Specialty Medical Homes to Improve Outcomes for Patients With IBD and Behavioral Health Conditions

NCT ID: NCT03985800

Last Updated: 2025-09-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

657 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-07-01

Study Completion Date

2025-03-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A comparative effectiveness study using an individual-level randomized design along with a pragmatic, mixed-methods approach to compare two strategies (e.g. in-person supported care, technology-supported care) all of which include evidence-based components for delivering IBD and BH care. Quantitative (e.g. self-report, electronic health record, process) and qualitative (e.g., interviews) data will be collected across multiple time points during the study period.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators propose to conduct a comparative effectiveness research (CER) study of two evidence-based, patient-centered approaches implemented within an existing Specialty Medical Home (SMH) model: TEAM, an in-person, multidisciplinary team-based approach delivered at point of care and TECH, a technology-based (digital therapeutics, and telehealth) approach delivered at the patient's convenience with the guidance of health coaches. Both are designed to support care for adult patients with complex, chronic health conditions and behavioral health (BH) disorders, and will be tested in three of the nation's largest and most established SMHs for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). IBD serves as an exemplary chronic disease model where untreated BH issues have been associated with poor medical outcomes.

Primary outcomes are composite scores of measures focused on 1) IBD Symptom Severity, and 2) BH Symptom Severity. IBD Symptom Severity is measured via a composite IBD Complexity Score involving responses to two patient-reported scales: the PROMIS-GI measure and either the Harvey Bradshaw Index (for participants with Crohn's disease) or ulcerative colitis activity index (for participants with ulcerative colitis). BH Symptom Severity was measured utilizing the Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety-Depression Scale (PHQ-ADS), a composite of two patient-reported scale for measuring anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-8). Scales are further defined in Results, Outcome Measures.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Behavioral Symptoms

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Comparison between technology interventions and in-person interventions.
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

TEAM-care as usual approach

Patients will be triaged based on their physical health (PH) and behavioral health (BH) complexity to determine the frequency of in-person visits and how much of these visits will be devoted to medical versus BH issues. Minor modifications were made to the TEAM approach during the COVID-19 public health emergency to account for reduced face-to-face time without changing the underlying differentiation between the two models of delivering SMH care.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

TEAM

Intervention Type OTHER

TEAM incorporates team-based care with traditional in-person clinic visits. The care team includes a gastroenterologist, nurse practitioner, nutritionist, social worker/behavioral health specialist, and a psychologist or psychiatrist.

TECH-telehealth approach

Each patient will have an initial face-to-face visit with the core treatment team described above and undergo the same triage process to determine their PH/BH care needs. Each TECH patient will participate in one face-to-face treatment team visit per year unless more frequent visits are deemed to be medically necessary; however, all other interactions will be conducted via technology-supported modalities

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

TECH

Intervention Type OTHER

TECH uses team-based care similar to TEAM, but in-person care is substituted with telemedicine (i.e., video visits and consultations) and digital behavioral health tools.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TEAM

TEAM incorporates team-based care with traditional in-person clinic visits. The care team includes a gastroenterologist, nurse practitioner, nutritionist, social worker/behavioral health specialist, and a psychologist or psychiatrist.

Intervention Type OTHER

TECH

TECH uses team-based care similar to TEAM, but in-person care is substituted with telemedicine (i.e., video visits and consultations) and digital behavioral health tools.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Inflammatory Bowel Disease Diagnosis of Crohn's or Ulcerative Colitis. Behavioral health symptoms mild to severe, defined as a score of \>= 6 on the Personal Health Questionnaire 4 (PHQ4)

Exclusion Criteria

* Lack of smart phone, and/or are unable to speak, read or understand English at the minimum-required level.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mount Sinai Hospital, New York

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Cleveland Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Pittsburgh

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Eva Szigethy

Professor of Psychiatry and Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Eva Szigethy, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IHS-2017C3-8930

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

STUDY19020176

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

TOD-IBD: Empowering Patients On-Demand
NCT06179563 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA
CorEvitas Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Registry
NCT03162549 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION