Treating Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA) Using High-definition tDCS

NCT ID: NCT04046991

Last Updated: 2025-10-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

76 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-08-17

Study Completion Date

2025-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover study in which subjects with the non-fluent/agrammatic and logopenic variants of primary progressive aphasia (naPPA and lvPPA, respectively) will undergo language testing and structural and functional brain imaging before and after receiving 10 semi-consecutive daily sessions of real or sham high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) paired with modified constraint-induced language therapy (mCILT). Language testing and brain imaging will be repeated immediately after completion of and 3 months following completion of treatment. The 3-month follow-up will be the primary endpoint. The investigators will examine changes in language performance induced by HD-tDCS + mCILT compared to sham HD-tDCS + mCILT. The investigators will also use network science to analyze brain imaging (fMRI) data to identify network properties associated with baseline PPA severity and tDCS-induced changes in performance. This study will combine knowledge gained from our behavioral, imaging, and network data in order to determine the relative degrees to which these properties predict whether persons with PPA will respond to intervention.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The central framework for the project is a double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover study in which subjects with the non-fluent/agrammatic and logopenic variants of primary progressive aphasia (naPPA and lvPPA, respectively) will undergo language testing and structural and functional brain imaging before and after receiving 10 semi-consecutive daily sessions of real or sham high definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) paired with modified constraint-induced language therapy (mCILT). Language testing and brain imaging will be repeated immediately after completion of and 3 months following completion of treatment.

Subjects with naPPA and lvPPA will be randomized to one of two study arms: HD-tDCS+mCILT or sham stimulation+mCILT paired with pre- and post-stimulation imaging and behavioral measures. Equal numbers of subjects with naPPA and lvPPA will be randomized to the HD-tDCS + mCILT and sham + mCILT study arms. The study is double-blinded, in that neither the subject nor the study personnel administering HD-tDCS or sham stimulation will know which arm of the study the subject has been randomized into. Study coordinators will administer HD-tDCS by entering a pre-determined code that has been programmed into the device by another member of the study team. Data will be digitally audio-recorded and analyzed off-line, such that study team members performing data coding and analysis will likewise be blinded to the treatment condition of each subject.

Subject participation in this protocol will occur during 27 planned visits that will span approximately 8 months. The events of the study visits are described below:

VISIT 1:

a Informed consent and screening b. Baseline language assessment #1 c. Baseline MRI scanning

VISIT 2:

Baseline language assessment #2

VISITS 3-11:

HD-tDCS+mCILT OR sham stimulation+mCILT, depending on the study arm to which they had been randomized.

VISIT 12:

1. Final session of HD-tDCS+mCILT or sham stimulation+mCILT
2. Follow-up language assessment
3. Follow-up MRI

VISIT 13:

6-Week follow-up language assessment

VISIT 14:

1. 12-week follow-up language assessment
2. 12-week follow-up MRI

\*\*CROSSOVER\*\*

VISIT 15:

Crossover baseline language assessment #2

VISITS 16-24:

HD-tDCS+mCILT or sham stimulation+mCILT

VISIT 25:

1. 10th session of HD-tDCS+mCILT or sham stimulation+mCILT
2. Follow-up language assessment
3. Follow-up MRI

VISIT 26:

6 Week follow-up language assessment:

VISIT 27:

1. 12-week follow-up language assessment
2. 12-week follow-up MRI

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Primary Progressive Aphasia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

HD-tDCS+mCILT

Participants will undergo 10 daily sessions (Monday-Friday, x2 weeks) of HD-tDCS for 20 minutes using a montage in which a central electrode (1.5mA) is placed over the left frontotemporal area and four surrounding cathodes (.375mA each). Subjects will participate in a modified constraint-induced language therapy.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

High definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) involves the application of low-intensity current through electrodes placed on the scalp. It is believed to elicit brain effects by producing incremental shifts in the resting membrane potential of large numbers of neurons, which alters neuronal firing rates and thus modulates patterns of brain activity in potentially behaviorally-relevant ways. HD-tDCS differs from conventional transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) because it employed smaller electrodes configured in such a way as to deliver more focal stimulation of the brain.

