Prediction of Malignant Transformation of Oral Leukoplakia Using a MAGE-A-based Immunoscore
NCT ID: NCT03975322
Last Updated: 2019-12-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
500 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-12-01
2026-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A promising marker for the timely development of a OSCC is the detection of antigens of the MAGE-A gene family. The special feature of MAGE-A is that they can be detected in 93% of all OSCC and in approx. 85% of OLP that transform to OSCC. The detection of MAGE-A could also indicate changes in the immunological environment that occur prior to malignant OLP transformation and could be used for immunotherapies.
Aim of this study is to investigate MAGE-A as a predictive marker for the malignant transformation of OLP in the setting of a prospective, multicenter study and to establish it as a diagnostic parameter in addition to classical histology. In addition, the association of MAGE-A expression with the occurrence of immunological changes in OLP will be investigated in order to evaluate the possibility of minimally invasive immunotherapy of OLP.
The study is intended to include 500 biopsies of non-selected patients with OLP from university institutions and private practices. The follow-up should be at least 3 years, whereby it is examined whether an OSCC on the basis of the original OLP developed. After three years, an interim evaluation of the results with statistical evaluation will be carried out. In order to ensure that the course of the disease is monitored for at least three years for all OLPs, an extension of the monitoring period to 5 years is planned.
The study could establish a routine diagnostic parameter to supplement the histo-morphological diagnosis of OLP and evaluate the possibility of immunotherapy of OLP.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cathelicidin LL-37 Relation to Potentially Malignant Lesions
NCT06219330
Molecular Mechanisms of the Development of Precancerous and Cancerous Lesions of the Oral Cavity
NCT03026361
Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Link With Oral Cancer and Premalignant Lesions
NCT06087042
Infectious Aetiology of Potentially Malignant Disorders and Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Oral Cavity
NCT01636544
Oral Microbioma and Oral Malignant Disease
NCT05766150
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The most important aspect for increasing survival rate is seen in the early detection of OSCC and its precursor lesions. Up to 67 % of OSCC develop on the basis of oral leukoplakia (OLP), which frequently occur prior to the diagnosis of carcinoma. OLP treatment depends on the risk of malignant transformation. Therapeutic approaches range from simple observation to complete surgical excision of OLP. The scientific evidence regarding the handling of OLP is low. Current literature outlines missing evidence in therapeutic management of OLP. The early identification of OLP with a high risk of malignant degeneration is a relevant clinical question, since approx. 2% of OLPs transform malignantly each year. In lesions with dysplasia this rate increases to about 17%.
Gold standard for determining the risk of malignant transformation of OLP is the histologic determination of the degree of dysplasia. As the histological degree of dysplasia increases, so does the risk of developing PECM on the basis of OLP. The decision for a surgical or a conservative therapy currently depends on the degree of dysplasia of the OLP. The histopathological assessment of the degree of dysplasia is subjective and depends on the experience of the pathologist making the assessment. However, the major disadvantage in assessing the malignant transformation potential with this method is that many precursor lesions do not follow the histopathologically determined degree of dysplasia. Thus, 0-3% of hyperplasias (D0) and up to 30% of mild dysplasias (D1) transform to OSCC. D0 OLP are lesions, which are usually only observed according to current therapy recommendations. Thus, an assessment of the dignity of OLP and a long-term prediction of the risk for the development of OSCC are not reliable. OLP with a histopathologically low malignancy potential but a cell-biologically probable malignant transformation must be identified in order to prevent undertreatment of these patients.
The aim of this explorative study is to investigate whether the malignant transformation of OLP can be reliably predicted using immunohistochemical and molecular biological methods. A significant association of the expression of MAGE-A expression with the malignant transformation of OLP to OSCC has already been demonstrated in retrospective studies. It is now necessary to further develop these available test procedures and evaluate them in a prospective study in order to transfer them into clinical routine. Sensitivity and specificity of the investigated markers will be investigated in a prospective, multicenter setting. A non-selected group of patients will be examined. The aim is to establish a test procedure that can be used cost-effectively. The MAGE-A expression should serve as an indicator and for the application of new, innovative therapy concepts such as the immunotherapy of OLP.
The following questions will be answered:
i) Do OLP with malignant transformation show an increased MAGE-A expression in a time interval of 3 years (follow-up up to 5 years)? ii) How high is the sensitivity and specificity of MAGE-A expression as a predictive diagnostic test? Is immunohistochemical or molecular biological (RT-PCR) detection of MAGE-A better suited as a diagnostic test? iii) Can MAGE-A be used successfully as a diagnostic test in practice? iv) Is there an association between MAGE-A expression and immunological changes preceding malignant transformation (macrophage polarization, T cell infiltration, checkpoint expression, TLR expression)? v) Are the immunological changes in OLP potentially amenable to immunomodulatory therapy?
Short summary of the study protocol:
After the patient has been informed and included in the study, the first step is the photo documentation and then the incision biopsy of the OLP. The treating physician is free to choose whether to take a sample from one or more sites of the lesion. This procedure complies with the standard diagnostic guidelines and is not a study-specific measure. Thus, there is no deviation from the clinical routine for the study and no invasive measure required by the study. The sample taken is then divided. The total amount of tissue taken corresponds to the amount taken in the routine outside the study. One part of the sample is conventionally fixed in formalin. The second part (max. 5x5x2mm) is preserved in RNA later for later PCR analysis. Both samples will be sent to the study center in Erlangen. There the histological evaluation of the tissue takes place in the Pathological Institute of the University Hospital Erlangen within routine diagnostics. The result is communicated to the treating physician and the study centre. The immunohistochemical and molecular biological analyses are carried out in the laboratories of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Erlangen. The results of the analyses are not communicated to the attending physician (blinding). A therapy decision is only made on the basis of clinical and classical histological parameters (degree of dysplasia). D0 and D1 lesions are monitored. D2 and D3 lesions are treated surgically or with laser coagulation depending on the decision of the treating physician and patient. This corresponds to the current clinical standard. If the patient rejects the treatment of the lesion and wishes to continue observing its progress, he remains included in the study. The follow-up time during the study period is 3 years (evaluations also after 2 years). After completion of the study a further follow-up of 2 years is planned in order to achieve a total follow-up of 5 years.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 18 - 80 years
* Diagnosis of one or more leukoplakia of the oral cavity
including
* leukoplakia associated wit lichen planus OR
* leukoplakia associated with diseases of the immune system or immunosuppression OR
* leukoplakia associated with a malignoma of other sites (except oral cavity) in the anamnesis
* Existing consent to participation in the study after clarification has been given
Exclusion Criteria
* carcinoma of the oral cavity in the anamnesis OR
* patients unable to give informed consent OR
* rejection of the patient
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical School
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Manuel Weber
Dr. med. Dr. med. dent. Manuel Weber, MD, DMD, Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Manuel Weber, MD, DMD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Maxillofacial Surgery Erlangen
Falk Wehrhan, MD, DMD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Maxillofacial Surgery Erlangen
Jutta Ries, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Maxillofacial Surgery Erlangen
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg
Erlangen, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1.4
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.