Validating Studies to Assess the Diagnostic Accuracy of a Software Application for Detection and Monitoring of Attentional Deficits in Delirium
NCT ID: NCT02590796
Last Updated: 2018-05-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
907 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-10-12
2018-03-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The purpose of the Phase C study is to determine the efficacy of the DelApp software application in detecting delirium in unselected patients in an inpatient sample and to determine the performance of the DelApp to discriminate between delirium and dementia. The study also aims to explore the performance of the DelApp in tracking change in cognitive function.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Predicting Delirium by Attentional Dysfunction
NCT03988179
Trial of a Non-pharmacological Intervention to Prevent Delirium Among Elderly In-patients
NCT03158909
Nursing Assistant Intervention to Prevent Delirium in Nursing Homes
NCT02994979
Developing an Artificial Intelligence System to Detect Cognitive Impairment
NCT05794451
Non-invasive, Wearable Multi-parameter System for the Early Prediction of Cognitive Decline and Dementia in Older Adults
NCT04262674
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The DelApp has many advantages over existing tests, including objectivity, automated scoring and ease-of-use. Studies in 30 hospital patients showed highly comparable performance between the Delbox and DelApp. Further proof-of-principle single-rater studies using the DelApp in more than 200 hospital patients have provided additional evidence of good performance of the DelApp.
Though there are strong positive findings from investigator pilot studies, larger-scale formal studies with blinded raters and more representative patient samples are now required.
The proposed study is part of a larger programme of work funded by the Medical Research Council (grant value £1.01M) on the optimisation and clinical validation of the DelApp, which consists of three stages: Phase A - optimisation of the DelApp and feasibility testing (REC no 15/SC00/19); Phase B - case-control studies in selected patients; and Phase C - validation studies in unselected patients. Ultimately investigators aim to generate a software product which will be fully licensed and commercially available to healthcare organisations.
The proposed Phase B studies will be carried out in hospitalised patients in general and acute medical wards and ICU. The objectives of these studies are (a) to assess diagnostic performance of the DelApp in discrete patient groups and to inform optimal cut-points (Phase B); and (b) to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the DelApp in unselected patients (Phase C). The studies will also contribute to a better understanding of the nature of neuropsychological deficits underlying delirium. At the end of these studies, the DelApp may be modified depending on the study results. Investigators will select the stimuli and subtests that provide the best balance of sensitivity and specificity.
Two case-control studies will be conducted involving patients recruited from general and acute wards (Study B.1) and ICU (Study B.2). Each study will run in two sites, i.e. the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh (RIE) and the Glasgow Royal Infirmary (GRI). The performance of the DelApp (index test) against reference standard diagnosis will be independently assessed by two trained raters, with one pair of raters on each site. As in our prior case-control studies, convenience samples will be used, where clinicians are asked to identify patients in the target groups.
Hospitalised patients will be asked to undertake a number of tests at their bedside. These tests will be administered to patients once only. Patients will be visited by two different researchers on the same day, with a gap of approximately 15-60 min between assessment visits assuming that consent is provided in the first visit. The first visit will involve assessment of capacity and (in those thought likely to be capable of giving consent) obtaining informed consent, as well as assessment of delirium (reference tests) and cognition. The second visit will involve the DelApp assessment (index test). Thus, the index test and reference tests are administered by independent raters. Where the patient is unable to provide consent for themselves, proxy consent will be sought, and if granted, the same visits as above will occur.
The Phase C formal validation studies have a similar design to the case-control studies. The main difference is that unselected samples of patients will be recruited from general and acute medical wards (Study C.1) and ICU (Study C.2) in the GRI and RIE.
A subset of patients in studies C.1 and C.2 (N=60 combined) will undergo up to 4 repeat assessments (at least one day apart), along with the reference standard, to explore the performance of the DelApp in tracking change in cognitive function.
In the longitudinal assessments, researchers will ask patients able to provide consent at the time of recruitment if they consent to subsequent assessments even if at the time of these subsequent assessments the patient lacks capacity. However, during the subsequent assessments, it will be carefully checked if the patient assents to continue their participation in the study. In patients who initially lack capacity and have been included through consent from a legal proxy, and who are undergoing serial assessments, researchers will seek informed consent from patients at the beginning of each new testing session. If the patient regains capacity after the final assessment, the investigators will seek retrospective consent from the patient where possible.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Hospitalised patients with delirium
hospitalised patients with delirium in general wards.
No intervention given to participants
This is an observational study. Participants will receive no intervention.
Hospitalised patients with dementia/ no delirium
Hospitalised patients with a diagnosis of dementia who do not have delirium in general wards.
No intervention given to participants
This is an observational study. Participants will receive no intervention.
Hospitalised patients with no delirium or dementia
Hospitalised patients with no delirium or dementia in general wards.
No intervention given to participants
This is an observational study. Participants will receive no intervention.
Outpatients with dementia
People with a diagnosis of dementia who are living in the community.
No intervention given to participants
This is an observational study. Participants will receive no intervention.
Healthy volunteers
Healthy volunteers who are living in the community who do not have a cognitive impairment.
No intervention given to participants
This is an observational study. Participants will receive no intervention.
ICU delirium
Patients with delirium who are hospitalised in the intensive care units.
No intervention given to participants
This is an observational study. Participants will receive no intervention.
ICU no delirium
Patients who do not have delirium who are hospitalised in intensive care units.
No intervention given to participants
This is an observational study. Participants will receive no intervention.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
No intervention given to participants
This is an observational study. Participants will receive no intervention.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Aged 65 or over
* Capacity to provide written, informed consent or the availability of a suitable relative or welfare guardian/attorney who is able to provide informed consent on behalf of the participant.
ICU
* Aged 18 or over
* Capacity to provide written, informed consent or the availability of a suitable relative or welfare guardian/attorney who is able to provide informed consent on behalf of the patient.
Exclusion Criteria
* Unable to understand spoken task instructions
* Vision or hearing impairment severe enough to preclude testing or interview
* Photosensitive epilepsy
ICU
* Unable to understand spoken task instructions
* Pre-existing, known cognitive impairment including dementia
* Vision or hearing impairment severe enough to preclude testing or interview
* Photosensitive epilepsy
* A score on the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale of below -3
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cambridge Cognition Ltd
INDUSTRY
Medical Research Council
OTHER_GOV
NHS Lothian
OTHER_GOV
University of Glasgow
OTHER
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
OTHER
University of Edinburgh
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Alasdair MacLullich
Professor of Geriatric Medicine, University of Edinburgh. Honorary Consultant, Medicine of the Elderly, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David J Stott
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Glasgow
Elizabeth Wilson
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
Timothy Walsh
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Edinburgh
Tara Quasim
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Glasgow
Jonathan Evans
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Glasgow
Christopher Weir
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Edinburgh
Alexander Weir
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical Devices Unit
Stuart Parks
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical Devices Unit
Jennifer Barnett
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cambridge Cognition Ltd
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Edinburgh
Edinburgh, , United Kingdom
University of Glasgow
Glasgow, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rutter LM, Nouzova E, Stott DJ, Weir CJ, Assi V, Barnett JH, Clarke C, Duncan N, Evans J, Green S, Hendry K, McGinlay M, McKeever J, Middleton DG, Parks S, Shaw R, Tang E, Walsh T, Weir AJ, Wilson E, Quasim T, MacLullich AMJ, Tieges Z. Diagnostic test accuracy of a novel smartphone application for the assessment of attention deficits in delirium in older hospitalised patients: a prospective cohort study protocol. BMC Geriatr. 2018 Sep 17;18(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0901-5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DelApp
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.