Optimal Diuretic Therapies for Acute Heart Failure With Volume Overload

NCT ID: NCT06166654

Last Updated: 2025-02-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

939 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-09-05

Study Completion Date

2027-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Aim to identify the best strategy for treating acute heart failure (AHF) with volume overload, particularly focusing on patients resistant to standard loop-diuretics. The trial is a double-blinded, randomized, controlled, multicenter study. Its primary objective is to compare the efficacy of loop-diuretics combined with either Metolazone or Acetazolamide, against loop-diuretics alone. The trial will also determine the optimal type of loop-diuretic to use.

Eligible participants include adults over 18 years hospitalized with AHF and volume overload, showing signs of congestion and at risk of diuretic resistance. Exclusions apply to those with acute coronary syndrome, low systolic blood pressure, prior renal therapy, or previous treatment with Acetazolamide or Metolazone.

The primary outcome is the number of days alive and out-of-hospital by day 30. Secondary outcomes include a composite clinical benefit at 30 days, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) scores, and successful decongestion 72 hours post-inclusion.

The trial aims to enroll about 1,041,939 patients across three treatment arms over three years. The minimal important difference is set as a reduction in out-of-hospital days by at least two days, with an anticipated low dropout rate. The study's power is calculated to be 80% with an adjusted alpha level for comparing the three diuretic groups.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Trial synopsis Title: OPTIMAL DIURETIC THERAPIES FOR ACUTE HEART FAILURE WITH VOLUME OVERLOAD - A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

Background:

Intravenous loop-diuretics have been the key component in treating acute heart failure (AHF) since the nineteen sixties and has a Class 1 recommendation in the 2021 ESC guidelines for heart failure. Hospitalization for AHF with volume overload is the most frequent cause of hospital admission among elderly patients and is associated with poor outcome. There is a high need for additional decongestant therapies beyond the recommended use of intravenous loop diuretics.

Primary objective:

To determine the superior strategy of loop-diuretics + Metolazone, loop-diuretics + Acetazolamide, or loop-diuretics without additional diuretics during in-hospital treatment for acute decompensated heart failure with volume overload and diuretic resistance. Furthermore, to determine optimal type of loop-diuretic.

Hypothesis:

One of the three diuretic strategies are superior to the others for decongesting acute heart failure with volume overload.

Design: Investigator-initiated, double-blinded, randomized, controlled, multicenter, interventional clinical trial of acute decompensated heart failure patients at risk for diuretic resistanseresistance.

Intervention:

* Acetazolamide as add-on to loop-diuretics
* Metolazone as add-on to loop diuretics
* Usual care including guideline-recommended increase in loop-diuretic dose and fluid and salt-restriction.

Inclusion criteria:

1. Age ≥ 18 years
2. Acute hospital admission with a clinical diagnosis of acute heart failure with volume overload.
3. At risk of diuretic resistance
4. Clinical signs of congestion

Exclusion criteria:

1. Acute coronary syndrome
2. Systolic blood pressure \<85 mmHg
3. Use of renal replacement therapy or ultrafiltration in-hospital before study inclusion
4. Treatment with acetazolamide or metolazone during hospitalization prior to randomization

Primary outcome: Days alive out-of-hospital to day 30.

Secondary outcomes:

1. Clinical benefit at 30 days, consisting of a composite of 1. all-cause death, 2. Readmisison after discharge from initial hospitalization, 3. new receipt of renal-replacement therapy, or persistent renal dysfunction (defined as a final inpatient creatinine value ≥200% of the baseline value), assessed using a Hierarchical win-ratio' approach.
2. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) at 30 days
3. Successful decongestion 72 hours after inclusion (measured as the decongestion score ad modum Advor)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Heart Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

3-arm parallel group RCT
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
The study will employ a triple-blind design (Participants and relatives, investigators and clinicians, and data analysts and outcome adjudicators)

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Acetazolamide

1\. 500 mg IV bolus of acetazolamide at randomization (day 0) and repeated the next 3 mornings (day 1, day 2 and day 3). This arm will also receive a placebo- Metolazone tablet together with each acetazolamide-injection.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Acetazolamide

Intervention Type DRUG

1\. 500 mg IV bolus of acetazolamide at randomization (day 0) and repeated the next 3 mornings (day 1, day 2 and day 3). This arm will also receive a placebo- Metolazone tablet together with each acetazolamide-injection.

