Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
2055 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-01-01
2022-03-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The purpose of the Airman's Edge peer to peer program is to influence indicators of suicide risk among military personnel at two levels, group and individual, consistent with the program's hybrid design that combines group-based education and individual-level suicide prevention skills training. The hypotheses are therefore designed to examine outcomes and effects at multiple levels of the community, which could inform subsequent implementation and translational efforts. The following aims are proposed:
Aim 1: To test the efficacy of a peer to peer program for the reduction of suicidal behavior among military personnel.
Aim 2: To identify moderators and mediators of the peer to peer program's effects on suicidal behavior.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Peer Based Suicide Prevention
NCT04222673
Peer Mentorship to Reduce Suicide Risk Following Psychiatric Hospitalization
NCT02365116
Couples Intervention to Improve Mental Health
NCT04084756
Brief Interventions for Short-Term Suicide Risk Reduction in Military Populations
NCT02042131
A Brief Intervention to Reduce Suicide Risk in Military Service Members and Veterans- Study 1
NCT01334541
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
The proposed dynamic wait list design differs primarily from the traditional wait list designs with respect to timing of intervention. In the traditional wait list design, half of the squadrons (i.e., N/2) would be randomized to implement the P2P program early in the study and the remaining half would implement the P2P program later in the study. By contrast, the dynamic wait list randomizes the timing of the intervention over the entire course of the study period by first dividing the overall study period into m equal time blocks, and then randomizing N/m squadrons to receive the P2P program during each time block.
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Peer to peer program intervention
The experimental condition for the proposed project is the Airman's Edge program, a peer to peer program in which peer mentors will be trained to provide a series of interventions aimed at reducing risk for suicidal behaviors both directly and indirectly through the targeting of emotion dysregulation, cognitive rigidity, and contextual risk factors (e.g., insomnia, meaning in life, social support, firearm availability).
Peer to peer program intervention
Peer to peer suicide prevention program aimed at reducing suicide in a military population.
Wait list
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Peer to peer program intervention
Peer to peer suicide prevention program aimed at reducing suicide in a military population.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. able to understand and speak the English language.
Exclusion Criteria
2. an inability to complete the informed consent process.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Xcelerate Innovations
UNKNOWN
University of Utah
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Craig Bryan
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Craig J Bryan, PsyD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The University of Utah
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Whiteman Air Force Base
Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bryan, C. J., & Morrow, C. E. (2011). Circumventing mental health stigma by embracing the warrior culture: Lessons learned from the Defender's Edge program. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 42(1), 16-23. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022290
Bryan CJ, Mintz J, Clemans TA, Burch TS, Leeson B, Williams S, Rudd MD. Effect of Crisis Response Planning on Patient Mood and Clinician Decision Making: A Clinical Trial With Suicidal U.S. Soldiers. Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Jan 1;69(1):108-111. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700157. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
Bryan CJ, Mintz J, Clemans TA, Leeson B, Burch TS, Williams SR, Maney E, Rudd MD. Effect of crisis response planning vs. contracts for safety on suicide risk in U.S. Army Soldiers: A randomized clinical trial. J Affect Disord. 2017 Apr 1;212:64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.01.028. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
Bryan CJ, Andreski SR, McNaughton-Cassill M, Osman A. Agency is associated with decreased emotional distress and suicidal ideation in military personnel. Arch Suicide Res. 2014;18(3):241-50. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2013.824836.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
National Center for Veterans Studies
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
W81XWH-18-2-0064
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
PT170195
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.