Weight Loss Physical Disabilities

NCT ID: NCT04046471

Last Updated: 2025-08-05

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

129 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-02-01

Study Completion Date

2024-06-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this study is to compare weight loss (6 mos.) and maintenance (18 mos.) between an individual home visit intervention (IH) and an intervention delivered remotely via video conferencing to groups of overweight/obese adults with Mobility Related Disabilities (MRDs) in their homes (GR). The primary aim will be to compare weight loss (0-6 mos.) between the two interventions (IH vs. GR). Secondarily, the study team will compare the mean weight loss from 0-18 mos., the proportion of participants achieving \>=5% weight loss from baseline, changes in cardiovascular risk factors and quality of life, and conduct a cost analysis. In addition, factors that will be explored include the influence of behavioral session attendance, compliance with the recommendations for diet (energy intake, number of entrees/shakes, servings of fruits/vegetables), Physical Activity (PA, min of moderate vigorous PA, min sedentary time), and self-monitoring of diet and PA, self-efficacy for dietary change and PA, dietary self-regulation, social support for diet/PA, barriers to PA, sleep and medications on weight loss at 6 and 18 mos.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators propose a 2-arm randomized trial (group remote (GR) vs. individual home visit (IH)) using intent-to-treat principles, to compare body weight following weight loss (6 mos.) and maintenance (18 mos.) in overweight/obese adults with Mobility Related Disabilities (MRDs). Adults with MRDs (n=128) will be randomized (1:1) to one of the 2 intervention arms for an 18-mo. trial (6 mos. weight loss, 12 mos. maintenance). Cohorts of \~30-45 individuals will be recruited. Following baseline testing, participants will be stratified by their primary mode of locomotion outside the home, i.e., ambulatory or assistive device (wheelchair, scooter, etc.), and randomized with equal allocation to GR or IH arms. Both interventions will be delivered in a format that eliminates the transportation barrier, prescribed an enhanced stop light diet, and will self-monitor body weight using electronic scales. The GR arm will include group behavioral counseling and group PA delivered remotely via video conferencing (Zoom trademark software) on a tablet computer (iPad mini) to participants in their homes, and use commercially available web-based applications for self-monitoring/participant feedback for diet (Lose It! software) and PA (Fitbit activity tracker). The IH arm will include behavioral counseling delivered during individual home visits, a prescription for self-directed PA, and self-monitoring of diet and PA using conventional paper and pencil self-reports. All outcomes will be collected by trained research assistants who are blinded to the study condition. The primary aim will be to compare weight loss (0-6 mos.) between the GR and IH interventions. Secondarily, the research team will compare mean weight loss from 0-18 mos., the proportion of participants achieving \>=5% weight loss from baseline, changes in cardiovascular risk factors and quality of life, and conduct a cost analysis. In addition, the influence of behavioral session attendance, compliance with the recommendations for diet (energy intake, number of entrees/shakes, servings of fruits/vegetables), PA (min of moderate-vigorous PA, min sedentary time), and self-monitoring of diet and PA, self-efficacy for dietary change and PA, dietary self-regulation, social support for diet/PA, barriers to PA, sleep, and medications on weight loss between the IH and GR arms will be explored, with 80% power and a type 1 error rate of 0.05, assuming a common standard deviation of 6 kg, will require 64 participants/group. A 2-sample independent t-test will be used to compare 6 mo. weight loss (primary aim) between the 2 intervention arms in both an intent-to-treat and completer only analysis. For the secondary aim 1, comparison of 18 mo. weight loss, will mirror the analysis for the primary aim. A 2-sample t-test will be used to compare weight change (0-18 mos.) between the 2 intervention arms. For secondary aim 2, a between arm comparison of the proportion of participants achieving \>=5% weight loss (0-18 mos.) will be evaluated using a chi-square test. Secondary aims 3 and 4, between arm comparison of change in risk factors and quality of life (0-6 and 0-18 mos.), will be evaluated using a 2-sample ttest. Exploratory aims will examine the influence of the following on weight loss at 6 mos.: behavioral session attendance; compliance with the recommendations for diet (energy intake, number of entrees/shakes, servings of fruits/vegetables), PA (min of moderate-vigorous PA, min sedentary time), self-monitoring of diet and PA, sleep, and medications assessed over the time period of interest i.e. (0-6 and 0-18 mos.); and the changes in self-efficacy for PA and dietary change, dietary self-regulation, social support for diet/PA, and barriers to PA from 0-6 mos. The influence of these factors as covariates will be examined, in addition to treatment, on weight loss at 6 mos. This will allow the ability to identify which variables most highly influence the outcome along with treatment and/or the mechanism(s) of action that are impacting weight loss.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Physical Disability