modified constraint-induced language therapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Modified constraint-induced language therapy (mCILT) is a behavioral language therapy that invokes use-dependent learning in communicative interactions by requiring spoken output and restricting use of alternative forms of communication, such as gestures, as a substitute for spoken output. Other key elements of CILT include massed practice of goal-directed speech and shaping of desired responses by increasing response demands as participants improve. MCILT differs from traditional constraint-induced language therapy (CILT) in three ways: 1) it will be done as an individual therapy with the examiner in the role of a communication partner; 2) treatment will be delivered in short sessions (1 hour rather than a more typical 3-4 hour session); 3) targeting nouns + semantically related verbs to generate noun + verb phrases in treatment, a modification that may be better suited to addressing syntactic structure.

Sham+mCILT

Participants will undergo 10 daily sessions (Monday-Friday, x2 weeks) of sham for 20 minutes using a montage in which a central electrode is placed over the left frontotemporal area and four surrounding cathodes. Subjects will participate in a modified constraint-induced language therapy,

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

High definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) involves the application of low-intensity current through electrodes placed on the scalp. It is believed to elicit brain effects by producing incremental shifts in the resting membrane potential of large numbers of neurons, which alters neuronal firing rates and thus modulates patterns of brain activity in potentially behaviorally-relevant ways. HD-tDCS differs from conventional transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) because it employed smaller electrodes configured in such a way as to deliver more focal stimulation of the brain.

modified constraint-induced language therapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Modified constraint-induced language therapy (mCILT) is a behavioral language therapy that invokes use-dependent learning in communicative interactions by requiring spoken output and restricting use of alternative forms of communication, such as gestures, as a substitute for spoken output. Other key elements of CILT include massed practice of goal-directed speech and shaping of desired responses by increasing response demands as participants improve. MCILT differs from traditional constraint-induced language therapy (CILT) in three ways: 1) it will be done as an individual therapy with the examiner in the role of a communication partner; 2) treatment will be delivered in short sessions (1 hour rather than a more typical 3-4 hour session); 3) targeting nouns + semantically related verbs to generate noun + verb phrases in treatment, a modification that may be better suited to addressing syntactic structure.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation

High definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) involves the application of low-intensity current through electrodes placed on the scalp. It is believed to elicit brain effects by producing incremental shifts in the resting membrane potential of large numbers of neurons, which alters neuronal firing rates and thus modulates patterns of brain activity in potentially behaviorally-relevant ways. HD-tDCS differs from conventional transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) because it employed smaller electrodes configured in such a way as to deliver more focal stimulation of the brain.

Intervention Type DEVICE

modified constraint-induced language therapy

Modified constraint-induced language therapy (mCILT) is a behavioral language therapy that invokes use-dependent learning in communicative interactions by requiring spoken output and restricting use of alternative forms of communication, such as gestures, as a substitute for spoken output. Other key elements of CILT include massed practice of goal-directed speech and shaping of desired responses by increasing response demands as participants improve. MCILT differs from traditional constraint-induced language therapy (CILT) in three ways: 1) it will be done as an individual therapy with the examiner in the role of a communication partner; 2) treatment will be delivered in short sessions (1 hour rather than a more typical 3-4 hour session); 3) targeting nouns + semantically related verbs to generate noun + verb phrases in treatment, a modification that may be better suited to addressing syntactic structure.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Presence of aphasia attributable to nonfluent agrammatic PPA (naPPA) or logopenic variant PPA (lvPPA)
2. High school education (or more)
3. Must be able to understand the nature of the study, and give informed consent
4. Native English speaker

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of additional neurological illness such as stroke or traumatic brain injury
* Diagnosis of epilepsy or reoccurening seizures
* Pacemaker or ICDs
* Craniotomy or skull breech
* Small vessel disease
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Pennsylvania

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Roy H Hamilton, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Pennsylvania

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

834650

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

tDCS for Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment
NCT06516588 RECRUITING PHASE2
Cognitive Stimulation Study
NCT02067689 COMPLETED NA