ALFApump System Versus Standard of Care in Ascites Treatment
NCT ID: NCT01528410
Last Updated: 2017-06-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
58 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-08-17
2016-09-21
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Retrospective Study in the Use of the Alfapump and the Treatment of Malignant Ascites
NCT03200106
Alfapump-albumin Replacement Therapy
NCT02448160
A (M)Ulti-center, Prospective, (O)Pen Label, Uncontrolled Feasibility (S)Tudy to Assess the Safety and Effectiveness of an Automatic Low Flow (A)Scites (Alfa) Pump (I)n Patients With (C)Irrhosis and Refractory or Recurrent Ascites
NCT02400164
Effects of Treatment of Ascites by the ALFApump System on Renal and Circulatory Function
NCT01438970
Alfapump System Versus Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt and Paracentesis in the Treatment of Ascites
NCT02612519
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ALFApump removal of ascites
Removal of ascites
ALFApump removal of ascites
Implanted ALFApump, removing produced ascites according to programmed schedule
Large volume paracentesis for removal of ascites
Removal of ascites
Large volume paracentesis for removal of ascites
Large volume paracentesis - standard of care, removing ascites according to patient need
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ALFApump removal of ascites
Implanted ALFApump, removing produced ascites according to programmed schedule
Large volume paracentesis for removal of ascites
Large volume paracentesis - standard of care, removing ascites according to patient need
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Cirrhosis of the liver defined by histological and/or clinical, and/or radiological criteria
3. Presenting refractory or recurrent ascites and requiring periodic large volume paracentesis (large volume defined as \> 5 L to accord with teh clinical guidance of EASL, European Association for the Study of the Liver, which recommends withdrawal of 5 L should precipitate administration of albumin).
4. Capable of giving written informed consent, willing to comply with study procedures and ability to operate the device
Exclusion Criteria
2. Renal failure defined as serum creatinine higher than or equal to 2 mg/dl
3. Severe coagulopathy defined as prothrombin time greater than 40% more than upper limit of Normal (as determined locally).
4. Platelet count of less than 40000 /uL unless platelet therapy is given at the time of surgery
5. Clinical Evidence of recurring bacterial peritonitis, defined as 2 or more episodes over the last 6 months or a single episode within the last 2 weeks.
6. Clinical evidence of recurring urinary infections, defined as 2 or more episodes over the last 6 months or a single episode within the last 2 weeks.
7. Clinical evidence of loculated ascites.
8. Advanced hepatocarcinoma, defined as one which exceeds Milan criteria.
9. Obstructive uropathy, residual urinary volume exceeding 100 ml, or any bladder anomaly which might contraindicate implantation of the device.
10. Concurrently implanted with any other Active Implantable Medical Device, including, but not limited to, cardiac pacemaker or cardioverter defibrillator.
11. Pregnant females or females anticipating pregnancy during study period
12. Patients currently enrolled in another interventional clinical study
13. Other concomitant disease or condition likely to significantly decrease life expectancy or present anaesthetic risk (e.g., moderate to severe congestive heart failure)
14. Known presence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
15. Immuno-modulatory treatment (including azothioprine, methotrexate, anti-TNF therapies) used within last 4 months
16. Known or suspected hepatic or extra hepatic malignancy, unless adequately treated or in complete remission for ≥ 3 years
17. BMI \> 40 presenting a risk for surgery and tunneled lines
18. Patients with contraindications for general anesthesia
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sequana Medical N.V.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rajiv Jalan, Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UCL Institute of Hepatology, Royal Free Hospital, London
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Vienna General Hospital and Medical School, AKH
Vienna, , Austria
Hopital Beaujon
Clichy, Paris, , France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse
Toulouse, , France
Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova
Padua, , Italy
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona, , Spain
Bristol Royal Infirmary
Bristol, , United Kingdom
Royal Free Hospital
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Stepanova M, Nader F, Bureau C, Adebayo D, Elkrief L, Valla D, Peck-Radosavljevic M, McCune A, Vargas V, Simon-Talero M, Cordoba J, Angeli P, Rossi S, MacDonald S, Capel J, Jalan R, Younossi ZM. Patients with refractory ascites treated with alfapump(R) system have better health-related quality of life as compared to those treated with large volume paracentesis: the results of a multicenter randomized controlled study. Qual Life Res. 2018 Jun;27(6):1513-1520. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1813-8. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
Bureau C, Adebayo D, Chalret de Rieu M, Elkrief L, Valla D, Peck-Radosavljevic M, McCune A, Vargas V, Simon-Talero M, Cordoba J, Angeli P, Rosi S, MacDonald S, Malago M, Stepanova M, Younossi ZM, Trepte C, Watson R, Borisenko O, Sun S, Inhaber N, Jalan R. Alfapump(R) system vs. large volume paracentesis for refractory ascites: A multicenter randomized controlled study. J Hepatol. 2017 Nov;67(5):940-949. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2012-AAR-005
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.