Impact of Diet and Physical Activity Changes on Body Weight, Biomarkers and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Survivors
NCT ID: NCT04096469
Last Updated: 2019-10-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-05-01
2019-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Promoting a Healthier Lifestyle Among Breast Cancer Survivors
NCT01419613
Promoting Activity in Cancer Survivors
NCT03060941
Feasibility of High Levels of Energy Expenditure From Physical Activity for Breast Cancer Survivors
NCT02963740
Lifestyle Intervention for High Risk Cancer Survivors
NCT01508273
Physical Activity or Usual Care in Preventing Weight Gain in Women With Stage I or Stage II Breast Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy
NCT00509626
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Specific objectives
1. Determine the adherence of participants to a healthy lifestyle intervention by analyzing biological markers of dietary intake (alpha and beta carotene, as well as lipid profile) at the beginning of the study and at 4 and 8 months after initiation of the intervention.
2. Investigate the impact of the intervention on changes in weight, body mass index, body fat, muscle mass and bone mineral density of women by measuring these variables at the beginning of the study and at 4 and 8 months after intervention.
3. Examine the effect of the intervention on biomarkers of the disease: mammographic density, telomere length and telomerase activity, VEGF, DNA methylation and CPTP at baseline and 8 months.
4. To evaluate the impact of the intervention program on inflammatory markers: leptin and adiponectin, IL6, IL8, CRP and TNF-α at the beginning, 4 and 8 months after the intervention started.
5. Analyze the effect of the intervention on the alterations in sleep quality and quality of life of the women survivors of breast cancer at the beginning, 4 and 8 months after the intervention.
Study Design and Participants
This was a randomized controlled clinical trial with two groups of breast cancer survivors. In the intervention group, we used the strategy of Motivational Interviewing to promote changes in diet and physical activity; the comparison group received an orientation with a traditional educational approach. The intervention program lasted eight months. A total of 60 women from Sonora, Mexico, participated in the study. The women were selected from the State Oncology Center and through social networks. The research protocol was sent to the ethics committee of the Center for Research in Food and Development, A.C. and women signed an informed consent letter to participate in the study.
Visits and monitoring
After the recruitment, application of questionnaires and blood sampling at the first visit (baseline), the participants were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 30) or the comparison group (n = 30). The orientation was similar in both groups and was carried out in two modalities: in person at the participant's house and by telephone. The first orientation was made within the first 15 days after the first visit (baseline) and was at the participant's home. Within a week of the first initial orientation, the participants were called by phone to continue the monitoring and orientation process. During the first four months, the orientation was every fifteen days, and combined the visits to the participant's house with phone calls. During the next four months, the orientation took place once a month and at the participant's house.
Intervention program for changes in lifestyle
Guidance on lifestyle changes in the intervention group was carried out using the motivational interviewing approach and was conducted by trained personnel for that purpose. The dietary intervention was designed to promote the increase in plasma carotene levels, due to the increase in the consumption of fruits and vegetables. The intervention also promoted the improvement of the lipid profile (due to the decrease in fat consumption) and the control or reduction of body weight.
The diet and physical activity components of the lifestyle change program were progressive, and we managed individualized interventions. Both the diet and the physical activity regimen could be adjusted to any unexpected situation (e.g., Decrease in the number of steps due to stomach problems or ankle sprains) during the entire participation period.
The dietary goals contemplated to reach a consumption of 20% of the total energy coming from fats, the consumption of 6 or more servings of fruits / vegetables a day and the promotion of a healthy body weight, to increase fiber consumption to a greater than 30 grams daily, decrease the consumption of sugary drinks and increase the consumption of protein. The emphasis on dietary fat restriction helped to achieve other dietary goals, such as increased consumption of vegetables and fruits, increased fiber consumption, and mild to moderate body weight loss. To reach the goal of having a fat intake in the diet of 20% of the total energy consumed, a goal of grams of fat was established for each participant.
The component of physical activity consisted of a moderately low aerobic regime with the aim of gradually increasing the number of steps per week, in order to be able to walk at least 4000 steps (in addition to those that are already routine) per day or 28,000 steps per week. In addition, participants were encouraged to reduce sedentary time, by performing simple exercises while sitting and stretching exercises, among others.
