Evaluation of the Written Information Delivered by the General Practitioner of the Patients Presenting to the Emergency Room for an Aggravation of Asthma
NCT ID: NCT04048746
Last Updated: 2020-10-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
10 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-07-24
2020-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The action plan must describe the actions to be taken by the patient in case of exacerbation of his asthma, to regain control. Regarding the format, it can be coupled to the prescription drug (action plan and prescription on the same prescription) or distinct from the prescription drug (a prescription for drugs and a prescription for the action plan). In some countries, "ready-to-use" action plans have been validated by learned societies, which is not the case today in France. In Canada, a study demonstrated in 2006 that 46% of asthmatic patients followed in hospital had an action plan, while the national average was estimated at about 10% in 2010. There is little data in France on the proportion of patients with asthma action plans.
Unlike the action plan, which is little distributed to the patient, the prescription drug for asthma is always given to the patient at the end of the consultation and specifies the procedures for taking treatments.
As part of this work, the investigators are interested in evaluating the written information given to the adult asthmatic patient by their general practitioner: the action plan but also the prescription medication.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Asthma Attack in the Emergency Department : Reasons Of This Attendance
NCT03099915
Evaluation of the Relapse Rate One Month After Discharge From Emergency Department for Asthmatic Patients Given a Strict Formalized Follow up Protocol
NCT02424409
Patient Education in Pregnant Women With Asthma
NCT05459012
Predictive Factors for Exacerbation Outcome in Severe Refractory Asthmatics
NCT00721097
Evaluation of the Frequency of Limitation of Activity in Patients With Persistent Asthma
NCT01078688
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ASTHMA
The patient presents to the emergency department for an aggravation of his asthma. The patient later sees an emergency investigator for medical care for his aggravation of asthma. When the patient's condition is stabilized, the investigator checks his eligibility for study and offers to participate. If the patient agrees, the investigator gives him the questionnaire and possibly helps to fill it out.
When the investigator returns to see the patient for a reassessment of his condition, he retrieves the completed questionnaire. He verifies that the patient has completed the questionnaire. Prescriptions and action plans are retrieved by the principal investigator either in digitized format from the patient's computerized medical record or in paper format. Each medication prescription and each action plan are read by the principal investigator and evaluated according to the grids.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Asthma patient
* Emergency Patient Counselor for GHPSJ for management of worsening asthma
* Patient followed for his asthma in town by a general practitioner
* Francophone patient
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient under tutorship or curatorship
* Patient deprived of liberty
* Patient under safeguard of justice
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sergio Salmeron, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph
Paris, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ASTHMAVILLE
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.