Freestyle Prosthesis for Aortic Root-replacement With and Without Hemiarch Replacement
NCT ID: NCT04068337
Last Updated: 2019-08-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
278 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-08-01
2019-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The Freestyle® prosthesis is also used in cases of dissection of the ascending aorta with the involvement of the aortic valve, which opens the debate on how far the ascending aorta should be replaced for a sustainable solution with calculable low periprocedural risk. Considering a lower intraoperative risk in the life-threatening situation, an extended resection of the aorta can be avoided and only the aortic root replaced with a piece of ascending aorta. On the contrary, focusing on improved long-term outcome, the technique of total arch replacement in aortic dissection was developed in emergency situations with acceptable results, which, however, were often reproducible only in large, experienced centers.
Apart from the abovementioned options, the technique of proximal arch replacement can provide a tension-free anastomosis. The intention of hemiarch replacement is the attachment of the prosthesis to an aneurysm-free portion of the aortic arch helping to protect against further anastomotic aneurysms and spare the patient complex reoperation or interventional procedures in the future. As a possible drawback of the technique, especially in emergency situations, the potentially prolonged duration of surgery and the need of selective brain perfusion via axillary or carotid artery are discussed increasing the risk of stroke and further major events, which could not be reflected in current literature. However, there is still no convincing evidence of a long-term benefit in terms of re-operation and survival after hemiarch replacement.
The aim of this retrospective analysis was to assess the mid-term outcome of the biological Freestyle® prosthesis in combination with operations on the ascending aorta and the aortic arch with regard to prosthetic performance, reoperations, stroke and death.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of the Thoraflex™ Hybrid Device for the Treatment of Aneurysm/dissection of the Descending Thoracic Aorta
NCT03735472
Thoraflex™ Hybrid IDE Study
NCT02724072
ACURATE™ Transapical Aortic Bioprosthesis for Implantation in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis (2010-01)
NCT03143673
ZIPPER™ Stent-Graft Trial for Aortic Arch Dissection
NCT07170332
Clinical Investigation of the Freedom SOLO Stentless Heart Valve
NCT00876525
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Hemiarch
Patients with Freestyle aortic root implantation receiving a hemiarch replacement by open anastomosis technique with axillary cannulation and antegrade cerebral perfusion
Aortic root replacement with Freestyle biological prosthesis with and without hemiarch replacement
Aortic root replacement with Freestyle biological prosthesis. Some patients receive additional hemiarch replacement performing an open anastomosis to the aortic arch under antegrade cerebral perfusion through axillary artery. Comparison with patients, who were cannulated and perfused systemically
Non-Hemiarch
Patients with Freestyle aortic root implantation without hemiarch replacement with normal systemic perfusion
Aortic root replacement with Freestyle biological prosthesis with and without hemiarch replacement
Aortic root replacement with Freestyle biological prosthesis. Some patients receive additional hemiarch replacement performing an open anastomosis to the aortic arch under antegrade cerebral perfusion through axillary artery. Comparison with patients, who were cannulated and perfused systemically
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Aortic root replacement with Freestyle biological prosthesis with and without hemiarch replacement
Aortic root replacement with Freestyle biological prosthesis. Some patients receive additional hemiarch replacement performing an open anastomosis to the aortic arch under antegrade cerebral perfusion through axillary artery. Comparison with patients, who were cannulated and perfused systemically
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* elective, urgent and emergency operations on ascending aneurysms, aortic dissections, endocarditis and aortic root pathologies
* combination of other procedures (coronary artery bypass grafting, operations on mitral and tricuspid valve, ablations)
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Triemli Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Alicja Zientara
resident for cardiac surgery
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Alicja Zientara, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Triemli Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Triemli Hospital
Zurich, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BASEC-Nr. 2018-01227
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.