Balance, Trunk Impairment and Fear of Falling in Multiple Sclerosis Patients With Incontinence

NCT ID: NCT03945006

Last Updated: 2019-05-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-03-25

Study Completion Date

2019-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the present study was to examine balance, trunk impairment, and fear of falling in MS patients with incontinence. Clinical symptoms of the MS patients are heterogenous, and they vary according to the lesion levels and the duration and the type of the disease. In the neurologic group,especially in MS patients, incontinence is observed even at early stages.

Pelvic floor muscles contribute to continence by stabilizing the bladder neck and increasing the intraurethral pressure. Furthermore, they mechanically support the spine and the pelvis.This mechanical support is attained through an increase in sacroiliac joint stiffness and intra-abdominal pressure changes, which are important for spinal control. Along with incontinence, this mechanical support deteriorates resulting in some problems. By this way, postural function of pelvic floor muscles may alter in individuals with incontinence, and thus, lumbopelvic stabilization may be negatively affected. In addition, the activity of trunk muscles changes in individuals with incontinence, which may result in spinal movement and affect the posture. Therefore, balance disorders may develop. Postural sways caused by balance disorders and the decrease in postural corrections have been listed among risk the factors associated with falling.

When literature is examined, there exists no study examining the effects of incontinence on balance, trunk impairment, and fear of falling in MS patients. For all these reasons, investigators think that incontinence in MS patients has an effect on balance, trunk impairment, and fear of fall.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study was aimed to investigate balance, trunk impairment, and fear of falling in MS patients with and without incontinence.

The study was conducted in 35 MS patients with an age range of 24-58 years. The patients were divided into two groups based on the occurrence of incontinence. A neurologic examination was performed using the EDSS by a neurologist.

Incontinence was measured with the Incontinence Severity Index (ISI), balance was measured with a Technobody® stabilometric platform, and fear of falling was measured with the Falls Efficacy Scale (FES).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Multiple Sclerosis Physical Therapy Incontinence

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Multiple Sclerosis Patients with Incontinence

Multiple Sclerosis with incontinence 24-58 years of age and being volunteered.

Incontinence Severity

Intervention Type OTHER

The Incontinence Severity Index (ISI) was used to assess the MS patients' incontinence severity.The first item is scored between 1 and 4 and the second item is scored between 1 and 3. The total score is calculated by the multiplication of these two answers. The index score is classified as 1-2 slight, 3-6 moderate, 8-9 severe, and 12 very severe.

Balance

Intervention Type OTHER

The patients were assessed while their bladders were empty. The static balance of the patients was measured with a Technobody® stabilometric platform. The patients were assessed while their bladders were empty. The test was performed as the patients' arms on the sides, eyes open and closed, and on two feet. Ellipse area, anterior-posterior sway, and medial-lateral sway scores were recorded.

Trunk impairment

Intervention Type OTHER

Trunk impairment was assessed with the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) while the participants' bladders were empty. The scale evaluates static and dynamic sitting balance and trunk coordination through 17 items. Each item is scored between 0 and 3. The total score ranges between 0 and 23, and higher scores indicate a better balance performance.

Fear of falling

Intervention Type OTHER

Fear of falling was assessed using the Falls Efficacy Scale developed by Tinetti and colleagues. The scale has 10 items assessing the effect of fear of falling on the confidence level of the individuals while performing activities of daily living. Each items is scored by the participants between 0 (not at all concerned) and 10 (very concerned), and the total of the score ranges between 0 (low fall efficacy) and 100 (high fall efficacy)

Multiple Sclerosis Patients without incontinence

Multiple Sclerosis without incontinence 24-58 years of age and being volunteered.

Incontinence Severity

Intervention Type OTHER

The Incontinence Severity Index (ISI) was used to assess the MS patients' incontinence severity.The first item is scored between 1 and 4 and the second item is scored between 1 and 3. The total score is calculated by the multiplication of these two answers. The index score is classified as 1-2 slight, 3-6 moderate, 8-9 severe, and 12 very severe.

Balance

Intervention Type OTHER

The patients were assessed while their bladders were empty. The static balance of the patients was measured with a Technobody® stabilometric platform. The patients were assessed while their bladders were empty. The test was performed as the patients' arms on the sides, eyes open and closed, and on two feet. Ellipse area, anterior-posterior sway, and medial-lateral sway scores were recorded.

Trunk impairment

Intervention Type OTHER

Trunk impairment was assessed with the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) while the participants' bladders were empty. The scale evaluates static and dynamic sitting balance and trunk coordination through 17 items. Each item is scored between 0 and 3. The total score ranges between 0 and 23, and higher scores indicate a better balance performance.

Fear of falling

Intervention Type OTHER

Fear of falling was assessed using the Falls Efficacy Scale developed by Tinetti and colleagues. The scale has 10 items assessing the effect of fear of falling on the confidence level of the individuals while performing activities of daily living. Each items is scored by the participants between 0 (not at all concerned) and 10 (very concerned), and the total of the score ranges between 0 (low fall efficacy) and 100 (high fall efficacy)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Incontinence Severity

The Incontinence Severity Index (ISI) was used to assess the MS patients' incontinence severity.The first item is scored between 1 and 4 and the second item is scored between 1 and 3. The total score is calculated by the multiplication of these two answers. The index score is classified as 1-2 slight, 3-6 moderate, 8-9 severe, and 12 very severe.

Intervention Type OTHER

Balance

The patients were assessed while their bladders were empty. The static balance of the patients was measured with a Technobody® stabilometric platform. The patients were assessed while their bladders were empty. The test was performed as the patients' arms on the sides, eyes open and closed, and on two feet. Ellipse area, anterior-posterior sway, and medial-lateral sway scores were recorded.

Intervention Type OTHER

Trunk impairment

Trunk impairment was assessed with the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) while the participants' bladders were empty. The scale evaluates static and dynamic sitting balance and trunk coordination through 17 items. Each item is scored between 0 and 3. The total score ranges between 0 and 23, and higher scores indicate a better balance performance.

Intervention Type OTHER

Fear of falling

Fear of falling was assessed using the Falls Efficacy Scale developed by Tinetti and colleagues. The scale has 10 items assessing the effect of fear of falling on the confidence level of the individuals while performing activities of daily living. Each items is scored by the participants between 0 (not at all concerned) and 10 (very concerned), and the total of the score ranges between 0 (low fall efficacy) and 100 (high fall efficacy)

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Evaluation Evaluation Evaluation Evaluation

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis Disease
* The level of disability should be between 0.5-4 according to EDSS
* having a score of 24 or more in the Mini Mental Status Test

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with acute attacks (six months prior to the study)
* Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of less tahn 25 points
* History of shoulder injury, surgery, medical problems or other neurological disorders in any of the participants
Minimum Eligible Age

24 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

58 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Faculty of Health Sciences,Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation

Ankara, Esenboğa, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

72

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.