Metolazone

2.5 mg oral Metolazone at randomization (day 0) and repeated the next 3 mornings (day 1, day 2 and day 3). This arm will also receive a placebo- acetazolamide injection together with each metolazone-tablet.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Metolazone 2.5 MG

Intervention Type DRUG

2\. 2.5 mg oral Metolazone at randomization (day 0) and repeated the next 3 mornings (day 1, day 2 and day 3). This arm will also receive a placebo- acetazolamide injection together with each metolazone-tablet.

Placebo

Usual care with loop-diuretics as the sole diuretic (SGLT2-inhibitors allowed) including guideline-recommended increase in loop-diuretic dose and fluid and salt-restriction. This arm will also receive both a placebo-acetazolamide injection together with a placebo-metolazone-tablet at randomization and repeated the next 3 mornings (day 1, day 2 and day 3).

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Double-placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

This arm will also receive both a placebo-acetazolamide injection together with a placebo-metolazone-tablet at randomization and repeated the next 3 mornings (day 1, day 2 and day 3).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Acetazolamide

1\. 500 mg IV bolus of acetazolamide at randomization (day 0) and repeated the next 3 mornings (day 1, day 2 and day 3). This arm will also receive a placebo- Metolazone tablet together with each acetazolamide-injection.

Intervention Type DRUG

Metolazone 2.5 MG

2\. 2.5 mg oral Metolazone at randomization (day 0) and repeated the next 3 mornings (day 1, day 2 and day 3). This arm will also receive a placebo- acetazolamide injection together with each metolazone-tablet.

Intervention Type DRUG

Double-placebo

This arm will also receive both a placebo-acetazolamide injection together with a placebo-metolazone-tablet at randomization and repeated the next 3 mornings (day 1, day 2 and day 3).

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Standard of care including loop-diuretics Standard of care including loop-diuretics

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age ≥ 18 years
2. Acute hospital admission with a clinical diagnosis of acute heart failure with volume overload.
3. Display risk of diuretic resistance, characterized by:

1. Daily loop-diuretics administration for a minimum of 7 days before admission, or
2. Insufficient decongestion observed in the preceding 24 hours (weight reduction \<500g or negative fluid balance \<1L) despite being treated with high-dose IV loop diuretic (equivalent to ≥120 mg IV furosemide within 24 hours).
4. Clinical signs of congestion, indicated by one or more of the following: pitting peripheral edema, ascites, elevated jugular venous pressure, or radiological/ultrasonic evidence of pulmonary congestion.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Acute coronary syndrome
2. Systolic blood pressure \<85 mmHg
3. Use of renal replacement therapy or ultrafiltration in-hospital before study inclusion
4. Treatment with acetazolamide or metolazone during the index hospitalization prior to randomization
5. Known allergy to any of the used drugs
6. Severe hypokalemia (\<2.5 mmol/l) or severe hyponatremia (\<125 mmol/l)
7. Severe hepatic impairment or liver cirrhosis
8. Known pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Johannes Grand

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Johannes Grand

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Johannes Grand, MD, Phd, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Amager-Hvidovre Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Amager-Hvidovre Hospital

Hvidovre, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark

Site Status RECRUITING

Bispebjerg Hospital

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Herlev-Gentofte hospital

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Johannes Grand, MD, Phd, MPH

Role: CONTACT

+4535452121

Sandra Tonning, MD

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Johannes Grand, MD, PhD, MPH

Role: primary

+4535452121

Jens Jakob Thune, MD, PhD

Role: primary

38683767 ext. +45

Morten Schou, MD, PhD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DRAIN_AHF

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.