Validation of Consumer Activity Monitors in Postoperative Total Arthroplasty Patients
NCT ID: NCT03958370
Last Updated: 2019-05-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
70 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-01-08
2019-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Fitbit and Social Support in Knee Replacement Patients & Buddies
NCT03037619
Activity Trackers for Monitoring During Rehabilitation After Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03368287
Home Monitoring After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03032068
Incorporating Wearable Technology for Enhanced Rehabilitation Monitoring After Hip and Knee Replacement
NCT06157190
Fit-Joints: Getting Fit for Hip or Knee Replacement
NCT02885337
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Consumer activity monitors are generally manufactured to be used in a relatively healthy, ambulatory population. Their accuracy has been validated in multiple studies in healthy subjects in a variety controlled settings. Based on these validity studies, it is clear that some of these consumer activity monitors have worse accuracy in certain situations, such as slower-paced walking or in people using assistive devices for ambulation, such as canes. The limitations of these devices in these settings could be problematic for monitoring post-arthroplasty patients since all these patients ambulate slowly, with an altered gait, and with a walker. No studies to date have looked at the accuracy of consumer activity monitors in the immediate postoperative arthroplasty population.
The consumer activity monitor market is rapidly evolving and changing, so much so that monitors used just last year might be obsolete this year. Therefore, rather than examining the accuracy of one device versus another, it is more applicable to determine what location is most accurate for placement of these monitors to help providers counsel patients on proper use postoperatively.
Our goal for this study is to validate and to determine the best location for placement of the Fitbit Zip in the postoperative total joint arthroplasty patient population.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Fitbit
Fitbit
Fitbit use during physical therapy session
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fitbit
Fitbit use during physical therapy session
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA class I-IV
* expected to ambulate with PT on postoperative day 1 or 2
* no history of chronic opioid or alcohol use
* no history of delirium
* ability to read and understand English
* patient agreement
Exclusion Criteria
* bilateral arthroplasty patients,
* patients who are non- ambulatory preoperatively (e.g. wheelchair bound),
* patients who are not expected to ambulate with PT either due to intraoperative or postoperative complications,
* patients with contact precautions
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Virginia Mason Hospital/Medical Center
OTHER
Benaroya Research Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Virginia Mason Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB17-053
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.