Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
172 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-04-04
2015-05-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objective: To assess the difference in preoperative intra-individual reaction time variability between postoperative delirium and non-delirium elderly non-dementia patients undergoing elective surgery. Study design: An observational prospective cohort study.
Study population: Elderly patients (70 years or older) undergoing elective surgery.
Main study parameters/endpoints: Preoperative intra-individual reaction time variability among postoperative non-delirium and delirium patients.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Determining the Preliminary Efficacy of the Emergency Department Delirium Screening and Detection Program
NCT05638945
Nursing Assistant Intervention to Prevent Delirium in Nursing Homes
NCT02994979
Trial of a Non-pharmacological Intervention to Prevent Delirium Among Elderly In-patients
NCT03158909
Delirium in Geriatric Hospital Single-bed and Multibed Rooms
NCT03199768
The Impact of Cytochrome P450 Abnormalities in Patients With Delirium.
NCT03829670
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Development of delirium is associated with increasing age. The risk for postoperative delirium among elderly patients ranges from 4%-53%. Incidence differs between different surgical procedures and between emergency or elective surgery. A systematic review comparing general to regional anaesthetic procedures did not show significant differences in the risk for developing postoperative delirium.
Although an array of risk factors associated with development of delirium has been identified in numerous studies, validated models predicting delirium in individual patients are scarce.
Moreover, existing models tend to focus on demographic characteristics and comorbid conditions exclusively. Models predicting development of delirium by using individual pathophysiological markers involved in the evolution of delirium are absent.
Previous research has suggested that impairment of attentional function might serve as an early and specific individual predictor of incident delirium, even in previously cognitively undisturbed patients. So far only one study has prospectively assessed preoperative intra-individual reaction time variability as a predictor of postoperative delirium. This study was limited to elderly (age 70 years or older) patients undergoing elective hip and knee replacement and did not examine confounding factors such as preoperative use of (anti-cholinergic) drugs, preoperative presence of symptoms of depression, cognitive decline or impairment in activities of daily living making. Although this study showed significant higher preoperative intra-individual reaction time variability among patients developing postoperative delirium, no attempts to reproduce these findings in other surgical populations have been published to date, limiting external validity and practical implementation of these observations.
The investigators hypothesize that preoperative intra-individual reaction-time variability is an independent predictor of postoperative delirium. In this study the investigators aim at assessing the potential of preoperative administration of a short test of attentional function in predicting postoperative delirium in a population of elderly non-dementia patients undergoing major elective surgery. Utilization of a test measuring attentional function in a clinically easy-to-use tool could potentially yield a pathophysiological monitor to preoperatively identify individual patients undergoing elective surgery who are at an increased risk of evolving delirium and create a target for future prophylactic treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
The Cholinesterase Inhibitor Prognosticator (ChIP) application for iPad
The first part of this application will be used, consisting of a visual vigilance test based on the Continuous Performance Test (CPT). Stimuli consist of a one digit number presented in the middle of the screen. For each trial the application randomly selects a specific number as the target stimulus. Patients are instructed to keep their dominant trigger finger close to the screen and press a button which is located at the bottom of the screen, whenever the target appears. In case another stimulus appears the patient is instructed to do nothing. Each stimulus is presented until the patient presses the button (maximum 3 sec.). Stimuli are presented in a random fashion with a 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 second inter-stimuli-interval blank, which randomly varies. After an 8 stimuli practice trial, the test starts and a total of 50 stimuli are presented with a 50% target rate. Full-trial duration is approximately 5 minutes. During the trial, reaction time and accuracy of response are registered.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Elective surgery involving thoracotomy, major abdominal surgery (e.g. esophageal, gastric, hepatic, pancreatic, colorectal resection by either laparotomy or laparoscopic approach), major pelvic surgery (e.g. radical cystectomy, radical hysterectomy), or major orthopedic surgery (e.g. knee or hip replacement)
Exclusion Criteria
* Language barrier enough to hamper informed consent and iPad instructions
* Serious functional disability of the dominant hand (e.g. palsy, amputation, arthrodesis)
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
OTHER
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
W ten Hoope
Prof. dr. W.A. van Gool, MD, PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
W. A. van Gool, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NL47720.018.014
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.