Surgery in Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation

NCT ID: NCT03953755

Last Updated: 2022-10-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

SUSPENDED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-01

Study Completion Date

2027-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Currently, in cardiology/cardiosurgery the indicators for the surgical correction of secondary tricuspid regurgitationare unclear. AIM: To compare right ventricle structural and functional changes after operation in patients with secondary tricuspid regurgitation with severe mitral /aortic valve pathology, requiring surgical intervention; define the factors influencing major adverse cardiac events depending on the operation/non-operation due to moderate tricuspid regurgitation. This study intends to include 200-300 people and will occur over 5 years with an additional 3-year follow-up.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background It has been demonstrated in recent large patient monitoring registers that the presence of even mild secondary tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has a significant effect on life expectancy. Currently, in cardiology/cardiosurgery the indicators for the surgical correction of secondary TR are unclear. In this area, international guidelines lack randomized studies and are based on a C level of evidence. C level evidence is based solely on the opinion of experts, retrospective, and/or observational studies. The first indicator for tricuspid valve (TV) surgery is considered to be a combination of TR with severe aortic or mitral valve lesions that require surgical treatment. However, the level of indicators for moderate corrections in such situations is typically II A-B. At the C level of evidence there is no consensus for surgical treatment of such a defect in the international community. Severe TR indicators are Class I while the evidence remains C level because it is not well established that surgical treatment improves the prognosis of these patients. There is a lack of information about the structural and functional changes of the right ventricle after surgery depending on the degree of TR.

Aims and objectives of studying AIM: To compare right ventricle structural and functional changes after operation in patients with secondary tricuspid regurgitation with severe mitral /aortic valve pathology, requiring surgical intervention; define the factors influencing major adverse cardiac events depending on the operation/non-operation due to moderate tricuspid regurgitation.

OBJECTIVES:

1. To study tricuspid regurgitation parameters affecting the long-term prognosis for the surgical correction of severe secondary tricuspid regurgitationof patients with severe aortic/mitral valve pathology requiring surgical treatment.
2. To define hemodynamic parameters of patients with moderate tricuspid regurgitation, when surgical treatment of this defect gives an additional improvement in the short-term and long-term prognosis following surgical treatment of severe aortic/mitral valve diseases.
3. To study changes in contractility parameters in the right ventricle and tricuspid valve function after reconstructive surgery over a period of 3 years.

Methods and study plans This study intends to include 200-300 people and will occur over 5 years with an additional 3-year follow-up.

Inclusion criterion: 1) Signed informed consent form, 2) Previously diagnosed aortic or mitral heart diseases requiring surgical treatment, 3) Over 18 years of age 4) The presence of moderate or severe secondary tricuspid insufficiency.

Exclusion criterion: 1) Significant oncology diseases with a known prognosis of a less than 1 year life expectancy.

Cardiologist examination and survey. Echocardiography All patients will undergo standard echocardiography, including a detailed study of the function and sizes of the right ventricle and right atrium, and measurement of global longitudinal left ventricular deformations using the Speckle Tracking method, peak systolic and diastolic blood flow velocity in TV, fractional changes in area, and tricuspid annulus systolic excursion. Tricuspid regurgitation will be measured according to the standards of EAE/ASE, and will also use the recent 3-tiered classification system of severe insufficiency.

Laboratory techniques Standard for surgical treatment of aortic/mitral valve Coronary catheterization Standard for surgical treatment of aortic/mitral valve, Plan I. Initial visit - cardiologist/cardiosurgeon clinical evaluation - survey and examination II. Echocardiography study - screening - defining degree of tricuspid regurgitation III. Common tests for surgical treatment of aortic/mitral valve IV. Patient randomization with only a moderate degree of TR V. Surgical treatment VI. 30-40 days after surgery - cardiologist examination VII. 90 days after surgery ¬ - cardiologist examination + echocardiography VIII. 1 year after surgery - cardiologist examination + echocardiography IX. 3 years after surgery - cardiologist examination + echocardiography Expected benefits for patients All patients will receive advanced tests using the latest safe ultrasound methods. Frequent echocardiography and patient observations can reveal possible complications after cardiac surgery for aortic/mitral diseases; This study will allow for the correction of drug therapy due to extended diagnosis.

Severe lesions of the tricuspid valve and aortic / mitral heart defects will be corrected in all patients.

New and / or untested methods of treatment will not be used in this study. All surgical procedures will already have undergone testing and been proven effective for the treatment of heart diseases.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tricuspid Regurgitation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control 1

no/mild tricuspid regurgitation - left-side surgery alone

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

moderate TR - left-side surgery

moderate tricuspid regurgitation - left-side surgery alone

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

moderate TR - left-side surgery+TVS

moderate tricuspid regurgitation - left-side surgery+tricuspid valve surgery

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tricuspid valve repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Tricuspid valve repair

Control 2

tricuspid regurgitation - left-side surgery +tricuspid valve surgery

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tricuspid valve repair

Tricuspid valve repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age \> 18 years
2. Indication left-side valve surgery

Exclusion Criteria

1. Unwillingness to give informed consent and to enter a regular follow-up program.
2. Prior surgical or percutaneous mitral valve intervention
3. Contraindication to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)
4. Clinical signs of cardiogenic shock at the time of randomization
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Saint Petersburg State University, Russia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Efremov Sergey

Deputy director for scince

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dmitry Shmatov, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Saint Petersburg State University, Russia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

St. Petersburg State University

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Russia

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

5/2018

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.