The Effectiveness of Neurofeedback for the Treatment of Chronic Pain

NCT ID: NCT04097522

Last Updated: 2020-04-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

102 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-12-03

Study Completion Date

2020-10-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study evaluates the effectiveness of neurofeedback (teaching participants to gain control over their own brainwaves) in chronic pain. The study is made up of four pilot studies. Participants who take part will undergo the cold pressor test, submerging their hand in cold water in order to simulate chronic pain. Brain activity will be measured using electroencephalography (EEG).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Chronic pain is a persisting pain which often exists in the absence of detectable tissue damage. It is also associated with feelings of depression, anxiety, and despair. Current treatments for chronic pain usually involves drug treatments, which often has unwanted side effects.

This study aims to assess the effectiveness of neurofeedback, which refers to teaching participants to gain control over their own brainwaves, as an intervention to treat chronic pain. It is believed that by teaching participants to gain control over a brain signal associated with pain resilience, the participant can reduce some of the negative effects associated with chronic pain.

Participants who take part in this study will have their brain activity recorded using electroencephalography (EEG), and have pain elicited using the cold pressor test (CPT), which involves the participant submerging their wrist in cold water to elicit a chronic pain-like sensation. This is a safe, regularly used method, and the participant is free to remove their hand early if the pain becomes too great.

Some participants who take part will undergo neurofeedback training, which will involve them viewing a signal associated with pain resilience, and learning to increase it over multiple sessions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Half of the participants that take part in the neurofeedback procedures will receive sham neurofeedback, whilst the other half will receive neurofeedback from an area the investigators believe to be associated with increasing pain resilience. Participants may or may not receive sham neurofeedback, and will be made aware of this fact.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators
A number of the studies include double-blind neurofeedback, where half of the participants receive sham neurofeedback, and half receive actual neurofeedback from a region thought to increase pain resilience. The experimenter, participant, and care provider will all be blinded as to which condition the participant is in until the participant leaves the study.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

real neurofeedback

Participants receive neurofeedback from a region of the brain thought to be associated with increasing pain resilience

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Neurofeedback

Intervention Type OTHER

During the neurofeedback intervention, participants will be shown visual representations of their own brain activity in real-time. Over a number of sessions participants will teach themselves to increase this brain activity, in order to increase their own pain resilience levels.

sham neurofeedback

Participants receive neurofeedback from a region of the brain thought to be unrelated with increasing pain resilience

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Neurofeedback

Intervention Type OTHER

During the neurofeedback intervention, participants will be shown visual representations of their own brain activity in real-time. Over a number of sessions participants will teach themselves to increase this brain activity, in order to increase their own pain resilience levels.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Neurofeedback

During the neurofeedback intervention, participants will be shown visual representations of their own brain activity in real-time. Over a number of sessions participants will teach themselves to increase this brain activity, in order to increase their own pain resilience levels.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study
* Must be aged 40 or older

Exclusion Criteria

* Current or planned hospitalisation during the period of study.
* Non-English speaking participants
* Participants already involved in clinical trials, if it is not possible to schedule around this
* Unable, in the opinion of the research investigator, to comply or adhere to the requirements of the study.
* Patients with chronic pain in both upper limbs
* History of brain injury, stroke or neurosurgical procedures
* An implanted neurostimulator (e.g., deep brain stimulator)
* Damaged skin tissue on the head, or a skin condition such as severe eczema, or any skin allergies
* Failure of cognitive test (Montreal Cognitive Assessment) will exclude participants from taking part in studies that use neurofeedback procedures
* Some but not all of the study will be unavailable to participants currently undergoing psychotherapy (such as cognitive behavioural therapy).
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

TIYGA Health

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Manchester

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Anthony Jones

Clinical Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust

Salford, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

James Henshaw, PhD

Role: CONTACT

0161 206 4528

Tim Rainey

Role: CONTACT

01612060205

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

James Henshaw, PhD

Role: primary

0161 206 4528

Tim Rainey

Role: backup

0161 206 0205

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

244779

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Acupuncture and Pain Processing
NCT01270607 COMPLETED NA