recommended that drug balloon therapy (DCB) and new generation DES should be the preferred strategies for ISR treatment. Compared with DES, DCB treatment can avoid the inflammation of intima caused by multi-layer stent strut, and reduce the risk of intimal hyperplasia and thrombosis in stent. However, DCB lacks sustained radial support. Even if the residual stenosis is less than 30% after sufficient pre-dilation, the elastic retraction of the intima still exists. In addition, the antiproliferative effect of paclitaxel is significantly worse than that of sirolimus and its derivatives, and there is a lack of long-term sustained release of anti-proliferative drugs. Compared with DCB, DES can obtain long-term stable radial support and long-term anti-proliferation effect, but stent struts exposed in the vascular lumen are at risk of stent thrombosis. The new generation of DES improves the design of stent platform, improves the polymer coating, and applies new anti-proliferative drugs. It effectively reduces the inflammation of vascular wall, speeds up the process of vascular re-endothelialization, promotes early vascular repair, and significantly reduces the incidence of stent thrombosis. Recent BIOLUXRCT, RESTORE and DARE studies provide more powerful evidence for the treatment of ISR by new generation DES.

Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is the second generation FFR detectional method based on coronary contrast image. The latest FAVOR II results also confirm that QFR is more sensitive and specific than quantitative coronary analysis (QCA) in the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia caused by coronary artery stenosis. However, there is no report of ISR treated with DCB under the guidance of QFR. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DCB in the treatment of in-stent restenosis in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) under the guidance of QFR compared with DES implantation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The current study is designed as a multicenter, randomized and prospective study aiming to evaluate the safety and efficacy of drug balloon therapy for ISR in patients with CHD under the guidance of QFR compared with DES implantation. Based on previous study reported, the incidence rate of target lesion failure is about 3% in patients with ISR undergoing DES implantation. And the design of non-inferiority study was performed in our study. Moreover, the investigators estimated 10% loss follow-up of these patients in each arm. As a result, a total of 220 patients with ISR were required, and with 110 patients per group as a ratio of 1:1 randomization.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Heart Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

drug coated balloon

A total of 110 patients with ISR are assigned to drug coated balloon treated group after randomization schedule.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

drug coated balloon

Intervention Type DEVICE

Balloon/vessel diameter ratio 0.8-1.0, 8-12 ATM (atmosphere), lasting for \>30 seconds.

drug eluted stent implantation

A total of 110 patients with ISR are assigned to drug eluted stent treated group after randomization schedule.

Group Type OTHER

drug eluted stent

Intervention Type DEVICE

with regular techniques

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

drug coated balloon

Balloon/vessel diameter ratio 0.8-1.0, 8-12 ATM (atmosphere), lasting for \>30 seconds.

Intervention Type DEVICE

drug eluted stent

with regular techniques

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

● Meet the diagnostic criteria for patients with coronary in-stent restenosis and QFR\<0.8 of target lesion in the coronary stent

Exclusion Criteria

* QFR less than 0.8, dissection above type B and thrombosis formation after pre-dilation of ISR
* Severe congestive heart failure \[LVEF \<30% or NYHA( New York Heart Association) III/IV)\]
* Severe valvular heart disease
* Life expectancy no more than 1 year or factors causing difficulties in clinical follow up
* Intolerance to aspirin and/or clopidogrel
* Known intolerance or allergy to heparin, contrast agents, paclitaxel, iopromide, rapamycin, polylactic acid-glycolic acid copolymer, Co-Cr alloy or platinum-chromium alloy
* Leukopenia or thrombopenia
* A history of peptic ulcer or GI bleeding in the previously
* Stroke within 6 months prior to the operation
* A history of severe hepatic or renal failure
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Fei Ye, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nanjing First Hospital

Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Fei Ye, MD

Role: CONTACT

+86 13327823900

Xiangqi Wu, MD

Role: CONTACT

+86 15250997876

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jie Zhou

Role: primary

+8613913893984

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kolh P, Windecker S, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, Falk V, Filippatos G, Hamm C, Head SJ, Juni P, Kappetein AP, Kastrati A, Knuuti J, Landmesser U, Laufer G, Neumann FJ, Richter DJ, Schauerte P, Sousa Uva M, Stefanini GG, Taggart DP, Torracca L, Valgimigli M, Wijns W, Witkowski A; European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines; Zamorano JL, Achenbach S, Baumgartner H, Bax JJ, Bueno H, Dean V, Deaton C, Erol C, Fagard R, Ferrari R, Hasdai D, Hoes AW, Kirchhof P, Knuuti J, Kolh P, Lancellotti P, Linhart A, Nihoyannopoulos P, Piepoli MF, Ponikowski P, Sirnes PA, Tamargo JL, Tendera M, Torbicki A, Wijns W, Windecker S; EACTS Clinical Guidelines Committee; Sousa Uva M, Achenbach S, Pepper J, Anyanwu A, Badimon L, Bauersachs J, Baumbach A, Beygui F, Bonaros N, De Carlo M, Deaton C, Dobrev D, Dunning J, Eeckhout E, Gielen S, Hasdai D, Kirchhof P, Luckraz H, Mahrholdt H, Montalescot G, Paparella D, Rastan AJ, Sanmartin M, Sergeant P, Silber S, Tamargo J, ten Berg J, Thiele H, van Geuns RJ, Wagner HO, Wassmann S, Wendler O, Zamorano JL; Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery; European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Oct;46(4):517-92. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu366. Epub 2014 Aug 29. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25173601 (View on PubMed)

Wong YTA, Kang DY, Lee JB, Rha SW, Hong YJ, Shin ES, Her SH, Nam CW, Chung WY, Kim MH, Lee CH, Lee PH, Ahn JM, Kang SJ, Lee SW, Kim YH, Lee CW, Park SW, Park DW, Park SJ. Comparison of drug-eluting stents and drug-coated balloon for the treatment of drug-eluting coronary stent restenosis: A randomized RESTORE trial. Am Heart J. 2018 Mar;197:35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.11.008. Epub 2017 Nov 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29447782 (View on PubMed)

Xu B, Tu S, Qiao S, Qu X, Chen Y, Yang J, Guo L, Sun Z, Li Z, Tian F, Fang W, Chen J, Li W, Guan C, Holm NR, Wijns W, Hu S. Diagnostic Accuracy of Angiography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio Measurements for Online Assessment of Coronary Stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 26;70(25):3077-3087. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.035. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29101020 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KY201910

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

DCB in de Novo Coronary Lesion
NCT03691675 UNKNOWN NA
DCB for CAD With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT07009938 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA