Safety and Efficacy of Early, seQUential Oral dIuretic Nephron blockAde In Acute Heart Failure
NCT ID: NCT04062760
Last Updated: 2019-08-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
206 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-12-01
2024-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In this study, after 24-72 hours of high-dose intravenous furosemide started at the time of hospital admission, patients admitted with AHF will be randomized to open-label oral treatment with either low-dose sequential nephron blockade or high-dose furosemide for 96 hours.
The primary end-point will be the bivariate change in body weight and serum creatinine value at 96 hours since randomization. Secondary endpoints will include clinical (e.g., total change in body weight during hospitalization, change in dyspnea score at 96 hours since randomization, 30-day readmission rate) and laboratory (e.g., change in BNP or NT-proBNP at discharge vs randomization) parameters, and safety (e.g., change in serum creatinine value at discharge versus randomization and up to 30 days from discharge) issues.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Sequential Nephron Blockade in Acute Heart Failure
NCT04163588
Effectiveness of a Diuretic Algorithm in Clinical Stability in Heart Failure Patients
NCT02068937
The Heart Failure Diuresis Efficacy Comparison (DEA-HF) Study
NCT05904808
Early Sequential Nephron Blockade in Acute Heart Failure Patients: A Randomised, Controlled Study
NCT04465123
Diuretic Treatment in Acute Heart Failure With Volume Overload Guided by Serial Spot Urine Sodium Assessment
NCT05411991
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
After 24-72 hours of algorithm-based treatment with high-dose intravenous furosemide, eligible patients will be randomized to either control (furosemide-only) or intervention (early sequential nephron blockade) arm.
All patients will be put on a low sodium diet (\< 70 mEq/24 hours), and will be allowed a fluid intake of \< 1 L/day.
Following randomization patients will be started on oral diuretic therapy according to two different approaches, namely:
1. High-dose oral furosemide-only arm A furosemide oral dose equivalent to twice the intravenous dose of the last 24 hours will be given in two daily divided doses.
Unless serum potassium value is higher than 5.0 mEq/L, oral spironolactone or potassium canrenoate will be added; dose will be established based on serum creatinine value Oral or intravenous potassium supplementation (potassium chloride at least 24 mEq/day) will be started if serum potassium value is lower than 4.0 mEq/L
2. Early sequential oral diuretic nephron blockade
1. Furosemide A furosemide oral dose equivalent to the previous 24-hour intravenous dose will be given in two divided doses
2. Metolazone. Dose will be established based on serum creatinine value
3. Acetazolamide. Dose will be established based on serum creatinine value
4. Spironolactone or Potassium Canrenoate. Unless serum potassium value is higher than 5.0 mEq/L, oral spironolactone or potassium canrenoate will be added; dose will be established based on serum creatinine value.
In both arms, if within the first 48 hours since randomization urine output is lower than 1.5 L/day and/or body weight decrease is less than 0.5 Kg/day, the oral dose of furosemide will be doubled, or the patient will be switched to intravenous administration at the discretion of the attending physician. If urinary output exceeds 50 ml/Kg/day current furosemide dose will be halved. Diuretics can be decreased or temporarily discontinued if there is a decrease in systolic blood pressure (\> 25% of basal value) or worsening kidney function (WKF, defined as an increase in serum creatinine value ≥ 0.3 mg/dL or 25% from baseline value within 24-48 hours) that is felt as being be due to a transient episode of intravascular volume depletion. After the patient has stabilized, if congestion persists, diuretics will be reinitiated or their doses will be increased until the patient's fluid balance has been optimized. Investigators may opt-out of the treatment algorithm if they feel that it is in the interest of patient care.
The primary endpoint will be the bivariate change in body weight and serum creatinine value at 96 hours since patient randomization.
According to the data from the study of Grodin et al (J Card Fail 2016; 22:26-32), comparing subjects randomized to stepped-care diuretic treatment in the Cardiorenal Rescue Study in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (CARRESS-HF) trial with those developing the cardiorenal syndrome during standard treatment with intravenous furosemide in the Diuretic Optimization Strategies Evaluation Acute Heart Failure (DOSE-AHF) trial and the Renal Optimization Strategies Evaluation in Acute Heart Failure (ROSE-AHF) trial, the mean difference in body weight obtained with the stepped-care oral approach versus the intravenous approach was -1.2 Kg, with a standard deviation (SD) ranging between 1.5 and 2.4 Kg; the mean difference in serum creatinine was -0.1 mg/dL, with a SD of 0.3 mg/dL. Thus, the investigators estimated that the enrollment of 206 patients would yield a 90% power to detect a 0.5 effect size for either component of the bivariate primary endpoint (1.2/2.4 Kg and 0.15/0.30 mg, respectively) with a two-sided 0.05 alpha level.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
The primary endpoint will be the bivariate change in body weight and serum creatinine value at 96 hours since patient randomization.
