Assessing Opioid Care Practices Using CPV Patient Simulation Modules
NCT ID: NCT04080037
Last Updated: 2020-02-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
220 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-09-03
2019-10-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Suicide Prediction and Prevention for People at Risk for Opioid Use Disorder: Supplement to COMPUTE 2.0
NCT04939727
Clinical Decision Support for Opioid Use Disorders in Medical Settings: Usability Testing in an EMR
NCT03559179
Developing and Evaluating a Machine-Learning Opioid Overdose Prediction & Risk-Stratification Tool in Primary Care
NCT06810076
Patient-Centered Care for Opioid Use Disorders in Federally Qualified Healthcare Centers and Specialty Care Settings
NCT03367234
Harnessing Online Peer Education Opioid Study
NCT05814315
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigators' previous work has shown that patient simulations can rapidly and reliably measure unwarranted practice variation among providers. In addition, published work shows that patient simulations, when administered serially and combined with customized feedback on improvement opportunities can reduce practice variation and improve performance on patient-level quality measures. Given the challenge of the current opioid crisis and the large scope of unwarranted variation in medical practice, there is a need for scalable approaches to measure care decisions, provide feedback on improvement opportunities and benchmark performance to peers.
This study seeks to evaluate the impact of personalized measurement and feedback on evidence-based care decisions made by primary care providers across the country concerning opioid care. The study, a prospective cohort trial, will enroll primary care physicians (PCPs) practicing in the U.S. Upon enrollment, eligible providers will be asked to complete a questionnaire detailing their practice and professional background. They will then be asked to complete the following:
Pretest: Pre-project, participants will take a multiple-choice assessment test. These assessments measure CDC Opioid Guidelines knowledge and adherence. Study administrators will randomize half of providers to take Assessment A pre-intervention, and half to take Assessment B pre-intervention, and have attempted to make these two assessments of equal difficulty.
Intervention: All providers will then care for 1 online CPV QualityIQ patient simulation each week over the course of 6 weeks. The simulated patients will be adults aged 18-75 and present with clinical conditions commonly seen by PCPs, such as chronic or acute pain, for whom opioids are currently in use or may be considered. In the patient simulations, participants will make work-up, diagnostic and treatment decisions relevant to the patient's pain management and will receive real-time feedback on how those decisions align with the CDC recommendations. Each week, participants will receive an email notification with their case score from the previous week, how their care compares to their PCP peers, and a link their new case to be completed.
Posttest: Recruits will take the remaining assessment as described above after completion of the intervention.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Study Participants
All eligible and consented participants will be asked complete a multiple-choice opioid assessment based on the latest CDC opioid guidelines, then care for 6 online QualityIQ patient simulations and receive feedback on their care decisions. They will then all complete an other multiple-choice assessment at the conclusion of the study.
Quality IQ Patient Simulations
Online patient cases designed to simulate typical patients seen in a primary care practice. In each case, providers will answer multiple-choice questions about their preferred course of action to work-up, diagnose and treat patients in the primary care setting. After each question, providers will receive evidence-based feedback, including references, on the appropriateness of each of their care decisions. Feedback will be supported with relevant reference to evidence-based guidelines, with a specific focus on the CDC opioid guidelines.
Cases will cover typical primary care patients presenting with acute and chronic pain, who may or may not be already taking opioid medication.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Quality IQ Patient Simulations
Online patient cases designed to simulate typical patients seen in a primary care practice. In each case, providers will answer multiple-choice questions about their preferred course of action to work-up, diagnose and treat patients in the primary care setting. After each question, providers will receive evidence-based feedback, including references, on the appropriateness of each of their care decisions. Feedback will be supported with relevant reference to evidence-based guidelines, with a specific focus on the CDC opioid guidelines.
Cases will cover typical primary care patients presenting with acute and chronic pain, who may or may not be already taking opioid medication.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Minimum patient panel size of 1,000 patients
3. At least 5% of their patients currently or previously using opioid medications
4. English-speaking
5. Access to the internet
6. Informed, signed and voluntarily consented to be in the study
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patient panel size less than 1,000 patients
3. Less than 5% of their patients currently or previously using opioid medications
4. Non-English speaking
5. Unable to access the internet
6. Do not voluntarily consent to be in the study
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ascend Learning
UNKNOWN
Qure Healthcare, LLC
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John Peabody, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
QURE Healthcare
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
QURE Healthcare
San Francisco, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Burgon TB, Cox-Chapman J, Czarnecki C, Kropp R, Guerriere R, Paculdo D, Peabody JW. Engaging Primary Care Providers to Reduce Unwanted Clinical Variation and Support ACO Cost and Quality Goals: A Unique Provider-Payer Collaboration. Popul Health Manag. 2019 Aug;22(4):321-329. doi: 10.1089/pop.2018.0111. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
Weigel PA, Ullrich F, Shane DM, Mueller KJ. Variation in Primary Care Service Patterns by Rural-Urban Location. J Rural Health. 2016 Spring;32(2):196-203. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12146. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Dresselhaus TR, Lee M. Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA. 2000 Apr 5;283(13):1715-22. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.13.1715.
Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Jain S, Hansen J, Spell M, Lee M. Measuring the quality of physician practice by using clinical vignettes: a prospective validation study. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Nov 16;141(10):771-80. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-10-200411160-00008.
Schieber LZ, Guy GP Jr, Seth P, Young R, Mattson CL, Mikosz CA, Schieber RA. Trends and Patterns of Geographic Variation in Opioid Prescribing Practices by State, United States, 2006-2017. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190665. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0665.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
01-QALM-2019
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.