The educational materials covered different topics such as knowing how to read and interpret the labels on food, recommendations for buying food, recommendations for eating out and others. The visits and orientation calls included a brief assessment of the food consumed and the physical activity performed the previous day, as well as a review of the list of weekly behavior goals and lifestyle journals, which helped the counselor to assess adherence to lifestyle goals and provide specific encouragement and feedback to the participant. Lifestyle journals were used to assess the intake of fat grams as well as daily steps to assess adherence and identify specific barriers to compliance with behavioral goals.
Comparison group
This group received a notebook that included general health information. As with the intervention group, they were provided with a pedometer and common literature on recommendations to stay physically active. Participants in this group were not asked to record their diet or physical activity, and guidance was provided monthly during the 8-month intervention.
Collection of information
The collection of the information was carried out in the two groups. The sociodemographic and health data of the participants were obtained in the first visit. The anthropometric and body composition measurements, as well as the application of questionnaires on sleep quality and quality of life were carried out at the first visit (day 1), 4 and 8 months after the intervention as well the dietary evaluation. The blood samples for the analysis of carotenoids, lipid profile, , VEGF, DNA methylation, and proinflammatory markers were taken on the first day, at 4 and 8 months. The mammographic density analysis, telomere length, and telomerase activity were carried out at the beginning of the study and at 8 months.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Motivational Interviewing
The intervention group received a guidance regarding their diet and physical activity using the motivational interviewing strategy to improve adherence to healthy behaviors. Participants received a guide with a motivational interviewing approach, which served as the basis for the interview process. The objectives in the intervention group were to consume four vegetables and two fruits a day, seven days a week, increase fiber consumption to more than 30 g daily, reduce fat consumption to no more 20% of the total energy consumed, decrease the consumption of sugary drinks and increase protein intake. Another goal was to increase the number of steps to 4,000 additional steps to those who have already walked.
Motivational Interviewing
The motivational interviewing strengthens the motivation and commitment to achieve a specific change through the induction and exploration of the reasons for modifying behavior. All this within an atmosphere of acceptance and compassion. It is about extracting the possible solutions to the change that is faced from the individual and his environment and not from the professional. This strategy is achieved by looking for the patient to feel motivated, and to express their problem and thus create discrepancy so that they evaluate their actions and reflect on the changes they should make.
Traditional Education
The comparison group received a guide on medical care and nutrition with a traditional educational approach. The indication was to read and learn about the health-related topics included in the booklet that was given to them. These participants were visited in the same way as the intervention group to answer questions and monitor participation throughout the intervention.
Traditional Education
Traditional education refers to the normal care given to breast cancer survivors. That is, they receive recommendations about their physical activity and diet but without any motivational approach.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Motivational Interviewing
The motivational interviewing strengthens the motivation and commitment to achieve a specific change through the induction and exploration of the reasons for modifying behavior. All this within an atmosphere of acceptance and compassion. It is about extracting the possible solutions to the change that is faced from the individual and his environment and not from the professional. This strategy is achieved by looking for the patient to feel motivated, and to express their problem and thus create discrepancy so that they evaluate their actions and reflect on the changes they should make.
Traditional Education
Traditional education refers to the normal care given to breast cancer survivors. That is, they receive recommendations about their physical activity and diet but without any motivational approach.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Have at least 6 weeks and no more than 2 years of completing your therapy at the time of recruitment
* Do not present metastasis
* Not having a special diet or rigorous physical activity
* Not suffer any chronic illness or physical limitation
* Not have depression problems
* Sign the informed consent letter
Exclusion Criteria
* Strict diet or be a vegetarian
* Body mass index below 18
* Having undergone surgery to lose weight
* Having excision in both breasts or having implants
18 Years
73 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Council of Science and Technology, Mexico
OTHER
Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo A.C.
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Graciela Caire Juvera, PhD
PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Graciela Caire Juvera, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CIAD
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo
Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
262211
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
60252
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.