Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
175 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-03-01
2020-02-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The project consists of two phases: First, a before-after study comprising two sequential but independent cohort studies will be conducted to compare the outcomes and cost-effectiveness of current practice with the SPLIT stratified model of care. Second, an implementation strategy will be developed based on the results of a survey regarding determinants of current practice, and two focus groups concerning the barriers and facilitators for the implementation of the SPLIT stratified model of care.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Low Back Pain - What's Next? Stratified Care Compared to Current Practice
NCT02612467
MyBack - A Behavior Change Informed Exercise Program to Prevent Low Back Pain Recurrences
NCT05841732
Implementation of the STarT Back Screening Tool
NCT03671278
Chronic Low Back Pain and Neck Pain Prospective Study
NCT04883476
Markers of Outcome - a Cohort Study of LBP in Primary Health Care
NCT03108339
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Recruitment and data collection procedures will be identical for both cohorts. Participants will be eligible if they consult one of the participating General Practitioner practices (GA) due to non-specific Low Back Pain (LBP), with or without leg pain (The International Classification for Primary Care-2 diagnostic codes L03, L84, and L86), if they are aged between 18 and 65 years and able to read and speak the Portuguese language. They will be excluded if they have clinical signs of infection, tumor, osteoporosis, fracture, structural deformity, inflammatory disorder, radicular syndrome, or cauda equine syndrome, if they have severe depression or other psychiatric condition, if they are pregnant, or if they have undergone back surgery or conservative treatment in the prior 6 and 3 months, respectively.
Patients will be recruited by their GP, who will briefly explain the study and obtain consent to pass the contact details to a research assistant (RA). The RA will inform the patients about the study and ask them if they are willing to participate and to be contacted for follow-up questionnaires (by phone), and whether they give permission for their LBP medical records to be reviewed. Patients who decline referral will not be eligible for the study and will follow the usual clinical care.
On the initial screening with the RA, eligible LBP patients who consent to participate in the study will fill a questionnaire booklet containing socio-demographic and clinical questions, the Start Back Screening Tool, and patient reported outcomes concerning back-related disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire), pain intensity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale), and health related quality of life (EuroQuol, five dimensions, 3 levels). These outcomes will be reassessed at 2 and 6 months following the first medical consultation. A Global Perceived Effect Scale (GPES) to assess patient overall perception of improvement with treatment will be added in the follow-up reassessments.
In both cohorts no specific instruction will be given to GPs concerning their practice. They will be encouraged to assess and treat their patients as usually and make all the referrals they think are appropriate for their patients. At the end of each cohort the GPs medical records will be reviewed and data concerning the number of primary care consultations, prescribed medications, ordering of diagnostic tests, referrals to other professionals or services will be extracted.
The primary outcome is back-related disability measured by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). This questionnaire consists of 24 items related to activities of daily living and was developed to measure self-rated disability due to LBP. Each answer can be scored "0" or "1," thus leaving a range of scores from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating higher disability. The RMDQ has shown good reliability, construct validity and responsiveness in studies with LBP patients. Secondary outcomes include pain, health related quality of life (HRQoL), and patients' perception of overall change of their back condition. Pain intensity will be measured by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). This is an 11-point self-report measure (0 to 10) with the labels "no pain" and "worst imaginable pain" on the ends, that has proven to be valid and reliable with patients with musculoskeletal pain. The EuroQuol, five dimensions, 3 levels (EQ-5D-3L) is a generic measuring instrument developed to assess HRQoL. The weight applied to the states is based on the Portuguese valuation study of the EQ-5D-3L. GPES is a transition scale designed to assess the patients' perception of overall change in their back condition. All patient reported measures are cross-culturally validated into European Portuguese Language showing adequate psychometric properties.
Two criteria will be used to interpret the response to treatment: 1) the Minimal Clinically Important Difference established for the RMDQ and NPRS (reduction of ≥30% from baseline); the definition of persisting LBP disability (RMDQ score \>7) at 2 and 6 months.
In parallel with the data collection of the first cohort, an implementation plan will be developed. Determinants of practice (change) will be identified through the results of a survey about the GPs and Physical Therapists (PTs) attitudes, beliefs and confidence in managing LBP patients, and their adherence to clinical guidelines. Behavioural change strategies will be selected and implemented. Based on the published results of the current practice in primary care, and on the effectiveness of knowledge transfer strategies in similar studies, it is very likely that the intervention program will include different strategies such as patient-mediated interventions, educational meetings and key practice enablers (e.g. a web platform with information for patients, mentoring program, audit and feedback) targeted to GPs, PTs and patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Usual Care
All patients were referred for the study by their General Practitioner (GP). GPs were encouraged to assess and treat their patients as usual and make all the referrals they think are appropriate for their patients.
Usual Care
Pain Medication, imaging, referrals to other health services, other health care appointments
Stratified Model of Care
A subgrouping tool helps guide clinical decision-making about treatment and onward referral (Start Back Screening Tool). Patients in each subgroup (low, medium or high risk of chronicity) are then managed according to a targeted treatment system of increasing complexity.
SPLIT Stratified Model of Care
Physiotherapy targeted treatment system of increasing complexity for each subgroup (low, medium or high) of risk of chronicity. Includes patient education, manual therapy and exercise
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Usual Care
Pain Medication, imaging, referrals to other health services, other health care appointments
SPLIT Stratified Model of Care
Physiotherapy targeted treatment system of increasing complexity for each subgroup (low, medium or high) of risk of chronicity. Includes patient education, manual therapy and exercise
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age between 18 and 65 years;
* Able to read and speak the Portuguese language.
Exclusion Criteria
* Clinical signs of tumor;
* Clinical signs of osteoporosis;
* Clinical signs of fracture;
* Clinical signs of structural deformity;
* Clinical signs of inflammatory disorder;
* Clinical signs of radicular syndrome;
* Clinical signs of cauda equine syndrome;
* Clinical signs of severe depression or other psychiatric condition;
* Pregnant women;
* Patients that undergone a back surgery in the prior 6 months;
* Patients that received any type of conservative treatment in the prior 3 months.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universidade Nova de Lisboa
OTHER
Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Eduardo B. Cruz
Principal Investigator Eduardo José Brazete Carvalho Cruz
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Helena Canhão, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Epidoc Unit- Nova Medical School. Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal
Setúbal, , Portugal
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cruz EB, Canhao H, Fernandes R, Caeiro C, Branco JC, Rodrigues AM, Pimentel-Santos F, Gomes LA, Paiva S, Pinto I, Moniz R, Nunes C. Prognostic indicators for poor outcomes in low back pain patients consulted in primary care. PLoS One. 2020 Mar 27;15(3):e0229265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229265. eCollection 2020.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SAICT-POL/23439
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.