Continuous Intrapartum Support to Reduce Primary Cesarean

NCT ID: NCT04086277

Last Updated: 2019-09-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

115 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-10-01

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of the study was to evaluate the intervention of intrapartum continuous support by a professional nurse with a university degree to reduce the nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex (NTSV) cesarean birth rate, in women pregnant less than 40 years in the HGZ No. 4 of the Guanajuato delegation of the Mexican Institute of Social Security, Mexico

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Continuous intrapartum support is a strategy used to decrease the cesarean section rate, where multiple factors influence its effectiveness (start and duration of support, professional training of support staff, and others.). The objective of the study was to decrease the rate of deliveries by cesarean, through continuous intrapartum support during the active phase until birth, by a professional nurse with a university degree, the support was based on three basic aspects: 1) emotional support, 2) physical support and comfort measures and 3) information and counseling, for which a quasi-experimental study was conducted, with a study population of 115 women in labour (nulliparous, full-term, single product, vertex position) and under 40 years, a group control was formed (n = 55) who received routine maternal care and a study group (n = 60) who received continuous intrapartum support.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cesarean Section Complications

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The control group was composed of women with labour, who attended the General Hospital of Zone 4 of the Guanajuato Delegation of the IMSS in the period of October-December 2016. The study group was composed of women with labour who presented at the same hospital to receive obstetric care in the period of October - December 2018.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Women in labor with continuous intrapartum support

Continuous intrapartum support was based on three basic aspects: 1) emotional support, 2) physical support and comfort measures and 3) information and advice.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Continuous Intrapartum Support

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Received the usual obstetric care plus continuous intrapartum support that was provided by a Bachelor of Nursing and Obstetrics who received prior training by a professional doula.

Women in labor without continuous intrapartum support.

The no intervention group received the usual obstetric care, without continuous intrapartum support.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Continuous Intrapartum Support

Received the usual obstetric care plus continuous intrapartum support that was provided by a Bachelor of Nursing and Obstetrics who received prior training by a professional doula.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women pregnant
* Nulliparous
* Term pregnancy
* Singleton pregnancy
* Vertex position

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with maternal, fetal, or mixed cesarean indications were excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

14 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fondo de Investigación en Salud (FIS), México

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

IMSS Hospital General de Zona 4, Celaya, Guanajauto, Mexico

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Luz Maria Cardona Torres

Subjefe de Educación e Investigación en Salud

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Luz M Cardona, Master

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

IMSS Hospital General de Zona 4, Celaya, Guanajauto, México

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

IMSS Hospital General de Zona 4

Celaya, Guanajuato, Mexico

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Mexico

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

World Health Organization and Human Reproduction Programme. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. Statement. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research ; 2015.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Bohren MA, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C, Fukuzawa RK, Cuthbert A. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 6;7(7):CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28681500 (View on PubMed)

Kabakian-Khasholian T, Portela A. Companion of choice at birth: factors affecting implementation. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Aug 31;17(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1447-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28854903 (View on PubMed)

McGrath SK, Kennell JH. A randomized controlled trial of continuous labor support for middle-class couples: effect on cesarean delivery rates. Birth. 2008 Jun;35(2):92-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00221.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18507579 (View on PubMed)

Kashanian M, Javadi F, Haghighi MM. Effect of continuous support during labor on duration of labor and rate of cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 Jun;109(3):198-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.11.028. Epub 2010 Feb 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20152972 (View on PubMed)

Khresheh R. Support in the first stage of labour from a female relative: the first step in improving the quality of maternity services. Midwifery. 2010 Dec;26(6):e21-4. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2008.11.003. Epub 2009 Jan 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19128863 (View on PubMed)

Wang M, Song Q, Xu J, Hu Z, Gong Y, Lee AC, Chen Q. Continuous support during labour in childbirth: a Cross-Sectional study in a university teaching hospital in Shanghai, China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Dec 6;18(1):480. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2119-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30522458 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

LMCT-02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Family-Centered Cesarean Delivery
NCT02690077 COMPLETED NA