Multidisciplinary Translational Approach to Investigate Mechanisms Predictors & Prevention of Persistent PTH
NCT ID: NCT04098250
Last Updated: 2025-10-23
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
6 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-01-04
2024-01-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The objective of the clinical trial component of the Focused Program is to determine whether intervention with erenumab is an effective treatment for PTH attributed to mTBI.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Investigate the Mechanisms, Predictors, and Prevention of Persistent Post-Traumatic Headache
NCT04369729
Efficacy and Tolerability of Erenumab in the Prophylactic Treatment of Persistent Post-Traumatic Headache
NCT03974360
Treatment of Acute PTH With a CGRP Receptor mAb in Military Service Members and Civilians With mTBI
NCT05049057
Study of Intravenous Erenumab in Patients With Status Migrainosus
NCT04920331
A Study to Test if Fremanezumab Reduces Headache in Participants With Posttraumatic Headache (PTH)
NCT03347188
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The clinical trial is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled investigation of erenumab for the treatment of post-traumatic headache. Participants will be randomized when PTH has been present for 35-56 days. Follow-up questionnaires, headache diary data, pain threshold results, and brain imaging data will be collected longitudinally during the clinical trial to assess for changes over time and associations of such changes with post-traumatic headache treatment outcomes. Due to slow enrollment, the study was later changed to open label since the estimated total enrollment would be inadequate for making comparisons between the placebo and erenumab groups.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Erenumab
140 mg erenumab
Erenumab
a CGRP receptor monoclonal antibody
Placebo
placebo comparator
Placebo
Placebo
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Erenumab
a CGRP receptor monoclonal antibody
Placebo
Placebo
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* PTH onset 7-56 days prior to the time of enrollment
* Adults 18-70 years of age
* Willing to be randomized to either of the two clinical trial treatment arms
* Willing to maintain a headache diary
* Willing and able to return for follow-up visits
* 4 or more moderate or severe headache days during the 4-week run-in phase and an increase of at least 2 moderate to severe headache days compared to pre-TBI and at least a 30% increase
* At least 80% compliant with diary keeping during the 4-week run-in phase (i.e., provides data on at least 80% of days)
Exclusion Criteria
* Diminished decision-making capacity that in the investigator's opinion would interfere with the person's ability to provide informed consent and complete study procedures
* Started or changed dose of a headache preventive medication within the 3 months prior to screening
* Use of onabotulinumtoxinA in the head, neck or face region within 6 months of screening
* During the 6 months before screening, use of opioids or barbiturates on an average of at least 4 days per month
* Subjects who underwent an intervention or used a device (e.g., nerve blocks, transcranial magnetic stimulation, vagal nerve stimulation, or electrical trigeminal nerve stimulation) for headache within 3 months of screening
* History of major psychiatric disorder such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder
* History or evidence of any unstable or clinically significant medical condition, that in the opinion of the investigator, would pose a risk to subject safety or interfere with the study evaluation, procedures, or completion
* History of positive neuroimaging findings that indicate a moderate or severe TBI
* Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging, including, but not limited to (only an exclusion for patients participating in the brain MRI portion of this research):
1. Metal implants
2. Aneurysm clips
3. Severe claustrophobia
4. Implanted electronic device
5. Insulin or infusion pump
6. Cochlear/otologic/ear implant
7. Non-removable prosthesis
8. Implanted shunts/catheters
9. Certain intrauterine devices
10. Tattooed makeup
11. Body piercings that cannot be removed
12. Metal fragments
13. Wire sutures or metal staples
* Factors that reduce MR image quality and interpretability (only an exclusion for patients participating in the brain MRI portion of this research):
1. Dental braces or other non-removable devices (e.g., retainers)
2. Prior brain surgery
3. Known brain MRI abnormality that in the investigator's opinion will significantly impact MRI data
* Sensory disorders that in the investigator's opinion might affect perception of cutaneous thermal stimuli (e.g., peripheral neuropathy) (only an exclusion for patients participating in the neurophysiology studies)
* Pregnancy
* Breastfeeding
* History of myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischemic attack, unstable angina, coronary artery bypass surgery, or other revascularization procedures within 12 months prior to screening.
* Not willing to use a reliable form of contraception (for women of childbearing potential) through 16 weeks after the last dose of erenumab. Acceptable methods of birth control include not having intercourse, hormonal birth control methods, intrauterine devices, surgical contraceptive methods, or two barrier methods (each partner must use a barrier method) with spermicide. A reliable form of contraception must be started prior to or at the time of starting the run-in phase. Not being of childbearing potential is defined as any woman who is post-menopausal by history, defined as:
1. At least 55 years of age with cessation of menses for 12 or more months; OR
2. Younger than 55 years of age but no spontaneous menses for at least 2 years; OR
3. Younger than 55 years of age and spontaneous menses within the past 1 year, but currently amenorrheic (e.g., spontaneous or secondary to hysterectomy), AND with postmenopausal gonadotropin levels (luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone levels at least 40 IU/L) or postmenopausal estradiol level (less than 5 ng/dL) or according to the definition of "postmenopausal range" for the laboratory involved; OR
4. Underwent bilateral oophorectomy; OR
5. Underwent hysterectomy; OR
6. Underwent bilateral salpingectomy.
* Currently or within 90 days prior to screening: received treatment in another drug study or an investigational device study
* Has previously received any CGRP ligand or receptor targeted monoclonal antibody
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Arizona
OTHER
Translational Genomics Research Institute
OTHER
Arizona State University
OTHER
Phoenix VA Health Care System
FED
United States Department of Defense
FED
Amgen
INDUSTRY
Georgia Institute of Technology
OTHER
Mayo Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Todd J. Schwedt
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Todd Schwedt
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mayo Clinic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Phoenix VA Health Care System
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Mayo Clinic
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Mayo Clinic in Arizona
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Mayo Clinic
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
19-003200
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.