Alfapump® System in the Treatment of Refractory or Recurrent Ascites (POSEIDON Study)
NCT ID: NCT03973866
Last Updated: 2022-12-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
110 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-09-16
2024-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
ALFApump System Versus Standard of Care in Ascites Treatment
NCT01528410
Retrospective Study in the Use of the Alfapump and the Treatment of Malignant Ascites
NCT03200106
Malignant Ascites Alfapump® Study
NCT04076566
A (M)Ulti-center, Prospective, (O)Pen Label, Uncontrolled Feasibility (S)Tudy to Assess the Safety and Effectiveness of an Automatic Low Flow (A)Scites (Alfa) Pump (I)n Patients With (C)Irrhosis and Refractory or Recurrent Ascites
NCT02400164
Alfapump-albumin Replacement Therapy
NCT02448160
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Pivotal Cohort Patients
Pivotal cohort patients will be evaluated in a 3-month pre-implant observation period during which they will receive standard of care therapy consisting of paracentesis as required for removal of ascitic fluid. Following the initial 3-month observation period during which the number and volume of paracentesis and Quality of life (assessed by general HRQL scores (SF-36)) as well as disease-specific validated questionnaires (Ascites-Q) will be documented, patients will be reevaluated for eligibility for pump implant.
Roll-in Patients
In the study centers without previous experience in pump placement, training in the pump implant procedure will be conducted and up to 3 initial pump implantations conducted as roll-in cases. Roll-in patients will be sequentially enrolled at the site until sufficient experience has been obtained and the site is approved by the sponsor to enroll in the pivotal phase. Roll-in patients will not undergo the 3-month pre-implant observation period and will not be included in the Primary Analysis set but will be summarized separately for purposes of safety evaluation with effectiveness data provided as supplemental. In the event a primary implanter at the site is a replaced or added, up to 3 additional Roll-in implants will be allowed.
All patients (Pivotal and Roll-in) will undergo a final eligibility assessment prior to pump implant. If deemed eligible, patients will be implanted with the alfapump. In the 3 months post-implant, patients will be monitored with pump adjustments as needed to increase or decrease volume of fluid to be removed each day. After this period of stabilization, a 3-month primary endpoint observation period (month 4 through month 6) will begin. In each period, the protocol specifies when symptom driven (therapeutic) paracentesis can be performed per protocol as well as conditions under which the use of diuretics may be considered (all patients must discontinue diuretics post implant procedure).
The study is designed to demonstrate in pivotal cohort patients 1) a 50% reduction (superiority margin) in the per-patient ratio of post-implant 3-month observation period (M4 to M6 post implantation) to pre-implant 3-month observation period with respect to average monthly requirement for therapeutic paracentesis and 2) at least 50% of patients will achieve a 50% reduction in the requirement for therapeutic paracentesis in the same period.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Alfapump
Implantation of Alfapump
Alfapump
Implantation of alfapump
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Alfapump
Implantation of alfapump
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Patients \> 18 years of age
2. Cirrhosis of the liver defined by histological and/or clinical, endoscopic, laboratory and radiological criteria.
3. Refractory or recurrent ascites primarily managed with periodic therapeutic paracentesis . Patients must have a minimum of 2 therapeutic paracenteses in the 30 Days prior to enrollment
4. Not a candidate for (e.g. refused, contraindicated) Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) or previously implanted TIPS is permanently obstructed or non-functioning.
5. Screened for esophageal varices and on optimal management
6. Absence of contraindications to prophylactic antibiotic use from time of pump implant
7. Life expectancy of at least 6 months following pump implant (approximately 10 months from enrollment)
8. Capable of giving written informed consent, willing to comply with study procedures including the 3-month pre-implant observation period and ability to operate and charge the device.
