A Research Study to Understand and Predict the Failure of Shoulder Fracture Fixations Using Computer Simulations

NCT ID: NCT04056351

Last Updated: 2023-02-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

29 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-08-02

Study Completion Date

2022-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Fractures of the shoulder, the so-called proximal humeral fractures, can be treated with locking plates that have shown good results in clinical practice, but complications can occur. In order to further improve the treatment of proximal humerus fractures and decrease the rate of fixation failures, further research is necessary. As a first step, the reasons for potential implant failures need to be understood.

This study has been initiated by scientists at the AO Research Institute Davos (ARI), Switzerland, which is the research center of the AO Foundation (www.aofoundation.org), an international non-profit organization led by surgeons specialized in fractures such as these. Researchers at the ARI have been developing a computational simulation tool to predict fixation failure and demonstrated its efficiency in laboratory conditions. This clinical study has been organised to validate this tool using patient data, by comparing the risk of mechanical failure predicted by the computer simulated model with the clinically observed fixation failure. In future, this computer simulation tool is expected to help surgeons to select the best fixation for a given patient and to develop improved implants.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Older adult patients with complex, displaced and/or unstable proximal humerus fractures treated with the PHILOS plate (DePuy Synthes Inc.) will be recruited. Detailed patient background information will be assessed. Surgical details will be acquired. Pre-, intra- and post-OP imaging data will be collected in frame of the standard treatment protocol. A post-OP CT scan, which is performed only occasionally as standard of care, will be acquired for all patients participating in this study. The de-identified medical images will be transferred via secure file transfer protocol (FTP) to the sponsor. Patient activity will be recorded in the first 6 post-OP weeks by means of two wearable activity trackers attached on the skin of the treated upper arm and the chest. The tracker containing the encoded data will be shipped back to the sponsor.

According to the standard post-OP protocols, follow-up (FU) examinations will be performed at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after treatment. Additionally, another FU visit will be required at 3 weeks after surgery, where the activity trackers will be exchanged. FU radiographs during the standard of care visits will be compared with post-OP radiographs to determine if any mechanical failure has occurred.

Mechanical failure or no failure status of the fixation will be determined at 6 months following fracture treatment.

The patient-specific fixation failure risk will be prospectively predicted by means of computer simulations created from the pre-OP and post-OP CT images and surgical details. The prediction accuracy of the simulations will be evaluated by comparing the predicted failure risk with the clinically observed failure / no failure outcome. As a second approach, patient-specific shoulder activity (estimated based on patient pre-injury activity or measured directly post-operatively) will be incorporated into the simulations sequentially and its effect on the prediction accuracy will be evaluated.

The interventions in this study, i.e. the examinations that are beyond the current standard of care, will be i) the extra acquisition of the post-OP CT image in the cases that the treating surgeon is not requesting them, ii) the questionnaires on comorbidities and pre-injury activity, and grip strength measurements to estimate activity of the patient and iii) the post-OP activity measurement by means of wearable sensors.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Proximal Humeral Fracture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cohort of 50 enrolled patients

The following visits will be performed: direct post-OP, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after surgery. Surgical details will be assessed from the surgical notes. Medical images will be collected according to the standard of care. A post-OP CT scan will also be acquired when the treating surgeon requests it as per standard of care, or additionally, as a study specific imaging procedure for the rest of the participants. Patient activity will be estimated based on various factors, including questionnaires on demographics, activity level, comorbidity score and contralateral grip strength. The actual post-OP shoulder activity will be measured by motion tracking by means of sensors attached to upper arm of the treated side and on the chest for 6 weeks and by grip strength assessed at the treated arm at week 6. Fixation failure status will be determined 6 months post-OP. Imaging and details regarding the fixation failure event will be sent to ARI.

Group Type OTHER

Post-Operative (OP) Computer Tomography (CT)

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Post-OP CT of the treated shoulder

Questionnaires on patient activity and comorbidities

Intervention Type OTHER

* Shoulder activity scale (Marx)
* Parker Mobility Scale
* Barthel index
* Charlson Comorbidity Score

Grip strength measurement

Intervention Type OTHER

Grip strength will be measured using a CE marked hydraulic hand dynamometer device.

Non-invasive shoulder activity tracking usinig wearable sensors

Intervention Type OTHER

Post-OP activity will be assessed via wearable CE-marked accelerometer sensors.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Post-Operative (OP) Computer Tomography (CT)

Post-OP CT of the treated shoulder

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Questionnaires on patient activity and comorbidities

* Shoulder activity scale (Marx)
* Parker Mobility Scale
* Barthel index
* Charlson Comorbidity Score

Intervention Type OTHER

Grip strength measurement

Grip strength will be measured using a CE marked hydraulic hand dynamometer device.

Intervention Type OTHER

Non-invasive shoulder activity tracking usinig wearable sensors

Post-OP activity will be assessed via wearable CE-marked accelerometer sensors.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age≥ 50 years
* Radiologically confirmed closed fracture of the proximal humerus and treatment within 10 days after injury
* Any displaced or unstable 3- or 4-part fracture of the proximal humerus except isolated displaced fractures of the greater or lesser tuberosity
* Completed primary fracture treatment with a PHILOS plate with or without cement augmentation of the screws
* Ability to understand the content of the patient information / informed consent form
* Willingness and ability to participate in the clinical investigation including imaging, activity tracking and other FU procedures
* Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous proximal humerus fracture on the ipsilateral side
* Splitting fracture of the humeral head or humeral head impression fracture
* Fibula grafting, bone block or any other non-cement augmentation of the PHILOS plate fixation
* Any serious fracture fixation issue (serious malreduction, too long screw or screw perforating through the humeral head, broken screw or implant) that are recognized on the immediate post-OP x-rays, independently of being re-operated or not
* Associated nerve or vessel injury
* Any severe systemic disease: class 4 - 5 of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification
* Recent history of substance abuse (i.e., recreational drugs, alcohol) that would preclude reliable assessment
* Prisoner
* Participation in any other medical device or medicinal product study within the previous month that could influence the results of the present study
* Pregnancy
* Pacemaker
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AO Research Institute Davos

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Peter Varga, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

AO Research Institute Davos

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Medical University of Innsbruck

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

UZ Leuven

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria Belgium

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Varga P, Inzana JA, Gueorguiev B, Sudkamp NP, Windolf M. Validated computational framework for efficient systematic evaluation of osteoporotic fracture fixation in the proximal humerus. Med Eng Phys. 2018 Jul;57:29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2018.04.011. Epub 2018 May 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29728330 (View on PubMed)

Varga P, Grunwald L, Inzana JA, Windolf M. Fatigue failure of plated osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures is predicted by the strain around the proximal screws. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017 Nov;75:68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Jul 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28697401 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AR2018_01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

LPHP-Philos-PHN Conservative Treatment
NCT00205959 COMPLETED PHASE4
Non Randomized Humerusshaft Fracture
NCT00205972 COMPLETED PHASE4
Study on Outcomes of Proximal Humerus Fractures
NCT07060664 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA