Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
90 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-05-20
2020-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Phenotyping IBS: Perceptions and Modulations of Visceral Sensations
NCT02693730
Brain-Gut Interactions in Overweight and Normal Weight Patients With Chronic Abdominal Pain
NCT00824941
The Role of Intestinal Inflammation in Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
NCT01072903
Investigation of Acupoint in Irritable Bowel Syndrome Based on Biological Characteristics
NCT06365801
Small and Large Bowel Transit Tests Using MRI (Study 1)
NCT01534507
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
It is assumed that such heightened sensitivity depends both on bottom-up processing and top-down processing. Bottom-up processing refers to information that is relayed to the brain along so-called afferent fibres. Top-down processing refers to feedback provided by the brain to lower areas along efferent fibres.
The investigators will (1) measure the capacity of people to inhibit pain through top-down processing, (2) test if the human pain experience is enhanced due to sustained activation of certain afferents, and (3) assess to what extent people are impacted by psychosocial inhibition and activation factors. Results of people with IBS in remission will be compared with the results of two groups of people with IBD (those with pain and those without) and the investigators will explore if their measurements differentiate between groups.
It is hypothesized that (1) IBS patients and IBD patients with abdominal pain will be less able to inhibit their pain compared to IBD patients without abdominal pain (2) IBS patients and IBD patients with abdominal pain will score higher on psychosocial inhibition factors and lower on psychosocial activation factors when compared to IBD patients without abdominal pain. (3) In the total cohort, laboratory measures of pain inhibition will correlate with self-reported psychosocial inhibition and activation factors. (4) IBS patients and IBD patients with abdominal pain will show more temporal summation compared to IBD patients without abdominal pain.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Sufficient command of written and spoken English
* Proof of diagnosis of IBD (Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis) for more than 6 months - - Clear indicators of remission: on faecal calprotectin (≤200 µg/g) or measurements of C-reactive protein (CRP; ≤10 mg/dl) within the last 3 months or as part of recruitment
* No previous episodes of acute or sub-acute obstruction
* Current diagnosis of IBS measured with Rome IV criteria
* No serious other bowel diseases
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy or childbirth in the last 6 months
* Any other diagnosed medical condition that may explain abdominal pain, including but not limited to known gynaecological conditions such as endometriosis and known post-surgical adhesions
* Any diagnosed co-morbid medical conditions associated with known neuropathy, such as diabetic neuropathy, renal neuropathy, multiple sclerosis
* Use of opioids in the last week
* Use of anti-depressants used as pain medication in the last month
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
King's College London
OTHER
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Barts Health NHS Trust
London, , United Kingdom
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
London, , United Kingdom
King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Role: primary
Consultant Gastroenterologist
Role: primary
Consultant Gastroenterologist
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
253660
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.