Peer to Peer Programs for Military Suicide Prevention

NCT ID: NCT04021758

Last Updated: 2022-10-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

2055 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-01-01

Study Completion Date

2022-03-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In the present project the investigators propose to test the efficacy of a peer to peer program entitled Airman's Edge. The Airman's Edge program plans to utilize peer mentors that will be trained in specialized skills designed to impact suicide risk at multiple levels of the military community without creating "extra duties" that increase workload and interfere with mission demands. Peer mentors will introduce primary prevention strategies to their units that target broad-based risk factors across the entire population (i.e., sleep disturbance, social support, meaning in life, firearm safety) with secondary prevention strategies that target individual-level risk factors (i.e., crisis response planning, firearm safety counseling). Peer mentors will complete a structured training process using existing curriculum and procedures that have been tested and refined within military groups. Peers mentors will also participate in monthly consultation calls with the investigative team to receive ongoing support, share resources and lessons learned, and address challenges and barriers to program implementation.

The purpose of the Airman's Edge peer to peer program is to influence indicators of suicide risk among military personnel at two levels, group and individual, consistent with the program's hybrid design that combines group-based education and individual-level suicide prevention skills training. The hypotheses are therefore designed to examine outcomes and effects at multiple levels of the community, which could inform subsequent implementation and translational efforts. The following aims are proposed:

Aim 1: To test the efficacy of a peer to peer program for the reduction of suicidal behavior among military personnel.

Aim 2: To identify moderators and mediators of the peer to peer program's effects on suicidal behavior.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Suicides among military personnel doubled from 2001 to 2015 and have remained elevated. Although new treatments and interventions have been shown to reduce the occurrence of suicidal behavior, they are predominantly available only in mental health clinics. Data indicates that the large majority of military personnel who die by suicide do not access mental healthcare services in the months preceding their deaths. New strategies that are based on these empirically-supported interventions but can be delivered outside the mental healthcare system, thereby reaching a larger proportion of the military community, are therefore needed. Peer to peer (P2P) support programs hold promise as a method for achieving these aims, but the evidence supporting this intervention model remains limited or, in the case of suicide prevention, absent. In light of this gap, the proposed project aims to test the efficacy of a P2P program for the reduction of suicidal behaviors among military personnel. The proposed P2P program, called Airman's Edge, is a hybrid model that includes both group-based peer educator and individual-based peer support components; these P2P program models have demonstrated the strongest outcomes with respect to changing attitudes, perspectives, and behaviors, all of which are key targets for reducing suicidal thoughts and behaviors. The Airman's Edge program is comprised of several skills-based strategies that have been shown to directly reduce suicidal thoughts and behaviors (i.e., sleep habits, firearm safety procedures, crisis response planning), and targets population-level contextual variables known to reduce suicide risk (i.e., purpose and meaning in life, social support). The mechanisms by which these strategies reduce suicidal behavior align with an empirically-supported conceptual model, the suicidal mode, which has guided recent advances in military suicide prevention. The delivery platform for the skills-based strategies employed in the Airman's Edge program have demonstrated very good acceptability and feasibility when used with military personnel.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Suicide

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The study design entails a dynamic wait list design in which participants are randomly assigned to either the Peer-to-Peer (P2P) program or a wait list control condition. Randomization will be conducted at the squadron level using a computerized randomization algorithm.

The proposed dynamic wait list design differs primarily from the traditional wait list designs with respect to timing of intervention. In the traditional wait list design, half of the squadrons (i.e., N/2) would be randomized to implement the P2P program early in the study and the remaining half would implement the P2P program later in the study. By contrast, the dynamic wait list randomizes the timing of the intervention over the entire course of the study period by first dividing the overall study period into m equal time blocks, and then randomizing N/m squadrons to receive the P2P program during each time block.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Data analyses will be conducted by a quantitative psychology postdoctoral fellow under the supervision of Dr. Brian Baucom, PhD, at The University of Utah, and Kent Corso, PsyD, BCBA-D, at Xcelerate Innovations. Dr. Baucom serves on the University of Utah's Department of Psychology's Statistical Consulting Service, and has prior experience with clinical trial methodology and military research. Dr. Corso is a certified behavior analyst with extensive experience using single case design methodology and applying this approach to military settings. None of the data analysts will be involved in data collection procedures, and will remain therefore blind to treatment assignment. Prior to statistical analyses, data will be screened to identify distributional properties.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Peer to peer program intervention

The experimental condition for the proposed project is the Airman's Edge program, a peer to peer program in which peer mentors will be trained to provide a series of interventions aimed at reducing risk for suicidal behaviors both directly and indirectly through the targeting of emotion dysregulation, cognitive rigidity, and contextual risk factors (e.g., insomnia, meaning in life, social support, firearm availability).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Peer to peer program intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Peer to peer suicide prevention program aimed at reducing suicide in a military population.

Wait list

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Peer to peer program intervention

Peer to peer suicide prevention program aimed at reducing suicide in a military population.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Airman's Edge

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. 18 years of age or older; and
2. able to understand and speak the English language.

Exclusion Criteria

1. an inability to understand and speak the English language and
2. an inability to complete the informed consent process.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Xcelerate Innovations

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Utah

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Craig Bryan

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Craig J Bryan, PsyD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The University of Utah

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Whiteman Air Force Base

Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bryan, C. J., & Morrow, C. E. (2011). Circumventing mental health stigma by embracing the warrior culture: Lessons learned from the Defender's Edge program. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 42(1), 16-23. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022290

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Bryan CJ, Mintz J, Clemans TA, Burch TS, Leeson B, Williams S, Rudd MD. Effect of Crisis Response Planning on Patient Mood and Clinician Decision Making: A Clinical Trial With Suicidal U.S. Soldiers. Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Jan 1;69(1):108-111. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700157. Epub 2017 Oct 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28967323 (View on PubMed)

Bryan CJ, Mintz J, Clemans TA, Leeson B, Burch TS, Williams SR, Maney E, Rudd MD. Effect of crisis response planning vs. contracts for safety on suicide risk in U.S. Army Soldiers: A randomized clinical trial. J Affect Disord. 2017 Apr 1;212:64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.01.028. Epub 2017 Jan 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28142085 (View on PubMed)

Bryan CJ, Andreski SR, McNaughton-Cassill M, Osman A. Agency is associated with decreased emotional distress and suicidal ideation in military personnel. Arch Suicide Res. 2014;18(3):241-50. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2013.824836.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24712868 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://veterans.utah.edu/

National Center for Veterans Studies

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

W81XWH-18-2-0064

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

PT170195

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Testing the Efficacy of ACT for Life
NCT04829682 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA
Building Stronger Allies
NCT03571750 COMPLETED NA