9. Women of childbearing age should use adequate contraceptives.
Reassessed at time of implant procedure (Pivotal Cohort Only):
10. Has required a minimum of 5 therapeutic paracenteses in the 3-month observation period prior to pump implant
Exclusion Criteria
1. Renal failure defined as serum creatinine higher than 1.5 mg/dL
2. More than one episode of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis over the previous 6 months
3. More than one episode of bacterascites over the previous 6 months
4. Recurrent urinary infections as per standard criteria, defined as 2 or more episodes over the last 6 months
5. Evidence of loculated ascites, as per imaging
6. Hepatocellular carcinoma, exceeding Milan criteria or for which RF ablation is anticipated
7. Pregnant females or females anticipating pregnancy during study period
8. Patients currently enrolled in another interventional clinical study that has not reached the primary endpoint assessment point, or (for pivotal cohort) patients who have previously had an alfapump implanted
9. Immuno-modulatory treatment (including azathioprine, methotrexate, anti-TNF therapies) used within last 4 months (corticosteroids at stable dose over the last 4 months but \< 15 mg/day, or in tapering doses are allowed)
10. Known or suspected hepatic or extra hepatic malignancy (other than skin cancer and in-situ cancers), unless adequately treated or in complete remission for ≥ 3 years
11. History of bladder cancer
12. BMI\>40 presenting a risk for technical difficulties for surgery or catheter implantation
13. Contraindications to general anesthesia
14. Comorbid condition or other reason (example hypertension) that may preclude stopping diuretics after enrollment
15. MELD-Na Score \> 20
16. Budd Chiari syndrome (Pivotal cohort only)
17. Clostridium difficile infection within the past year
Assessed or re-assessed at time of pump implant:
18. Acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage requiring transfusions over the previous 42 days
19. Condition that prevents continued cessation of diuretic use
20. Patient condition does not allow the implant procedure to be performed within the limits of acceptable risk (e.g. cardiovascular comorbidities, variceal bleeding within the previous 6 weeks, skin infections or skin ulcers of the anterior abdominal wall within 2 weeks of device placement)
21. Hepatocellular carcinoma exceeding Milan criteria or for which RF ablation is anticipated
22. ICU admission since enrollment in the 30 days preceding pump implant procedure
23. INR \>/= 2.0
24. Platelet count of \< 50,000 /μL at the time of implantation, unless the platelet count is ≥30,000 / μL and bleeding risk can be satisfactorily addressed with means such as platelet infusion during the implant procedure and/or thrombopoietin receptor agonists
25. Bacterial peritonitis within 4 weeks of implant procedure (this includes peritonitis diagnosed at the time of intervention)
26. Bacterascites within 4 weeks of implant procedure (this includes bacterascites diagnosed at the time of intervention). Note: at the time of final eligibility (just prior to implantation) the subject will not be allowed to move forward with the procedure if he/she has experienced an episode bacterascites within four weeks of the implant procedure date.
27. Serum sodium \<125 mmol/L
28. Urinary infection within the last 2 weeks
29. Obstructive uropathy, residual urinary volume exceeding 100 ml, or any bladder anomaly which might contraindicate implantation of the device
30. Evidence of renal failure, defined as serum creatinine higher than or equal to 1.5 mg/dL, in the preceding 30 days
31. Evidence of loculated ascites, as per imaging
32. Pregnant females or females anticipating pregnancy during study period
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sequana Medical N.V.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Florence Wong, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Toronto General Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mayo Clinic (Arizona)
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Cedars-Sinai Comprehensive Transplant Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Avera Medical Group
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States
Methodist Dallas
Dallas, Texas, United States
Baylor University Medical Center (Dallas)
Dallas, Texas, United States
McGuire VA Medical Center
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Medical College of Wisconsin (Froedtert)
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Toronto General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wong F, Vagas HE, Reddy KR, Pagadala MR, Pocha C, Sundaram V, Bajaj JS, Shlomovitz E, Bendel E, Capel J, Kamath PS; POSEIDON Study Group. The Effects of Alfapump on Ascites Control and Quality of Life in Patients With Cirrhosis and Recurrent or Refractory Ascites. Am J Gastroenterol. 2025 Jan 6;120(10):2291-301. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003300. Online ahead of print.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2017-AAR-010
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.