Comparison of Two Analgesic Pretreatment Techniques Before Spinal Needle Insertion for Pain Reduction and Maternal Satisfaction Level Assessment in Women Undergoing LSCS.
NCT ID: NCT04050059
Last Updated: 2020-04-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
62 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-11-13
2019-12-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Local infiltration of lidocaine or any other anesthetic is used before lumber puncture in many centers to reduce needle stick pain.
EMLA (eutectic mixture of local anesthetic) cream is the combination of lidocaine and prilocaine which have been effectively used in few studies to reduce needle prick pain.
We would like to see which analgesic pretreatment is superior in terms of reducing pain of spinal needle insertion and have better maternal satisfaction levels.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Lidocaine-Prilocaine Cream (EMLA) Topical Application Versus Wound Infiltration With Lidocaine After Cesarean Section
NCT02549105
The Effect of Lidocaine - Prilocaine Cream (EMLA) Versus Mepivacaine Infiltration on Pain Relief During And After Mediolateral Episiotomies
NCT03264586
EMLA Cream in Hysteroscopy Practice
NCT02640183
EMLA Cream as Analgesic for Outpatient Gynecological Procedures
NCT05970354
Comparison of Infiltration of 2% Lidocaine With and Without Needle as Analgesia in Epidural Needle Insertion
NCT05326867
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Hypothesis: Analgesic pre-treatment with EMLA is superior to local skin infiltration with lidocaine
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
2% Lidocaine group
In 2% lidocaine group infiltration (Xylocaine 2% Barrett Hodgson Pakistan Pvt limited) skin and subcutaneous tissue will be infiltrated with 3 ml of 2% lidocaine (dose of 60 mg) before spinal anesthesia induction.
2% lidocaine
In 2% lidocaine group infiltration (Xylocaine 2% Barrett Hodgson Pakistan Pvt limited), skin and subcutaneous tissue will be infiltrated with 3 ml of 2% lidocaine (dose of 60 mg) before spinal needle insertion
EMLA cream group
In EMLA (Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthesia- lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5%) cream group, EMLA cream (5g tube Aspen pharma trading limited) will be applied topically in dose of 2.5 grams (half tube of cream) and area will be covered with tegaderm dressing. Application of EMLA will at least stay for 30 minutes before spinal needle insertion
EMLA cream
EMLA cream (5g tube Aspen pharma trading limited) will be applied topically in dose of 2.5 grams (half tube of cream) and area will be covered with tegaderm dressing. Application of EMLA will at least stay for 30 minutes before spinal needle insertion
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
EMLA cream
EMLA cream (5g tube Aspen pharma trading limited) will be applied topically in dose of 2.5 grams (half tube of cream) and area will be covered with tegaderm dressing. Application of EMLA will at least stay for 30 minutes before spinal needle insertion
2% lidocaine
In 2% lidocaine group infiltration (Xylocaine 2% Barrett Hodgson Pakistan Pvt limited), skin and subcutaneous tissue will be infiltrated with 3 ml of 2% lidocaine (dose of 60 mg) before spinal needle insertion
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Contraindication to spinal anesthesia
* Spinal deformity
* Refusal of regional anesthesia
* Patients with a history of back surgery
* confirmed allergy to local anesthetics
* More than three attempts of needle insertion for inducing spinal anesthesia
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aga Khan University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Malika Hameed
Fellow Obstetric Anesthesiology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Aga Khan University
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Koscielniak-Nielsen Z, Hesselbjerg L, Brushoj J, Jensen MB, Pedersen HS. EMLA patch for spinal puncture. A comparison of EMLA patch with lignocaine infiltration and placebo patch. Anaesthesia. 1998 Dec;53(12):1218-22. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00608.x.
Sharma SK, Gajraj NM, Sidawi JE, Lowe K. EMLA cream effectively reduces the pain of spinal needle insertion. Reg Anesth. 1996 Nov-Dec;21(6):561-4.
Wenk M, Massoth C, Weidlich S, Pöpping D M, Gurlit S, et al. Effects of local skin anaesthesia on pain during lumbar puncture. J Anaesthesiol Crit Care. 2017;1 (1):1-5
Juarez Gimenez JC, Oliveras M, Hidalgo E, Cabanas MJ, Barroso C, Moraga FA, Gallego S, de Toledo JS. Anesthetic efficacy of eutectic prilocaine-lidocaine cream in pediatric oncology patients undergoing lumbar puncture. Ann Pharmacother. 1996 Nov;30(11):1235-7. doi: 10.1177/106002809603001104.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2019-1791-4956
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.