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Individual In-Person

Group Type OTHER

enhanced Stop Light Diet

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Stop light diet enhanced with portion-controlled meals

Individual In-Person

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will receive a weight loss intervention during individual, at-home visits.

Group Remote

Group Type OTHER

enhanced Stop Light Diet

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Stop light diet enhanced with portion-controlled meals

Group Remote

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will receive remotely delivered weight loss in a group setting.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

enhanced Stop Light Diet

Stop light diet enhanced with portion-controlled meals

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Group Remote

Participants will receive remotely delivered weight loss in a group setting.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Individual In-Person

Participants will receive a weight loss intervention during individual, at-home visits.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* A permanent MRD (\>= 1 yr. duration) requiring the use of a wheelchair or resulting in the inability to walk 0.25 miles without stopping, with or without assistive devices, as documented by 7 items from the NHANES Physical Funding Survey (113), and confirmed by the Primary Care Physician (PCP). Individuals with MRDs, associated with, but not limited to spinal cord injury (SCI), spina bifida, multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, stroke, muscular dystrophy, and lower limb amputation will be included.
* Age 18 yrs and above. Weight management for younger individuals requires different behavioral strategies.
* Body mass index (BMI) above 25 kg/m squared. Individuals with BMI, with a BMI \<25kg/m squared are not overweight. We are aware of the difficulty in the assessment of BMI, and issues related to the use of BMI for classifying overweight/obesity in individuals with SCI or amputations. Thus, in questionable cases we will defer to the PCP regarding eligibility based on weight status.
* Wireless internet access in the home.

Exclusion Criteria

* Unable to participate in light-to-moderate intensity PA, e.g., seated aerobics, resistance exercise, or physically unable to use the iPad.
* Participation in a structured weight loss or exercise program in the previous 6 mos. These proximal exercises may influence this trial.
* Not weight stable (plus/minus 4.6 kg) for 3 mos. prior to intake.
* Unwilling to be randomized.
* Pregnancy during the previous 6 mos. currently lactating, or planned pregnancy in the following 18 mos.
* Serious medical risk, e.g., cancer, recent heart attack, stroke as determined by the PCP.
* Current use of antipsychotics, untreated depression, or other psychiatric illness that would preclude participation in weight management, as determined by the PCP. Psychiatric co-morbidity may limit the benefits from health education. Addressing psychiatric issues is beyond the scope of this study.
* Cognitive, visual, or hearing impairments that may interfere with compliance to the study protocol as determined by the PCP.
* Adherence to specialized diets, e.g., food allergies, vegetarian, macrobiotic.
* Binge (Binge Eating Scale) or other eating disorders (EATs-26).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Kansas Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Joseph Donnelly, EdD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Kansas Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Kansas Medical Center

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Washburn RA, Ptomey LT, Gorczyca AM, Smith PR, Mayo MS, Lee R, Donnelly JE. Weight management for adults with mobility related disabilities: Rationale and design for an 18-month randomized trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Sep;96:106098. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106098. Epub 2020 Aug 6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32768682 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R01DK116669-01A1

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

142753

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.