Continuous Intrapartum Support to Reduce Primary Cesarean
NCT ID: NCT04086277
Last Updated: 2019-09-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
115 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-10-01
2018-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Perioperative Warming Measures in Cesarean Delivery
NCT05015582
Pre-warming Prevents Hypothermia in Elective Cesarean Section
NCT02091466
Extra Sitting Time After Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section and Fetal Well-being
NCT02893696
Effect of Tourniquet Binding of Cervical on the Blood Volume of Amniotic Fluid in Cesarean Section
NCT06254092
Suture Material for Closure of Hysterotomy
NCT03026647
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Women in labor with continuous intrapartum support
Continuous intrapartum support was based on three basic aspects: 1) emotional support, 2) physical support and comfort measures and 3) information and advice.
Continuous Intrapartum Support
Received the usual obstetric care plus continuous intrapartum support that was provided by a Bachelor of Nursing and Obstetrics who received prior training by a professional doula.
Women in labor without continuous intrapartum support.
The no intervention group received the usual obstetric care, without continuous intrapartum support.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Continuous Intrapartum Support
Received the usual obstetric care plus continuous intrapartum support that was provided by a Bachelor of Nursing and Obstetrics who received prior training by a professional doula.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Nulliparous
* Term pregnancy
* Singleton pregnancy
* Vertex position
Exclusion Criteria
14 Years
40 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fondo de Investigación en Salud (FIS), México
UNKNOWN
IMSS Hospital General de Zona 4, Celaya, Guanajauto, Mexico
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Luz Maria Cardona Torres
Subjefe de Educación e Investigación en Salud
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Luz M Cardona, Master
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
IMSS Hospital General de Zona 4, Celaya, Guanajauto, México
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
IMSS Hospital General de Zona 4
Celaya, Guanajuato, Mexico
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
World Health Organization and Human Reproduction Programme. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. Statement. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research ; 2015.
Bohren MA, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C, Fukuzawa RK, Cuthbert A. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 6;7(7):CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub6.
Kabakian-Khasholian T, Portela A. Companion of choice at birth: factors affecting implementation. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Aug 31;17(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1447-9.
McGrath SK, Kennell JH. A randomized controlled trial of continuous labor support for middle-class couples: effect on cesarean delivery rates. Birth. 2008 Jun;35(2):92-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00221.x.
Kashanian M, Javadi F, Haghighi MM. Effect of continuous support during labor on duration of labor and rate of cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 Jun;109(3):198-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.11.028. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
Khresheh R. Support in the first stage of labour from a female relative: the first step in improving the quality of maternity services. Midwifery. 2010 Dec;26(6):e21-4. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2008.11.003. Epub 2009 Jan 6.
Wang M, Song Q, Xu J, Hu Z, Gong Y, Lee AC, Chen Q. Continuous support during labour in childbirth: a Cross-Sectional study in a university teaching hospital in Shanghai, China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Dec 6;18(1):480. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2119-0.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LMCT-02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.