Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-01-22
2025-05-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prospective Evaluation of Residual Bile Duct Stone by Peroral Cholangioscopy After Conventional ERCP
NCT03482375
Optimizing the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Suspected Choledocholithiasis
NCT05141916
Gallbladder Cryoablation in High-Risk Patients
NCT04915651
Is Needle Knife Fistulotomy An Effective First Step Strategy For All ERCPs?
NCT03698266
RCT on Necessity of Cholecystectomy for Patients After Clearance of Bile Duct Stones
NCT03577873
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Recent studies suggest that early surgery may be associated with better outcomes, but practice remains variable, ranging anywhere from early surgery (\<7 days) to delayed surgery (\>7 days). Among \>24,000 Ontarians with AC admitted to 106 hospitals, timing of cholecystectomy varied widely across sites. Only 58% of patients underwent surgery within 7 days. High volume hospitals were more likely to perform early surgery.17
Among 14,200 Ontarians with AC, a propensity score analysis demonstrated that early surgery was associated with less bile duct injury (relative risk (RR)=0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.90) and shorter length of hospital stay (LOS) (mean 1.9 days, 95% CI 1.7-2.1). Early surgery was less costly and more effective than delayed cholecystectomy.
Trials of surgical timing in patients with AC are limited. The largest randomized controlled trial (RCT) compared early and delayed surgery for AC only included 618 patients.9 Cholecystectomy was performed a median of 1 day after randomization in the early group compared to a median of 25 days in the delayed group. Duration of surgery and conversion rate to open surgery were similar in both groups. Early surgery was associated with less morbidity (11.8% vs. 34.4%, p\<0.001), shorter LOS (5.4 vs. 10.0 days, p\<0.001), and lower cost (€2919 vs. €4262, p\<0.001).
Multiple meta-analyses have suggested that early surgery for AC is associated with fewer wound infections (RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.35-0.93) and have suggested a trend to fewer complications (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.42-1.03). Limitations of these meta-analyses include studies with small sample sizes, few events, wide confidence intervals, and variation in the definition of early surgery. Finally, there is a lack of strong evidence to make definitive conclusions regarding impact of early surgery in AC, which has led to substantial variation in clinical practice.
AC initiates inflammatory, hypercoagulable, and stress states that can cause medical complications. Early surgical treatment will reduce the time patients are exposed to these harmful states and therefore may reduce the risk of complications. Furthermore, rapid surgery results in a shorter period of AC, which may impact hospital costs. The goal is to undertake a large multicentre RCT of the impact of accelerated surgery (goal within 6 hours of diagnosis) vs. usual timing of surgery in patients with AC on a composite outcome of major clinical and surgical complications at 90 days. "Standard of care", as described, is highly variable and depends on the surgeon and hospital practice patterns.
The main objective of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility of a large trial. The team hypothesizes that accelerated surgery for AC will improve clinical and surgical outcomes. A large RCT on this topic is needed for the following reasons: 1) time to surgery is a modifiable factor; 2) available data are encouraging, but not definitive; 3) there is variation in clinical practice across Ontario and internationally 4) the definition of early surgery has varied substantially across studies; 5) available data may be substantially underestimating the effect of timing of surgery because no trial has evaluated surgery within 6 hours of diagnosis; 6) high-quality evidence will modify clinical practice; and 7) implementation of accelerated surgery could save millions of healthcare dollars annually.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard of Care
Patients randomized to the standard of care arm of the trial will not receive accelerated cholecystectomy surgery to correct cholecystitis. No services will be taken away but patients will continue with care as originally provided by the healthcare system.
No interventions assigned to this group
FAST Intervention
Patients diagnosed with cholecystitis and randomized to the FAST intervention arm of the study will undergo surgery as soon as possible with a goal of surgery within 6 hours of diagnosis.
cholecystectomy
If patients are randomized to the intervention arm of the study; said patient will undergo corrective cholecystectomy surgery to correct cholecystitis as soon as possible with a goal of surgery within 6 hours of diagnosis.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
cholecystectomy
If patients are randomized to the intervention arm of the study; said patient will undergo corrective cholecystectomy surgery to correct cholecystitis as soon as possible with a goal of surgery within 6 hours of diagnosis.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Diagnosis of acute cholecystitis defined by the presence of at least 2 of the following:
1. Abdominal pain in upper right quadrant,
2. Murphy's sign,
3. Leukocytosis \>10 × 103/μl, or
4. Oral temperature \<36.5°C or \>38°C;
3. Cholelithiasis (stones/sludge);
4. Ultrasound signs of cholecystitis;
5. Acute cholecystitis that requires surgery and is diagnosed during working hours;
6. Expected to require at least an overnight hospital admission after surgery; and
7. Provide written informed consent to participate in FAST.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients whose therapeutic anticoagulation is not reversible;
3. Patients with a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and current use of warfarin with an INR ≥1.5;
4. Pregnant patients;
5. Previous participation in the trial.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
St. Joseph's Health Care London
OTHER
P.J. Devereaux
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
P.J. Devereaux
PHRI Perioperative and Digital Health Research Director
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Flavia Kessler Borges PhD, M.D
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Population Health Research Institute
Rahima Nenshi Msc, M.D
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
St. Joseph's Health Care London
PJ Devereaux PhD, M.D
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hamilton General Hospital
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Juravinski Hospital
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
St. Joseph's Healthcare
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Lawson Health Research Institute, London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Borges FK, Nenshi R, Serrano PE, Engels P, Vogt K, Park LJ, Di Sante E, Vincent J, Tsiplova K, Devereaux PJ. Fast Track Pathway to Accelerated Cholecystectomy Versus Standard of Care for Acute Cholecystitis (FAST) pilot trial. Can J Surg. 2025 Apr 11;68(2):E122-E131. doi: 10.1503/cjs.016423. Print 2025 Mar-Apr.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FAST Pilot
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.