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard diuretic therapy (SDT)
Furosemide +/- spironolactone or potassium canrenoate
Standard diuretic therapy
The patients in this arm will be randomized to receiving oral furosemide in 2 daily divided doses at twice the intravenous dose administered during the past 24 hours. Unless serum potassium value is higher than 5 mmol/L, oral spironolactone or potassium canrenoate will be added; dose will be established based on serum creatinine value.
Early sequential nephron blockade (ESNB)
Furosemide + metolazone + acetazolamide +/- spironolactone or potassium canrenoate
Early sequential nephron blockade
After 24-72 hours of an algorithm-based treatment with high-dose intravenous furosemide started at the time of hospital admission, the patients in this arm will be randomized to receiving:
1. oral furosemide in 2 daily divided doses at a dose equivalent to that administered intravenously during the past 24 hours
2. metolazone at a dose based on serum creatinine value
3. acetazolamide at a dose based on serum creatinine value
4. spironolactone or potassium canrenoate (unless serum potassium value is higher than 5 mmol/L); dose will be established based on serum creatinine value
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Standard diuretic therapy
The patients in this arm will be randomized to receiving oral furosemide in 2 daily divided doses at twice the intravenous dose administered during the past 24 hours. Unless serum potassium value is higher than 5 mmol/L, oral spironolactone or potassium canrenoate will be added; dose will be established based on serum creatinine value.
Early sequential nephron blockade
After 24-72 hours of an algorithm-based treatment with high-dose intravenous furosemide started at the time of hospital admission, the patients in this arm will be randomized to receiving:
1. oral furosemide in 2 daily divided doses at a dose equivalent to that administered intravenously during the past 24 hours
2. metolazone at a dose based on serum creatinine value
3. acetazolamide at a dose based on serum creatinine value
4. spironolactone or potassium canrenoate (unless serum potassium value is higher than 5 mmol/L); dose will be established based on serum creatinine value
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients admitted to Cardiology or Internal Medicine units with a diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure and congestion: NT-proBNP \> 1,000 pg/ml or BNP \>250 pg/ml, dyspnea and at least two of the following clinical signs: 2+ pitting edema, pulmonary edema/pleural effusions at chest x-ray or US body weight increase above usual \> 5% over the last 4 weeks
* Clinically stable patients that can be switched to oral diuretic therapy after 24-72 hours of an algorithm-based treatment with high-dose intravenous furosemide started at the time of hospital admission
* Patients capable to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Systolic blood pressure \< 90 mmHg at time of enrollment and/or hemodynamic instability severe enough to require intravenous inotropes, intravenous vasodilators, or both
* Severe arrhythmias with hemodynamic instability or DC shock occurred prior to randomization
* Ascertained acute coronary syndrome (ACS), or ACS occurred within the last 4 weeks
* Hematocrit \> 45%
* Use of iodinated radio contrast material occurred in the last 72 hours
* Current mechanical ventilator support
* Previous solid organ transplant
* Primary hypertrophic or infiltrative cardiomyopathy, active myocarditis, constrictive pericarditis or cardiac tamponade, severe valvular stenosis
* Complex congenital heart disease
* Liver disease (serum ALT or AST \> 4, and/or total serum bilirubin \> 3)
* Known bilateral renal artery stenosis
* Active sepsis or ongoing systemic infection
* Active gastrointestinal tract bleeding
* Enrollment in another clinical trial
* Locally advanced or metastatic cancer
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma
OTHER
Azienda USL di Parma
UNKNOWN
Azienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCS
OTHER_GOV
University of Parma
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Enrico Fiaccadori
Associate Professor of Nephrology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Enrico Fiaccadori, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Universita degli Studi di Parma
Giuseppe Regolisti, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
UO Nefrologia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UO Nefrologia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma
Parma, PR, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SEEQUOIA-AHF
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.