Head-to-head Study of Erenumab Against Topiramate in Patients With Episodic and Chronic Migraine

NCT ID: NCT03828539

Last Updated: 2021-10-11

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

777 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-02-22

Study Completion Date

2020-07-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study used a single-cohort, 2-treatment arm, parallel-group randomized, double-blind, double-dummy design in adult patients with episodic migraine and chronic migraine, who had to be either naïve or not suitable for or could have failed up to three prophylactic treatments out of: propranolol/metoprolol, amitriptyline, flunarizine. Patients were stratified into groups according to their number of migraine days during the baseline period.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

All patients completing the Baseline period and fulfilling baseline eligibility criteria were invited to participate to the Double-blind, double-dummy Treatment Epoch (DBTE, 24 weeks) .

Eligible patients were randomized to one of two treatment arms. DBTE started with a titration phase for topiramate of a maximum of 6 weeks to determine the maximal tolerated dose and aimed to reach the recommended treatment dose of 100 mg according to the German SmPC. After the titration phase, maintenance phase started (18 weeks). Topiramate dose had to be maintained until the end of the DBTE. Erenumab dose at beginning of the DBTE was determined patient individually by the investigator based on the guidance provided in the SmPC and was either 70 mg or 140 mg. Dose escalation from 70 mg to 140 mg in case of insufficient response was considered at anytime during the DBTE.

Dose reduction of topiramate and erenumab was not allowed during DBTE (Week 0 to Week 24). After Week 24 or if the patient discontinued study drug, a one week double-blind taper off phase followed to ensure proper down titration for topiramate. At the end of the DBTE (24 weeks) the final assessment occurred to address the objectives.

A Follow-Up Visit 4 weeks after last study visit (or 8 weeks after last IMP injection for discontinued patients) was required as part of routine safety monitoring. The primary analysis was triggered when all patients had completed their respective last visit of the DBTE.

The End of study occurred when the last patient completed last visit (LPLV).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Migraine

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Erenumab

70 mg and 140 mg Erenumab

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Erenumab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

70mg/1mL (70 mg) or 2x70mg/1mL (140 mg) in pre-filled syringe, administered every 4 weeks

Erenumab matching placebo

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Erenumab matching placebo pre-filled syringue administered every 4 weeks

Topiramate

Topiramate in the highest tolerated dose (50 - 100 mg/day)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Topiramate

Intervention Type DRUG

Film-coated tablet taken orally:

25 mg administered once daily (first week of titration phase). After the first week, titration was done according to the summary of product characteristics (SmPC) in 25 mg increments each week and aimed to reach the recommended daily treatment dose of 100 mg (50/75/100 mg). 50/75/100 mg were administered twice daily during titration phase and maintenance phase.

Topiramate matching placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Topiramate matching placebo administered daily

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Erenumab

70mg/1mL (70 mg) or 2x70mg/1mL (140 mg) in pre-filled syringe, administered every 4 weeks

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Topiramate

Film-coated tablet taken orally:

25 mg administered once daily (first week of titration phase). After the first week, titration was done according to the summary of product characteristics (SmPC) in 25 mg increments each week and aimed to reach the recommended daily treatment dose of 100 mg (50/75/100 mg). 50/75/100 mg were administered twice daily during titration phase and maintenance phase.

Intervention Type DRUG

Erenumab matching placebo

Erenumab matching placebo pre-filled syringue administered every 4 weeks

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Topiramate matching placebo

Topiramate matching placebo administered daily

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

AMG334 Topamax

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Documented history of migraine in the 12 months prior to screen
2. at least 4 days per month of migraine symptoms
3. \>=80% diary compliance during the Baseline period
4. Patients must be either naïve or not suitable or have failed previous migraine prophylactic treatments

Exclusion Criteria

1. Older than 50 years of age at migraine onset
2. Pregnant or nursing
3. History of cluster or hemiplegic headache
4. History or evidence of major psychiatric disorder
5. Score of 19 or higher on Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Novartis Investigative Site

Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Marburg Wehrda, Germany, Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Alzenau in Unterfranken, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bad Homburg, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bad Honnef, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bad Saarow, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bayreuth, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bergen, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bielefeld, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bochum, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bonn, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bonn, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Böblingen, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Celle, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Chemnitz, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Dillingen, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Erbach im Odenwald, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Gelsenkirchen, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Greifswald, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Haar, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Halle, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Heidenheim, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Hoppegarten, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Ibbenbueren, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Jülich, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kassel, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kassel, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Königstein im Taunus, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lünen, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Mannheim, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Mittweida, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

München, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

München, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Neu-Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Neuburg an der Donau, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Osnabrück, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Pforzheim, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Quakenbrück, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Regensburg, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Rostock, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Rülzheim, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Schwerin, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Schwerin, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Seesen, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Siegen, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Sindelfingen, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Stadtroda, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Stuttgart, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Stuttgart, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Stuttgart, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Trier, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Tübingen, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Unterhaching, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Westerstede/Oldenburg, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Wiesbaden, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Würzburg, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ehrlich M, Hentschke C, Sieder C, Maier-Peuschel M, Reuter U. Erenumab versus topiramate: post hoc efficacy analysis from the HER-MES study. J Headache Pain. 2022 Nov 15;23(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s10194-022-01511-y.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36380284 (View on PubMed)

Reuter U, Ehrlich M, Gendolla A, Heinze A, Klatt J, Wen S, Hours-Zesiger P, Nickisch J, Sieder C, Hentschke C, Maier-Peuschel M. Erenumab versus topiramate for the prevention of migraine - a randomised, double-blind, active-controlled phase 4 trial. Cephalalgia. 2022 Feb;42(2):108-118. doi: 10.1177/03331024211053571. Epub 2021 Nov 7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34743579 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.novctrd.com/ctrdweb/patientsummary/patientsummaries?patientSummaryId=941

A Plain Language Trial Summary is available on novartisclinicaltrials.com

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2018-000943-15

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CAMG334ADE01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Registry for Migraine - Clinical Core
NCT04603976 UNKNOWN PHASE4
Migraine Survey in Gulf Region
NCT06237062 TERMINATED