High-intensity Interval Training and Mixed Meal Responses in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury

NCT ID: NCT04011137

Last Updated: 2022-07-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-04-01

Study Completion Date

2020-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Persons with chronic paraplegia at an increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease and type-2 diabetes compared to the able-bodied population. There is mounting evidence from the able-bodied literature that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is more effective than moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) at improving markers of cardiometabolic health. Before we can understand the long-term training effects of HIIT in this population, it is important to compare the acute metabolic responses to a typical mixed-macronutrient meal following both exercise modalities.

This study is recruiting adults (aged 18-65 years) with paraplegia (T2 or below) who sustained their spinal cord injury more than one-year ago. Participants will need to attend the laboratory at the University of Bath on four separate occasions, once for preliminary testing, and three times for study trials.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of this research is to determine the metabolic responses to a mixed-meal tolerance test following a bout of HIIT and MICT in persons with chronic paraplegia. The hypothesis is that HIIT and MICT will be more effective at reducing the total triglyceride responses compared to a resting control condition.

Preliminary measurements:

Preliminary testing will include anthropometric measurements of supine length, weight, waist and hip circumferences, and resting blood pressure. There will also be an assessment of resting metabolic rate, sub-maximal and maximal exercise capacity, and a HIIT familiarisation session. All of the exercise protocols will take place on an arm crank ergometer at the University of Bath.

Physical activity monitoring:

For 7 days, participants will be fitted with a physical activity monitor (Actiheart™). Participants should not make any conscious changes to their normal lifestyle habits/routines during this period.

Main trial days:

In the 2 days prior to the main trial day, participants will be asked to record their food and drink intake and 48 hours before they should refrain from performing any strenuous physical activity. In the 24 hours prior participants should also refrain from consuming any alcohol or caffeine.

Following a 10-hour overnight fast, an expired gas sample and venepuncture blood sample will be taken prior to exercise. Participants will then perform a bout of HIIT, MICT or a resting control condition. Following exercise, a cannula will be inserted into a vein and baseline blood sample(s) taken for analysis of metabolic markers.

The participant will then be asked to consume a smoothie, consisting of peanut butter, banana, coconut oil, sugar, and chocolate-flavoured whey protein powder. The meal should be consumed within 10 minutes and blood samples will be taken from the cannula at 15, 30, 45 60, and 90 minutes and then at every hour for 6 hours after consumption of the meal to monitor changes in metabolic and inflammatory markers. Expired gas samples will also be taken hourly and indirect calorimetry will be used to estimate relative fat and carbohydrate metabolism in response to the meal.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Paraplegia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

No exercise - 30-min of rest

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

High-intensity interval training

8 x 60 s intervals at 70% peak power output (intersperesed with 60 s recovery intervals at 10% peak power output)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Exercise

Intervention Type OTHER

Arm-cranking exercise

Moderate-intensity continous training

25 min at 45% peak power output

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Exercise

Intervention Type OTHER

Arm-cranking exercise

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Exercise

Arm-cranking exercise

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Individuals with a chronic (\>12 months post-injury) SCI below T2
* Individuals who spend \>75% of their waking day in a wheelchair
* Weight stable (weight not changed by \>3% over the last 3 months)

Exclusion Criteria

* Individuals who an acute (\<12 months post-injury) SCI
* Individuals who spend \<75% of their waking day in a wheelchair
* Individuals on type-2 diabetes medication
* Individuals with a peanut allergy
* Individuals who self-report use of lipid-lowering agents
* Individuals self-reporting active medical issues (pressure sores, urinary tract infections, cardiac disorders, musculoskeletal complaints of the upper extremities, or cardiovascular contraindications to exercise testing)
* Individuals who report uncontrolled or regular autonomic dysreflexia
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Bath

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

James Bilzon

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

James Bizon

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Bath

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department for Health

Bath, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Farrow MT, Maher JL, Nightingale TE, Thompson D, Bilzon JLJ. A Single Bout of Upper-Body Exercise Has No Effect on Postprandial Metabolism in Persons with Chronic Paraplegia. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021 May 1;53(5):1041-1049. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002561.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33560775 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EP 17/18 141

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.