Ultrasonographic Parameters for Fetal Weight Prediction

NCT ID: NCT03962153

Last Updated: 2019-05-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-01

Study Completion Date

2019-04-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The hypothesis is to increase the predictability of the ultrasound examination evaluating new fetal parameters: in fact the thickness of the soft tissues can contribute significantly to the fetal weight and the characteristics of the thoracic cage may correlate with the fetal weight.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Estimation of fetal weight (EFW: Estimated Fetal Weight) with ultrasound examination is a common practice in obstetrics and is important for planning the mode and timing of birth, especially in pregnancies at risk for altered fetal growth.

The conditions most commonly associated with impaired fetal growth are:

* IUGR: in these cases the ultrasound estimate of fetal weight is fundamental to decide the timing of delivery, since the neonatal outcome correlates positively with the fetal weight as well as with the flowmetry parameters
* fetal macrosomia (fetal weight greater than 4500 g) associated or not with gestational diabetes: in such cases an accurate estimation of the fetal weight is necessary and careful evaluation of any fetal-pelvic disproportion to decide both the timing of the birth that can be anticipated compared to at the physiological end of pregnancy is the mode of birth, vaginal or laparotomic in the event of a pelvic fetus disproportion.

In the 1970s the estimate of fetal weight was based on the measurement of the symphysis-fundus uterine distance (SFH) for which:

* SFH \<33 cm: predictive of a fetal weight \<3100 gr
* SFH\> 34 cm: predictive of a fetal weight = o\> 4000 gr.

At present, the fetal weight estimate is performed with biometric ultrasound parameters:

* DBP: biparietal diameter
* HC: head circumference
* AC: abdominal circumference
* FL: femur length There are standardized tables of variation of these parameters according to the gestational epoch for which the knowledge of the correct gestational epoch is fundamental for the correct interpretation of the data.

The fetal weight is calculated using mathematical formulas automatically obtained from ultrasound equipment of which the most used:

* Shepard's formula as a function of BPD and AC.
* formula of Campbell and Wilkin: it is in function of the abdominal circumference
* Hadlock formula: use the combination of different biometric parameters (BPD-HC-AC-FL).

Even if the guidelines provide for three ultrasound examinations for physiological pregnancies (one for each trimester of pregnancy), it is common practice to evaluate the biometric ultrasound parameters at the end of pregnancy and in any case when the patient is admitted for the delivery. It is obvious that in this time of pregnancy a closer correlation between biometric parameters and fetal weight is observed.

The problems related to the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight are represented by:

* significant intra-operator variability
* reduced accuracy for extremes of fetal weight (small or macrosomic fetuses)
* about 10% discrepancy between estimated fetal weight on an echographic basis according to Hadlock and actual weight of the newborn at birth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fetal Growth Abnormality

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Obstetric Ultrasonography

Obstetric Ultrasonography

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* pregnant women

Exclusion Criteria

* fetal structural and / or chromosomal anomalies
* multiple pregnancies
* premature births (gestational age \<37w)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Prof. Pasquale De Franciscis

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"

Napoli, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

N.603

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.