Efficacy of Paracervical Block in Laparoscopic Myomectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial (PALM)

NCT ID: NCT04068766

Last Updated: 2019-08-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

62 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-08-23

Study Completion Date

2020-08-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

It remains controversial whether paracervical block should be performed as a powerful strategy for pain relief in laparoscopic myomectomy (LM), because convincing conclusions are difficult to draw because of the heterogeneous and contradictory nature of the literature. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of paracervical blocks using with 0.5% bupivacaine prior to LM for benign gynecologic conditions on postoperative pain relief.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

However, no study investigating the efficacy of paracervical block in laparoscopic myomectomy on postoperative pain was conducted, to date. Therefore, the goal of this study is to evaluate whether patients who receive a paracervical block of 5% bupivacaine with epinephrine at the time of laparoscopic myomectomy would have lower postoperative pain, with less consumption of rescue analgesics than patients who receive a paracervical block of normal saline.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Uterine Fibroid

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Paracervical block with 5% bupivacaine

The paracervical injection with 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine plus 1:200,000 epinephrine was administrated by the second assistant surgeon into the cervicovaginal junction at 3 and 9 o'clock with a depth of 1 cm after intubation but before fixation of uterine manipulator onto the cervix.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Paracervical block

Intervention Type DEVICE

The paracervical injection with 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine plus 1:200,000 epinephrine or normal saline was administrated by the second assistant surgeon into the cervicovaginal junction at 3 and 9 o'clock with a depth of 1 cm after intubation but before fixation of uterine manipulator onto the cervix.

5% bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

The paracervical injection with 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine plus 1:200,000 epinephrine was administrated by the second assistant surgeon into the cervicovaginal junction at 3 and 9 o'clock with a depth of 1 cm after intubation but before fixation of uterine manipulator onto the cervix.

Paracervical block with normal saline

ck with a depth of 1 cm after intubation but before fixation of uterine manipulator onto the cervix.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Paracervical block

Intervention Type DEVICE

The paracervical injection with 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine plus 1:200,000 epinephrine or normal saline was administrated by the second assistant surgeon into the cervicovaginal junction at 3 and 9 o'clock with a depth of 1 cm after intubation but before fixation of uterine manipulator onto the cervix.

Normal saline

Intervention Type DRUG

The paracervical injection with 10 mL of normal saline was administrated by the second assistant surgeon into the cervicovaginal junction at 3 and 9 o'clock with a depth of 1 cm after intubation but before fixation of uterine manipulator onto the cervix.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Paracervical block

The paracervical injection with 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine plus 1:200,000 epinephrine or normal saline was administrated by the second assistant surgeon into the cervicovaginal junction at 3 and 9 o'clock with a depth of 1 cm after intubation but before fixation of uterine manipulator onto the cervix.

Intervention Type DEVICE

5% bupivacaine

The paracervical injection with 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine plus 1:200,000 epinephrine was administrated by the second assistant surgeon into the cervicovaginal junction at 3 and 9 o'clock with a depth of 1 cm after intubation but before fixation of uterine manipulator onto the cervix.

Intervention Type DRUG

Normal saline

The paracervical injection with 10 mL of normal saline was administrated by the second assistant surgeon into the cervicovaginal junction at 3 and 9 o'clock with a depth of 1 cm after intubation but before fixation of uterine manipulator onto the cervix.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Experimental arm Control arm Experimental arm Control arm

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Uterine myoma
* American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASAPS) classification I-II
* The absence of pregnancy at the time of surgery.

Exclusion Criteria

* history of cervical surgery such as conization or cerclage
* inability to perform the paracervical block due to anatomical abnormalities (i.e., very atrophic or small cervix)
* allergy to bupivacaine, planned concomitant surgical procedures involving extensive additional tissue manipulation such as pelvic lymph node dissection
* any concomitant surgery of pelvic floor repair (uterosacral ligament suspension or sacrocolpopexy) or vaginal procedure (anterior or posterior colporrhaphy or mid-urethral slings)
* previously taking opioids for chronic pain
* inability to accurately express their pain
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kangbuk Samsung Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Taejong Song

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Taejong Song

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Kangbuk Samsung Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kangbuk Samsung Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status RECRUITING

Wonju Severance Christian Hospital

Wŏnju, , South Korea

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Taejong Song, MD PhD

Role: CONTACT

+821040358405

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Taejong Song

Role: primary

1040358405

San-Hui Lee, M.D.

Role: primary

+821040358405

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KBSMC 2019-08-024

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pilot of Letrozole for Uterine Myomas
NCT02470741 COMPLETED PHASE4
Efficacy of In-bag Morcellation
NCT03281460 COMPLETED NA