Comparison of Saphenous Vein Harvesting by Endoscopic Versus Open Conventional Methods

NCT ID: NCT03966222

Last Updated: 2021-09-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-01-01

Study Completion Date

2022-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to investigate the histological and immunohistochemical findings of the saphenous vein graft, to rule out endothelial damage as a direct result of manipulation or instrumentation by endoscopic and open conventional harvesting methods. Furthermore, to investigate if there are any differences in the surgical site infection, cardiac event and functional status between the two harvest strategies at 1-year of follow-up.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

BACKGROUND Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of death globally that accounts for about 7.4 million mortalities worldwide annually as published by the World Health Organization. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are the options for revascularization in patients suffering from coronary artery disease (CAD). The choice of the most appropriate modality is affected by the clinical presentation, comorbidities, anatomical complexity of the CAD, and baseline characteristics of the patient. Although advances in PCI with drug-eluting stents have provide good outcomes, CABG remains an important revascularization strategy in the treatment of CAD.

The initial experience of using saphenous vein as coronary bypass conduits was first published from the Cleveland clinic in 1967. Minimally invasive endoscopic vein harvest (EVH) was first reported in 1996 as an alternative to open vein harvest (OVH). An endoscope is introduced adjacent to the vein, allowing its dissection under direct vision via a small incision. Over the last decade, EVH has become the preferred technique for conduit harvest in many cardiothoracic centers owing to the overall reduction in complications compared with OVH and the obvious cosmetic advantage. However, concerns persist regarding the risk of microscopic damage incurred during EVH, and the consequences of this for long-term graft patency.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study is to investigate the histological and immunohistochemical findings of the saphenous vein graft, to rule out endothelial damage as a direct result of manipulation or instrumentation by endoscopic and open conventional harvesting methods. Furthermore, to investigate if there are any differences in the surgical site infection, cardiac event and functional status between the two harvest strategies at 1-year of follow-up.

METHODS This is a prospective, single-center randomized controlled trial conducted in the department of cardiac surgery at the Sheba Medical Center. It will include a sample size of 50 patients (randomization ratio 1:1), who are planned to undergo an elective isolated CABG surgery, and a vein graft is necessary for the revascularization.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Open vein harvest

For the standard open conventional technique, the saphenous vein will be exposed by a longitudinal leg incision starting from the medial malleolus and ending at the upper medial thigh at the sapheno-femoral junction. The saphenous vein will be dissected free from its perivascular fat pedicle and visible side branches will be ligated and divided.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Open vein harvest

Intervention Type OTHER

Open vein harvest

Endoscopic vein harvest

We will use the Terumo VirtuoSaph® Plus Endoscopic Vessel Harvesting System for all endoscopic vein extractions, which is an open carbon dioxide (CO2) system. Approximately 6 l/min of CO2 will be continuously insufflated in the subcutaneous tunnel.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Endoscopic vein harvest

Intervention Type DEVICE

An endoscope is introduced adjacent to the vein, allowing its dissection under direct vision via a small incision.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Endoscopic vein harvest

An endoscope is introduced adjacent to the vein, allowing its dissection under direct vision via a small incision.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Open vein harvest

Open vein harvest

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female patients over the age of 18;
* Patients with ischemic heart disease who are planned to undergo CABG surgery;
* A vein graft in necessary for the revascularization;
* There is no indication for one specific method for vein harvesting;
* Informed consent obtained.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who undergo a non-elective surgery
* Concomitant procedures during the CABG surgery;
* Any known infection in the past 6 months;
* Evidence of vein thrombosis in an ultrasound study prior to surgery;
* Morbid obesity patients;
* Patients with peripheral vascular disease;
* Patients who would gain from one technique more than the other by any reason (according to the surgeon or investigator opinion);
* Severe primary mitral and aortic valve stenosis or regurgitation;
* Patients who have undergone a previous cardiac surgery from any kind;
* Patients who underwent any surgery in the lower extremities in the past (i.e. orthopedic, vascular, etc.);
* Any serious disease likely to interfere with the conduct of the study;
* Participation in other clinical trial;
* Patients geographically not stable or unavailable for follow-up.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sheba Medical Center

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Eilon Ram

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Leonid Sternik, M.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Sheba Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sheba Medical Center

Ramat Gan, , Israel

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Israel

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Eilon Ram, M.D.

Role: CONTACT

3-5302710 ext. 972

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Eilon Ram, M.D.

Role: primary

526669119 ext. 972

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Sheba-19-6192-ER-CTIL

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.